Not exact matches
The agreement, reached as part of a $ 168 billion budget, would apply to independent contractors and the private sector, ban taxpayer -
funded settlements for individual harassment
claims and end mandatory
arbitration.
Any
claim, dispute, or controversy («Claim») arising out of or relating in any way to: i) this Agreement; ii) the Savings Account; iii) your establishment of the Savings Account; iv) your use of the Savings Account; v) the amount of available funds in the Savings Account; vi) advertisements, promotions or oral or written statements related to the Savings Account; vii) the benefits and services related to the Savings Account; or viii) transactions made using the Savings Account, no matter how described, pleaded or styled, shall be FINALLY and EXCLUSIVELY resolved by binding individual arbitration conducted by the American Arbitration Association («AAA») under its Consumer Arbitration R
claim, dispute, or controversy («
Claim») arising out of or relating in any way to: i) this Agreement; ii) the Savings Account; iii) your establishment of the Savings Account; iv) your use of the Savings Account; v) the amount of available funds in the Savings Account; vi) advertisements, promotions or oral or written statements related to the Savings Account; vii) the benefits and services related to the Savings Account; or viii) transactions made using the Savings Account, no matter how described, pleaded or styled, shall be FINALLY and EXCLUSIVELY resolved by binding individual arbitration conducted by the American Arbitration Association («AAA») under its Consumer Arbitration R
Claim») arising out of or relating in any way to: i) this Agreement; ii) the Savings Account; iii) your establishment of the Savings Account; iv) your use of the Savings Account; v) the amount of available
funds in the Savings Account; vi) advertisements, promotions or oral or written statements related to the Savings Account; vii) the benefits and services related to the Savings Account; or viii) transactions made using the Savings Account, no matter how described, pleaded or styled, shall be FINALLY and EXCLUSIVELY resolved by binding individual
arbitration conducted by the American
Arbitration Association («AAA») under its Consumer
Arbitration Rules.
This
arbitration provision also does not limit or constrain the Bank's right to interplead
funds in the event of
claims to Collateral Account
funds by several parties.
He enjoys a particular expertise in arranging bespoke
funding solutions for clients pursuing international
arbitration claims, including investment treaty
arbitrations.
According to TheJudge's website, «Third - party
funders view legal
claims as financial assets, in which they may invest in exchange for a return based upon the success of the
funded litigation or
arbitration.
We expect to see more
funded claims across continental Europe, particularly in Italy and Spain, with a rising number of
arbitration cases in those jurisdictions, and in Hong Kong and Singapore, where attitudes towards
funding are warming up.
The benefits of this portfolio model are many: for the client, the litigation or
arbitration can be fully
funded, relieving the client of the cost burden of pursuing the
claim.
There is a huge opportunity to
fund meritorious
claims across a range of complex litigation and
arbitration situations and we have a strong pipeline of potential cases.»
Arbitration —
Claim in arbitration rejected and costs awarded against claimant — Appeal against arbitration award for serious irregularity — Application by defendant for security for the costs of the application and security for the costs award — Effect of claim being funded by litigation funders — Arbitration Act 1996, sections 68 (2)(d), 70 (5) and 70
Claim in
arbitration rejected and costs awarded against claimant — Appeal against
arbitration award for serious irregularity — Application by defendant for security for the costs of the application and security for the costs award — Effect of
claim being funded by litigation funders — Arbitration Act 1996, sections 68 (2)(d), 70 (5) and 70
claim being
funded by litigation
funders —
Arbitration Act 1996, sections 68 (2)(d), 70 (5) and 70 (6).
2015 saw the total value of
claims funded by Therium break the $ 5 billion mark with litigation and
arbitration cases in the UK, Europe, Asia - Pacific and in the Americas, including high profile cases such as the shareholder group action against Lloyds Banking Group over the acquisition of HBOS at the peak of the financial crisis.
There is no doubt that the litigation
funding market is becoming increasingly recognised for the value it brings, such as providing financial resources to enable litigation and
arbitration to take place, on both an individual case and portfolio basis, and de-risking and monetising
claims.
The
funding of
arbitration claims has entered the mainstream with increasing numbers of claimants offsetting the multi-year exposure of capital through bespoke
funding arrangements.
Calunius Capital advises the Calunius
Funds on the origination, assessment and execution of
funding transactions linked to large scale commercial litigation and
arbitration claims, both in domestic and international contexts.
Brokered numerous
funding and insurance arrangements for cases brought by SMEs and international claimants pursuing
arbitration and international
arbitration claims under the auspices of, amongst others, the ICC, ICSID and LCIA.
Represented an American rice exporter in a
claim filed under the
arbitration rules of the Rice Millers Association for
funds due under a contract with the Government of Iraq.
-- On August 14, 1993, Ms. Janousek, a pedestrian, was struck by an uninsured vehicle driven by Shawn Montreul — After hitting Ms. Janousek, the vehicle also struck a nearby parking lot fence — The debris from the fence damaged three unoccupied vehicles in the parking lot — These vehicles were insured by Halifax Insurance Company, Canadian Surety Company and Mutual Insurance Company — None of the three vehicles came into contact with Ms. Janousek or the uninsured vehicle — As Ms. Janousek had no automobile insurance of her own to access for payment of accident benefits she submitted a
claim for benefits with the Motor Vehicle Accident
Claims Fund (MVACF)-- Originally the MVACF accepted the
claim but on March 24, 1994 the payments ceased as the
Fund believed that one of the three insurance companies should be responsible for the payments — All three companies received an application for accident benefits for Ms. Janousek but denied the
claim — The insurance companies were not able to come to an agreement and resolve disputes through mediation — Ms. Janousek then applied for
arbitration under the Insurance Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. I. 8.
By taking a «direct financial interest» in the
arbitration, and by taking a measure of control over how the
claim is prosecuted and any settlement decision, the
funder becomes a direct party to the
arbitration.
* When a REALTOR ® requests
arbitration to determine which of multiple respondents is entitled to disputed
funds, or where a party makes no
claim to the disputed
funds, that party may not be assessed an
arbitration filing fee.