David Weinberger lent voice to
the fundamentally flawed arguments of digital evangelists everywhere (11 February, p 30).
Not exact matches
I also don't think I need to point out to you that using only part of a definition
fundamentally changes the word and definition itself, so to take only parts out to prove what atheism does do as «religious» is
flawed and destroys your
argument.
On the second count, the
argument for how dividend payments moderate price declines is
fundamentally flawed.
The
argument has always been
fundamentally flawed, because as The Escalator shows, it's based entirely on cherry picking short - term noise in the data.
In each case their
arguments have been proven demonstrably wrong, and yet they keep coming up with new variations on the same
fundamentally flawed premise.
The
argument that the apparent correlation between the onset of the industrial revolution (circa 1850) and in - phase gradually increasing global temperatures is itself proof that Anthropogenic Global Warming (AGW) caused by increased concentrations of CO2 is
fundamentally flawed (by the way, correlation is not necessarily proof of causation).