Not exact matches
The FG is plotting
to hide under the proposed legislation on hate speak
to unleash draconian rule over unsuspecting Nigerians who would be cunningly denied their
fundamental rights of
free speech.
The
right to free speech, including the
right to speak out about who should be elected
to public office, is a
fundamental American
right, essential
to democratic debate.
I began paying close attention
to the climate debate after I noticed that activists were trampling on a
fundamental human
right — that of
free speech.
The IRS denial, in short, hinges on the applicant's activities looking too much like a for - profit trade or business and also the following not qualifying as «charitable» --(1) preserving the
fundamental human
rights set forth in the United Nations Universal Declaration of Human Rights (b / c it is a declaration, not a treaty or law) and (2) safeguarding free speech in foreign countries (as the US Constitution's guarantee of free speech does not apply to residents or citizens of foreign count
rights set forth in the United Nations Universal Declaration of Human
Rights (b / c it is a declaration, not a treaty or law) and (2) safeguarding free speech in foreign countries (as the US Constitution's guarantee of free speech does not apply to residents or citizens of foreign count
Rights (b / c it is a declaration, not a treaty or law) and (2) safeguarding
free speech in foreign countries (as the US Constitution's guarantee of
free speech does not apply
to residents or citizens of foreign countries).
As a result, the
right to freedom of
speech in the form of the
right to discuss, debate and indeed lampoon religion is a
fundamental feature of a
free society, but the same arguments can not be applied
to discussion of race...»
And finally, D'Arcy Jenish writes about the October Crisis of 1970 in Legion Magazine (September, 2010) that «Tommy Douglas, leader of the federal New Democratic Party, accused Trudeau of using «a sledgehammer
to crack a peanut,» and as well «A quarter of a century later, in a memoir published in 1996, longtime Conservative aide and adviser Hugh Segal wrote that «Civil liberties, including the
right to free assembly, the
right to free speech and other
fundamental rights (were) suspended across the land.
Democracy is based on civil and political
rights, including the
fundamental right to information,
free speech, assembly, access
to justice and the
right to participate fully in public matters.
«The Supreme Court of Canada ruled in Canada (Human
Rights Commission) v. Taylor, [1990] 3 S.C.R. 892 that this legally prescribed limitation of fundamental Charter rights [Section 13 (1) of the Canadian Human Rights Act] was reasonable and justifiable, but warned that caution and restraint would be required in the application of the section so that the limitation on free speech would be minimized to the greatest possible extent.&
Rights Commission) v. Taylor, [1990] 3 S.C.R. 892 that this legally prescribed limitation of
fundamental Charter
rights [Section 13 (1) of the Canadian Human Rights Act] was reasonable and justifiable, but warned that caution and restraint would be required in the application of the section so that the limitation on free speech would be minimized to the greatest possible extent.&
rights [Section 13 (1) of the Canadian Human
Rights Act] was reasonable and justifiable, but warned that caution and restraint would be required in the application of the section so that the limitation on free speech would be minimized to the greatest possible extent.&
Rights Act] was reasonable and justifiable, but warned that caution and restraint would be required in the application of the section so that the limitation on
free speech would be minimized
to the greatest possible extent.»
Free (and offensive) speech is a fundamental right but so is the right to live in peace, free from ethnic viole
Free (and offensive)
speech is a
fundamental right but so is the
right to live in peace,
free from ethnic viole
free from ethnic violence.