Sentences with phrase «fundamental right question»

Lastly about one - third or respondents felt that the internet was a good place to find a boyfriend / girlfriend, I'm not sure if that ties into the fundamental right question or not..........

This is a controversial topic to be sure, but it does raise a fundamental rights question that may be addressed at both the state level and the federal level.

Not exact matches

«The more fundamental issue is, «Were we stepping back and asking the right questions?»

On pp. 19 - 21, Michael McCullough explores Warren Buffett's argument for why wealthy Americans like him should pay more taxes — which raises fundamental questions about distributive justice, freedom, and property rights.

sumday, What is this kids day «Bobby does so I can too», It does not answer the fundamental question, is the action of selling to your enemy morally right or morally wrong?

Both carry on practices from the dim past but each has so industrialized the process with advanced technologies that the fundamental activity is transmuted into something new that raises questions beyond standard discussions of right and wrong.

Both carry on hoary practices from the dim past but each has so industrialized the process with advanced technologies that the fundamental activity is transmuted into something new that raises questions beyond standard discussions of right and wrong on battlefields or in the marketplace.

The fourth challenge arises from how war is conceived, for this is fundamental both for the question of a just resort to force and for right conduct in the use of such force.

Liberalism — a respect for human or natural rights; limits on the scope and power of public authority; state neutrality on fundamental questions of,....

On what other great question of human rights, in this case the most fundamental right, which is the right to be protected from willful killing, does Cafardi say «the battle is over - permanently»?

... Since man enjoys the capacity for a free personal choice in truth... the right to religious freedom should be viewed as innate to the fundamental dignity of every human person... all people are «impelled by nature and also bound by our moral obligation to seek the truth, especially religious truth» (Second Vatican Council, Dignitatis Humanae, 2)... let me express my sincere hope that your expertise in the fields of law, political science, sociology and economics will converge in these days to bring about fresh insights on this important question andthus bear much fruit now and into the future.

My hope is that the system of national surveillance will eventually accurately take into account provider type and intended place of birth, because many of our discussions right now are around safety; those are the most fundamental questions that people are asking.

The goal of each class series is to help expecting parents understand that they are in control of the decision - making process, that they have options at every stage, and to provide them with the fundamental understanding of those options needed to ask the right questions and make informed decisions in the moment.

Although Conaghan doesn't cover its development, I don't believe the structure was necessarily wrong but it did perhaps spend too much time looking at rights of the consumer, rather than asking some of the more fundamental questions about the stability of financial institutions here and in different parts of the world.

So we should be asking ourselves the fundamental question: if [our basic assumptions about what type of individuals appear suspicious] lead us to be right only 5 % of the time, shouldn't the criteria we are using to apprehend individuals be revised?

If it takes you this long to make up your mind about something so fundamental and you still have questions, then surely the right option is to stay with what you know, rather than risk our economy and security with a leap in the dark.

But serious people raising genuine problems are right to want a constitutional convention, while the fundamental question on the balance of powers between the two houses hangs in the air.

Citing six catalysts - the confusion over human rights and the rule of law, the unprecedented growth of the «database state», devolution and the pressure for greater decentralisation in England, the European Union and globalisation and questions about the eventual succession of Queen Elizabeth II, I predicted that the need for fundamental constitutional change would become unarguable within the next twenty years.

«The fundamental questions we face now — is it right to be cutting billions of pounds from public services and taking billions of pounds out of family budgets this financial year and next?

«To say to women in this state, you should consider organizing to make your voice heard, when the women just had their right to choose questioned — which is a fundamental right for women,» he said.

With exclusive access to Valle, Erin Lee Carr's unflinching documentary asks a fundamental question that challenges our beliefs about the criminal justice system, and even the very nature of right and wrong: can you be guilty of a crime you only thought about committing?

These are the fundamental human rights questions posed by this super-realistic docudrama which takes a long look at ethnic cleansing from both the perspective of the cleansed and from the point - of - view of the perpetrators of the crimes against humanity.

«Declaring education to be an implicit fundamental right would raise difficult constitutional questions about other essentials such as food, shelter, and health care,» say Lindseth, Testani, and Peifer, as well as questions about the adequacy of school funding levels about which education researchers do not agree.

Declaring education to be an implicit fundamental right would raise difficult constitutional questions about essentials such as food, shelter, and health care — none of which are mentioned in the federal Constitution.

Regardless of their contention that literacy is «uniquely significant to American civil life» because of its role in a «well - functioning democracy,» the Rodriguez court held that «the key to discovering whether education is «fundamental» is not to be found in comparisons of the relative societal significance of education»; the question is «whether there is a right to education explicitly or implicitly guaranteed by the Constitution.»

Answer on the question what is more important, public safety or fundamental rights was more obvious before.

Questioning is a fundamental element of pedagogy, one you could read endlessly around, but the reality is using questioning to challenge and engage all learners is demanding and potentially problematic toQuestioning is a fundamental element of pedagogy, one you could read endlessly around, but the reality is using questioning to challenge and engage all learners is demanding and potentially problematic toquestioning to challenge and engage all learners is demanding and potentially problematic to get right.

While fights and protests over a rough draft we disagree with may feel cathartic, it will not be as effective as working with diverse community, education and civil rights groups to answer this fundamental question and influence the vision for a plan to create great schools for all students.

The fundamental goal of closing duplicate questions is to help people find the right answer by getting all of those answers in one place.

We address all of these questions in Appendix A (below), but in summary, we think what's happening to BP right now is similar to the overall market in March 2009: the near - term fundamentals are terrible, nobody knows when they will improve, and fear - mongers dominate the headlines.

So, if the Buy - and - Holders got the fundamental question right, I think it makes sense to go with what they say about asset allocation and...

Although previously the test pieces and small works were considered peripheral to the major work, this exhibition argues that, as well as being beautiful and meaningful objects in their own right, they force us to ask fundamental and pressing questions, not just about what an artwork is, but about the work that art does in our culture.

The gay rights issue places the discussion of fundamental political question in a contemporary context.

Religious organizations have contributed to the dialogue, addressing such fundamental questions as the rights of poor people and developing nations.

Stoat argues that the fundamental question Scott Adams poses, How the heck can you — a non-expert — judge who is right?

These further questions are all part of the fundamental question «Did you build the right thing?»

The second fundamental question of «Did you build the thing right?»

Grey says the case «raises the most fundamental questions,» pitting fundamental Charter rights against aboriginal autonomy — but he's quick to point out that this is not the first time a group has said mixed marriage jeopardizes the survival of a culture.

In its judgment of 26 February 2013, the CJEU responded to the first two questions in the affirmative, and clarified that Article 53 of the Charter only allows national authorities to apply higher standards of protection of fundamental rights where an EU legal act calls for national implementing measures, but not where, as in this case, the EU legal act harmonises the law between the Member States.

The order contained three questions: (i) whether Article 4a (1) FD must be interpreted as prohibiting Member States from making the execution of an EAW subject to the possibility of retrial in cases where a conviction has been rendered in absentia; (ii) whether Article 4a (1) FD is valid in light of Articles 47 and 48 of the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights; and (iii) whether, under Article 53 of the Charter, it can grant a higher level of protection than that provided for under EU law.

Although Lord Hope recognised that the issue of balance was not mentioned in either Engel or Guzzardi and that it does not feature in the wording of Art 5, he was nevertheless of the opinion that: ``... there are sufficient indications elsewhere in the court's case law that the question of balance is inherent in the concepts that are enshrined in the Convention and that they have a part to play when consideration is being given to the scope of the first rank of fundamental rights that protect the physical security of the individual» (at [27]-RRB-.

However, the implications of the case reach beyond the strict interpretation of the Transparency Regulation to questions concerning the manner in which the EU reaches international arrangements and their compatibility with fundamental rights.

The Council of State accepted that some questions pertaining to the way in which the applicant experiences, sexually or otherwise, his sexual orientation or how and when the applicant became aware of his sexual orientation may be contrary to the right to personal integrity (art. 3 (1) Charter) and the right to private life as guaranteed in Articles 3 and 7 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights and asked the CJEU for guidance on this point.

Perhaps, if the reference is sent, the Court will simply reply that this question has already been answered — repeating its famous statement that Union Citizenship is destined to be the fundamental status of Europeans, so that those who have embraced it, by exercising its rights, can no longer have it taken away.

For that reason, the SCC submitted its first - ever preliminary reference to the CJEU questioning, in the sensitive part, whether under Article 53 of the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights the Spanish Constitution could grant a higher level of protection than that provided for under EU law.

The most fascinating question is whether for the first time the ECJ will authorise a national court to disapply an EU legal provision to protect its national constitutional identity or higher national standards of fundamental rights» protection.

An earlier attempt failed and some have questioned the added value of the Roadmap Directives to the standards provided by the ECHR and the Charter of Fundamental Rights.

Questions will focus on legal certainty, supremacy, the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU), the Charter of Fundamental Rights, and devolution.

Considering the discriminatory character of the disputed drawing in the calendar, the issue presented a question of the impact of the fundamental rights on the scope of application of parody exception.

Unfortunately, since the Court decided against the applicability of the Visa Code in the case of X and X, it was not required to look further into the question of whether Member States» authorities should assess applications made under Article 25 of the Visa Code in the light of Articles 4 and / or 18 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights or any other international obligation by which they are bound.