In his book Fundamentalism (Westminster, 1978) James Barr argues that
fundamentalism arises out of a particular religious tradition: the revival experience of conversion and the intensely personal acceptance of Jesus Christ as Lord and Savior.
Every religion is based on certain fundamentals; and
fundamentalism arises when these fundamentals are imperiled, obscured or ignored.
To say
fundamentalism arises in a time of crises is like saying that
fundamentalism arises whenever time is moving forward.
As a social scientist, I also question the assertion that
fundamentalism arises or gains prominence in times of crisis, actual or perceived.
Not exact matches
The result in Europe has been a mass exodus from the traditional churches which cling to the orthodox views, while in America there has
arisen a much stronger
fundamentalism.
Fundamentalism tends to
arise in lower and lower - middle classes at times of class mobility.
Here, too, there is a certain dated spirit about the book that may
arise from Barr's own more immediate emergence from
fundamentalism.
Having
arisen out of a profound aversion to the modern spirit,
fundamentalism finds «humanism.»
The threat to this idea of secularism
arises form religious
fundamentalism which is afraid of insecurity through change in traditional religious dogmas, ritual practices of purity and impurity in social laws; the threat also comes from communalism which seeks political power for one's religious community or in the case of Hindutva wants to establish a Hindu state.
That anxiety does not
arise from theoretical / fictional personas, but rather from 9/11, Jihad
fundamentalism, Homeland Security, and the war in Iraq.