Not exact matches
This is the 10th edition of the report hailed as the «Bible for socially progressive foundations,
religious groups, pension
funds, and tax - exempt
organizations»
by the Chicago Tribune.
Researchers asked 1,000 Americans in a phone survey, «Should student
religious organizations, recognized
by publicly
funded colleges, be allowed to require their leaders to hold specific beliefs?»
In an attempt to give
religious groups some guidance in navigating between Charitable Choice's front and back ends, some
religious organizations have begun work on a «Code of Conduct»
by which FBOs accepting government
funds regulated
by Charitable Choice would pledge to operate.
That is, if a Jewish FBO runs an hour long, publicly
funded computer skills training class that includes a one - minute prayer
by the instructor at the beginning of class, that FBO is not engaging in «sectarian instruction»; it is simply being true to its character as a
religious organization.
Some men contend that no governmental
funds, local or Federal, ought to be expended
by religious organizations in such welfare activities as homes for the aged, child care, orphanages, and hospitals.
The executive order in question, issued
by President Clinton and affirmed
by President Bush in 2002, states that while
religious organizations that receive federal
funds can not discriminate against beneficiaries of their programs, they «may retain
religious terms in its
organization's name, select its board members on a
religious basis, and include
religious references in its
organization's mission statements and other chartering or governing documents.»
Most Americans assume that the separation of church and state is a fundamental principle deeply rooted in American constitutionalism; that the First Amendment was intended to ensure that government does not involve itself with religion (and vice versa); and that contemporary debates over such vexing issues as school prayer, voucher programs, government
funding of faith - based
organizations, and the rights of
religious minorities represent ongoing attempts to realize the separation intended
by the Founders and like - minded early Americans.
«President Obama should ask Imam Feisal Abdul Rauf where the
funding for the mosque is coming from and whether he views Hamas as a terror
organization before he tries to deflect the very real security concerns at issue
by instead lecturing New Yorkers on matters of
religious tolerance.»
The Trinity case was filed
by a Missouri church that had been denied a state grant to help pay for playground resurfacing, because state policy prevented any public
funds from being given to
religious organizations.
Arizona passed a scholarship program
funded by tax credits and subsequently found itself sued
by the ACLU (and nominal plaintiffs that it rounded up) because many of the scholarship
organizations were
religious and sent recipients to
religious schools.
In an analogous case, it relied on the free speech clause to strike down the University of Virginia's (UVA) refusal to allow a
religious organization run
by students to receive
funds that were made available to secular
organizations.
In particular, the study found severe accountability problems with both programs, most notably: they do not serve students in rural areas where there were virtually no private schools or scholarship
organizations (SOs) present; they
fund primarily
religious schools, which are not required to be accredited or adhere to the same standards for curricula as public schools; they do not require the same testing requirements as public schools, making it impossible to gauge student achievement; and they do not require reporting
by schools or SOs.
Between the 1860s and 1990s more than 150,000 First Nations, Inuit, and Métis children were required to attend Indian Residential Schools, institutions operated
by religious organizations funded by the Federal Government.
(1) an interest in the individual holdings within a mutual or common investment
fund; (2) an interest in securities held
by an educational,
religious, charitable, fraternal, or civic
organization in which the judge or the judge's spouse, domestic partner, parent, or child serves as a director, an officer, an advisor, or other participant; (3) a deposit in a financial institution or deposits or proprietary interests the judge may maintain as a member of a mutual savings association or credit union, or similar proprietary interests; or (4) an interest in the issuer of government securities held
by the judge.
It is also generally permissible for a judge to serve as an usher or a food server or preparer, or to perform similar functions, at
fund - raising events sponsored
by educational,
religious, charitable, fraternal, or civic
organizations.