Exploring income shows us that student groups in districts with more low - income students tend to be less
funded than their peers in districts with fewer low - income students.
Connecticut's education funding system is broken — with charter school students receiving on average $ 4,000 less in
funding than their peers in district schools.
And for TPSB to claim those families deserve less
funding than their peers in the district's system is discriminatory.
«Policies and practices put in place by city leaders a number of years ago have yielded greater equity over time, although charter students continue to receive less public
funding than their peers in district schools,» he said.
Not exact matches
For instance, women - run companies are far more likely to get
funding through
peer investing
than through traditional
funds.
While a
fund with higher
than average fees isn't necessarily bad, its manager will have to do better
than his
peers to deliver a comparable return on investment.
The
fund has beaten more
than 75 % of its
peers over the past three, five, 10, and 15 years.
iShares Core ETFs have outperformed more
than 75 % of their mutual
fund peers on average over the past 10 years1
Once the momentum of this flow of money gets into full speed, public
fund managers search for ways to produce returns that are better
than their
peers, so the window begins to open for IPOs.
Historically, early - stage venture returns for small
funds — defined as those with less
than $ 250 million of committed capital — have outpaced those of their larger
peers.
And 93 % of our
funds have performed better
than their
peer - group averages over the last 10 years.
A recent poll conducted on behalf of RBCsup ® / sup finds that students who receive less
than one - quarter of their
funding from parents feel more confident in their financial decision making and are more likely to make and stick to a budget compared to their
peers who receive more financial support from their parents.
A company that has taken on lots of debt to
fund expansion will likely have a better P / E ratio
than its
peers as the money it is borrowing doesn't reduce earnings.
XLE pulls its stocks from the S&P 500 rather
than the total market, so its portfolio is somewhat smaller
than that of
peer funds, and it favors large - caps.
Listed companies are larger and better connected
than their unlisted
peers, and often have access to state - bank
funding, so the mounting backlog hits smaller outfits hardest.
Specifically, STORE Capital retains a larger
than average proportion (most
peers retain just 10 % to 20 %) of AFFO to
fund growth.
Peer - to - peer (P2P) lending, also known as crowdlending, is similar to bank loans in that borrowers receive funding and are required to make regular monthly repayments with interest, but the funds are raised through a crowd of investors rather than a b
Peer - to -
peer (P2P) lending, also known as crowdlending, is similar to bank loans in that borrowers receive funding and are required to make regular monthly repayments with interest, but the funds are raised through a crowd of investors rather than a b
peer (P2P) lending, also known as crowdlending, is similar to bank loans in that borrowers receive
funding and are required to make regular monthly repayments with interest, but the
funds are raised through a crowd of investors rather
than a bank.
Republican Council members, a decided minority in the city, traditionally bring home less in discretionary
funds than their Democratic
peers.
In «From
funding agencies to scientific agency: Collective allocation of science
funding as an alternative to
peer review,» the researchers proposed a
funding model that they claim would be simpler, cheaper, and fairer
than the traditional
funding system, and more amenable to high - risk research and chance discovery.
He published more
than 20 papers in
peer - reviewed journals and won additional
funding from KAUST in internal competitions designed to keep faculty members» grant - writing skills sharp.
But P. Kay Lund, director of the NIH Division of Biomedical Research Workforce in the Office of Extramural Research, and Misty Heggeness, a labor economist in the same division, note in a joint statement to Science Careers that the detected impact of newly received NIH
funding on mobility is «minimal» and less
than that of children's ages and
peer environment quality.
Simonov said the inability of financial experts to make better investment decisions
than their untrained
peers is likely due to a lack of talent and the fact that succeeding in the mutual
fund market is an extremely difficult task.
She published more
than 180
peer review papers, is
funded by several granting agencies, including the Michael J Fox Foundation, and sits on several national and international review panels.
Professor Prakash's research work is well
funded and has been exceptionally productive, groundbreaking and successful with more
than 660
peer - reviewed scientific publications, 11 books and over 40 patents and patent applications.
He has received more
than 70 grant - years of
peer - reviewed research
funding and authored more
than 300 research papers.
Over the course of his career, he has served on grant review panels of multiple
funding agencies, actively participated in the development of national and international nutrition policy, authored over 300 research papers, has been awarded more
than seventy grant - years of
peer - reviewed research
funding and given hundreds of lectures around the world.
For example the research revealed that second graders in RF schools actually spent less time reading
than peers in schools without RF
funding, for the sake of what was described as «high quality» instruction.
In 2007 they approved
funding for the first public Waldorf methods high school, in the Sacramento Unified School District; and (3) Three key findings on urban public schools with Waldorf methods: (a) In their final year, the students in the study's four California case study public Waldorf - methods elementary schools match the top ten of
peer sites on the 2006 California test scores and well outperform the average of their
peers statewide; (b) According to teacher, administrator and mentor reports, they achieve these high test scores by focusing on those new three R's — rather
than on rote learning and test prep — in a distinct fashion laid out by the Waldorf model and (c) A key focus is on artistic learning, not just for students but, more importantly perhaps, for the adults.
By exploring districts» racial makeups, we see that across the board, Illinois has historically
funded student groups in majority - White school districts better
than their
peers in districts with more students of color.
Across the board, student groups in poorer districts are less resourced
than peers in wealthier districts and will receive more new
funding as a result.
Higher needs populations of students as defined in Vincent v. Voight (FRL, SpN, ELL) are at a greater
funding and spending disadvantage
than their more affluent
peers since 2004.
On average, Arizona charter students are
funding about $ 1,100 less
than their average district
peer.
In the third of a five - part series, John Dickens looks at who exactly is benefiting as schools receive more
than # 6bn of pupil premium
funding and questions if is really closing the attainment gap between disadvantaged pupils and their wealthier
peers
Wisconsin's private voucher and public charter schools receive, on average, $ 2,200 less in per pupil
funding than their public school
peers.
One such study was released this April, showing that students in the only federally
funded voucher program, in Washington, D.C., performed worse on standardized tests within a year after entering D.C. private schools
than peers who did not participate.
This followed an earlier study from the department finding that «many high - poverty schools receive less
than their fair share of state and local
funding... leav (ing) students in high - poverty schools with fewer resources
than schools attended by their wealthier
peers.»
For example, African American children born in poverty who participated in early childhood education programs had higher graduation rates, higher adult earnings, and fewer arrests
than their
peers.102 A similar study found that students who participated in early intervention programs maintained higher high school GPAs, were two times more likely to have attended a four - year college, and were more likely to hold a job
than their
peers.103 Furthermore, research finds that participation in state -
funded preschool programs improves children's language, literacy, and mathematical skills.104
If you see a
fund with higher returns
than its
peers then you must check that where are these returns coming from.
Prosper is a
peer - to -
peer lending service, which provides a different type of
funding for loans
than those that traditional financial institutions offer.
The
fund trails more
than 80 % of its
peers over pretty much every trailing measurement period.
Hard to know whether that will help: over the five years under its current management, the
fund has been a lot more volatile (bigger maximum drawdown but much faster recovery) and more profitable
than its
peers; the question is whether, in uncertain times, investors will buy that combo — even after the generous cost reduction.
In fact, 93 % of Vanguard mutual
funds performed better
than their
peer - group averages over the past 10 years.
Quantum's
fund, despite having significant cash holdings, has managed to deliver a performance at par or sometimes better
than its
peers.
Also, the Sharpe ratio (3 year) is 1.4 which is better
than peers and indicates that the
fund has better risk - adjusted performance and also indicates that higher returns do not come with an excess of additional risk.
The risk metrics for the
fund is healthy with standard deviation at 3.36 that is better
than peers having similar profile.
The
fund is up an average of 9 % a year over five years, better
than 99 % of its foreign large - value
peers... The goal is to offer investors broad exposure to international markets, but in a portfolio that doesn't simply mimic its benchmark, the MSCI EAFE Index.
The Value
Fund (blue) not only returned more
than twice what their global equity
peers made, but also essential brushed aside the market collapse at the end of the 1990s bubble and the stagnation of «the lost decade.»
* And 93 % of our mutual
funds performed better
than their
peer - group averages over the past 10 years.
Portfolio allocations show the
fund to be more small - cap oriented
than its
peers, with a 15 - 22 per cent allocation to Small - Cap Stocks.
Even though the
fund suffered a smaller decline in 2008
than its
peer world allocation
funds did -LRB--20.6 vs. -29 % per Morningstar), it significantly declined against its reference portfolio of ETFs.