Sentences with phrase «fundamentally flawed paper»

The first week of September began with the editor of Remote Sensing resigning in order to take responsibility for publishing Roy Spencer's fundamentally flawed paper.

Not exact matches

Ron and Shamir seem to have used flow analysis of the Bitcoin blockchain to reach these conclusions, as they did in their first paper on the subject, however without doing the required research into the actual identities of the Bitcoin address owners, using flow analysis among them to determine relationships between them is fundamentally flawed.

This latter point was missed in the review process, explaining why I perceive this paper to be fundamentally flawed and therefore wrongly accepted by the journal.»

This week and next, I plan to write a series of commentaries on the paper, which I believe is fundamentally flawed.

In one fell swoop, Dessler has demonstrated that the only two modern papers arguing for low climate sensitivity are both fundamentally flawed, and their assumptions are contradicted by observational data.

Various other scientific groups pointed out several flaws in the methods and assumptions in each of their publications, and in fact one editor resigned because he felt his journal had failed its task of conducting rigorous peer - review in publishing a fundamentally flawed 2011 Spencer and Braswell paper (black in the first graphic).

Auctioning 100 % of allowances is also the main recommendation in Open Europe's white paper, «Europe's Dirty Secret: Why the EU ETS Isn't Working», for improving the working of the EU's cap - and - trade scheme, although Open Europe concludes that cap - and - trade is fundamentally flawed in ways that can't be fixed.

Worst of all, as Anthony Watts notes, Christy cited the incomplete, unpublished, fundamentally flawed preliminary paper on which Watts and Christy are both co-authors:

Then there are the people who write papers that are actually quite marginal in what they call into question, but their authors will sometimes hype those papers in the popular press, perhaps claiming that they call into question the foundations of climate science — or perhaps publishing something so fundamentally flawed it should have never seen the light of day.