Copyright laws are frequently the thin end of the wedge for the erosion of fundamental rights online, so even if you don't care who wins in the corporate David versus Goliath battle, remember
the Fundamental Right to Freedom of Expression applies to EVERY citizen — let's not let that get trampled underfoot.
«These are cases that can give rise to complex issues, but to avoid the potential chilling effect that might arise from high numbers of prosecutions in cases in which a communication might be considered grossly offensive, we must recognise
the fundamental right to freedom of expression and only proceed with prosecution when a communication is more than offensive, shocking or disturbing, even if distasteful or painful to those subjected to it.»
A German state has declared that Facebook's policy requiring that a user identify himself by his real name violates that state's law allowing the use of pseudonyms and contravenes
the fundamental right to freedom of expression on the Internet (see here for an Associated Press article).
The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms protects
the fundamental right to freedom of expression, whether the information expressed be false or true.
Sagay, a former Dean of the Faculty of Law, University of Benin and Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile - Ife, in an April 3 letter to Senate President Bukola Saraki, said though he was not served with any summons, he deemed it fit to join issues with members of the Senate on the violation of
his fundamental right to freedom of expression.
Nigerians will resist any attempt to mortgage
their fundamental rights to freedom of expression under the guise of hate speeches.»
CSISAC calls on OECD member states to take a stand to combat digital censorship and uphold international human rights standards, including
the fundamental rights to freedom of expression, to freedom of information, to privacy and to the protection of personal data, which are the cornerstones of democracy.
Not exact matches
Mrs Williams also said: «If the tribunal is suggesting that there are places in which an individual does not enjoy the
fundamental right to freedom of religious
expression, this is a cause for concern and could have a chilling effect on
freedom of belief and
expression.»
He sought, among other prayers in his suit, a declaration that his referral by the Senate and the Senate President's referral
to the Senate Committee on Ethics, Privileges and Public Petitions «for trial for expressing his opinion on the purport»
of the bill «is an act calculated
to interfere with or likely
to constitute a breach»
of his
fundamental human
right to freedom of expression without interference.
Therefore the Court found that expressing this kind
of opinions does not fall under the protection
of the
freedom of expression according
to article 10 (1)
of the European Convention
of Human
Rights and
Fundamental Freedoms.
The statement extends its call for
freedom for «all prisoners
of conscience» who have been jailed in Turkey — according
to the IPA's article --» solely for exercising their
fundamental human
right of freedom of expression.»
We are planning
to ask Europe's highest court
to assess whether ACTA is incompatible — in any way — with the EU's
fundamental rights and
freedoms, such as
freedom of expression and information or data protection and the
right to property in case
of intellectual property.
The Court noted, with reference
to its previous case - law, the importance
of the
fundamental rights engaged in the current context, namely the
right to privacy (Article 7), the
right to data protection (Article 8) and the
right to freedom of expression (Article 11)-LRB-[92]- [93]-RRB-.
Of course, freedom of expression was not unlimited and should be balanced with other fundamental rights at stake in this case — such as the right to dignity (Article 1 of the EU Charter on Fundamental Rights, «EU Charter») or the prohibition of discrimination on the basis of race or religion (Article 21 EU Charter
Of course,
freedom of expression was not unlimited and should be balanced with other fundamental rights at stake in this case — such as the right to dignity (Article 1 of the EU Charter on Fundamental Rights, «EU Charter») or the prohibition of discrimination on the basis of race or religion (Article 21 EU Charter
of expression was not unlimited and should be balanced with other
fundamental rights at stake in this case — such as the right to dignity (Article 1 of the EU Charter on Fundamental Rights, «EU Charter») or the prohibition of discrimination on the basis of race or religion (Article 21 E
fundamental rights at stake in this case — such as the right to dignity (Article 1 of the EU Charter on Fundamental Rights, «EU Charter») or the prohibition of discrimination on the basis of race or religion (Article 21 EU Cha
rights at stake in this case — such as the
right to dignity (Article 1
of the EU Charter on Fundamental Rights, «EU Charter») or the prohibition of discrimination on the basis of race or religion (Article 21 EU Charter
of the EU Charter on
Fundamental Rights, «EU Charter») or the prohibition of discrimination on the basis of race or religion (Article 21 E
Fundamental Rights, «EU Charter») or the prohibition of discrimination on the basis of race or religion (Article 21 EU Cha
Rights, «EU Charter») or the prohibition
of discrimination on the basis of race or religion (Article 21 EU Charter
of discrimination on the basis
of race or religion (Article 21 EU Charter
of race or religion (Article 21 EU Charter).
With reference
to the
right to freedom of expression under the New Zealand Bill
of Rights Act 1990, McGrath J pointed to s 5 which renders all fundamental rights and freedoms subject to such reasonable limits prescribed by law as can be demonstrably justified in a free and democratic so
Rights Act 1990, McGrath J pointed
to s 5 which renders all
fundamental rights and freedoms subject to such reasonable limits prescribed by law as can be demonstrably justified in a free and democratic so
rights and
freedoms subject
to such reasonable limits prescribed by law as can be demonstrably justified in a free and democratic society.
As such, CCLA had urged the Court
to adopt an approach that recognizes
freedom of expression and limit any order that might violate this
fundamental right.
The codes
of conduct need
to strike a careful balance between allowing
freedom of expression (which is a
fundamental right of all UK citizens enshrined under Article 10
of the European Convention on Human
Rights), and protecting the rights of other individuals and employees not to be subject to harassment or inappropriate co
Rights), and protecting the
rights of other individuals and employees not to be subject to harassment or inappropriate co
rights of other individuals and employees not
to be subject
to harassment or inappropriate comment.
After having reiterated that the parties
to the proceedings were each entitled
to fundamental rights of equal value, i.e.,
freedom of expression for the daily, and the
right to respect for private and family life for the doctor, the appeal court emphasised that the
right to digital oblivion was established by the Court
of Justice in its Google Spain ruling.
«But what the WJP finds worrisome is the decline in the rankings
of 71 countries in upholding
fundamental rights: such as the
right to life and security, due process, absence
of discrimination,
freedom of expression and religion,
right to privacy,
freedom of association, and labor
rights.
Before the Law Society can start arguing that our
freedom of expression, just about the most
fundamental right we have, is not protected by the Charter, surely the Law Society would have
to prove racism is flagrant and widespread and that such evidence would have
to be clear and compelling.
Justice Fish explained that the
fundamental and closely related Charter
rights of freedom of expression and
freedom of communication «both depend for their vitality on public access
to information
of public interest.»
Since 2013,
fundamental human
rights, including the
right to a fair trial and
freedom of expression and assembly, have been diminished on an ongoing basis by broad security legislation.