More
fundamentally, the Committee observes that while the Review implicitly assumes that «only a rigid, cut - and - dried rule would be sufficient because leaving scope for flexibility or the exercise of judgement on the part of the House of Lords would be undesirable», the Review simultaneously says that the Lords should trust the
Government to ensure that, in the future, Bills contain «an appropriate level of detail» so as to guard
against constitutionally improper reliance upon secondary legislation.