Sentences with phrase «funding as the biggest problem»

In the latest poll, 19 % of respondents cited school funding as the biggest problem, down from a record high of 36 % in 2010 and 2011, the peak of the recession years.

Not exact matches

Further, Ayew has scored just nine goals in 50 games for the club, and so if Villa get the # 10m that they are seeking, as per the report, which shouldn't be a problem for the big - spending Chinese outfit, then it looks as though Bruce will be armed with significant funds to bring in his own players.

As much as I would like to hate your comment above I have to agree with what you've said here I know there are a hardcore of bloggers on here that will be derisory and downright insulting (Keyboard warriors are always really tough) but unless we have the two new additions we need then we will sadly be another fourth spot contender again, its as simple as that the current squad is nearly there but nearly there is not THERE and I hate to say it but I think its gonna be another case of Wenger stubbornly trying to convince the world he is a genius by winning things without spending much OR by lamenting the injury problems and bad refs and being desultory about big oil funded clubs while the Club we love turns a fat profit for the board and we see no silverware at alAs much as I would like to hate your comment above I have to agree with what you've said here I know there are a hardcore of bloggers on here that will be derisory and downright insulting (Keyboard warriors are always really tough) but unless we have the two new additions we need then we will sadly be another fourth spot contender again, its as simple as that the current squad is nearly there but nearly there is not THERE and I hate to say it but I think its gonna be another case of Wenger stubbornly trying to convince the world he is a genius by winning things without spending much OR by lamenting the injury problems and bad refs and being desultory about big oil funded clubs while the Club we love turns a fat profit for the board and we see no silverware at alas I would like to hate your comment above I have to agree with what you've said here I know there are a hardcore of bloggers on here that will be derisory and downright insulting (Keyboard warriors are always really tough) but unless we have the two new additions we need then we will sadly be another fourth spot contender again, its as simple as that the current squad is nearly there but nearly there is not THERE and I hate to say it but I think its gonna be another case of Wenger stubbornly trying to convince the world he is a genius by winning things without spending much OR by lamenting the injury problems and bad refs and being desultory about big oil funded clubs while the Club we love turns a fat profit for the board and we see no silverware at alas simple as that the current squad is nearly there but nearly there is not THERE and I hate to say it but I think its gonna be another case of Wenger stubbornly trying to convince the world he is a genius by winning things without spending much OR by lamenting the injury problems and bad refs and being desultory about big oil funded clubs while the Club we love turns a fat profit for the board and we see no silverware at alas that the current squad is nearly there but nearly there is not THERE and I hate to say it but I think its gonna be another case of Wenger stubbornly trying to convince the world he is a genius by winning things without spending much OR by lamenting the injury problems and bad refs and being desultory about big oil funded clubs while the Club we love turns a fat profit for the board and we see no silverware at all.

They have scored just as many, eight, but their defence is their biggest and well known weakness this season and that is certainly an area that needs strengthening during January, although funds are limited at the club and Phil Brown may have to fix the defensive problems without cash, somehow.

MO MONEY MO PROBLEMS — Johnson proposes cutting Council initiatives in search for Fair Fares cash — POLITICO's Gloria Pazmino and Brendan Cheney: Speaker Corey Johnson is floating a proposal to defund some Council spending initiatives as a way to pay for the Fair Fares plan, the Council's biggest budget request — and one that Mayor Bill de Blasio has said he has no intention of funding.

A big «Invest to Save» in Health Prevention an injection of invest to save funding to tackle our biggest population challenges, in particular obesity, fuel poverty, employment for those with health problems and harm from alcohol, as part of a wider locally led health and wellbeing plan

It's a big problem that when there is an emerging threat, we are not able to surge or work as rapidly as we should, as a result of a lack of additional funding and legislative authority.

Indeed, according to Roddam Narasimha, the DST Year - of - Science Professor at Jawaharlal Nehru Centre for Advanced Scientific Research in Jakkur, Bangalore, the big problem with research in India's university system is not so much funding as «the difficulty universities have in attracting gifted scientists from within the country or abroad.»

«IGERT funding is instrumental in drawing faculty into bioinformatics as mentors,» says Fox, revealing that one of the biggest problems UCLA's bioinformatics program faces is recruiting new faculty.

Physiological tremor can be a big problem in certain situations, such as combat, and Pathak's work (funded by the U.S. Army Research Laboratories) focused on developing actuators in military equipment and weapons to offset users» tremors.

The polls by the American Federation of Teachers (AFT) and Phi Delta Kappa International (PDK) found a perceived lack of funding to be the biggest problem facing schools in respondents» communities, with AFT also identifying local and federal education budget cuts as the most worrisome trend in education.

Seeing funding as a top problem peaks among college graduates, Democrats, liberals, and those with $ 100,000 + incomes, with about one - third of each group citing it as a big issue.

«I think School Board members will have a big conscience problem, and a lot of hot taxpayers, if they provide funds to a source which is not accountable to them as board members,» Matthews said.

About half still consider California's budget situation a big problem for K — 12 education and view state funding for local schools as inadequate.

Moreover, the EdNext pollsters theorize that support for increases in funding rises in election years, when this issue is most hotly debated, and it's therefore unsurprising that it was seen as the biggest problem in public education.

If you are so inclined, you may also want to read the recent Washington Post (10.24.16) article, entitled «The big problem with the Obama administration's new teacher - education regulations», in which the chair of Connecticut College's Education Department co-wrote that the «academy provisions» which were incorporated into ESSA (after initially being developed by the two charter lobbyist organizations New Schools Venture Fund and Relay Graduate School of Education) would exempt «entrepreneurial «start - up programs» (i.e. teacher preparation «academies»)... from many of the requirements that states will enforce for other programs — such as hiring faculty who hold advanced degrees or conduct research, holding students to certain credit hours or course sequences, or securing accreditation from the field's accrediting bodies.»

If they want a little more diversity, they could always go with target date funds, as long as they are aware about the biggest problems with target date funds.

One of the biggest problems is that all that money you have tirelessly socked away in online brokerages and mutual funds for so many years will be treated as taxable income when you spend it.

The only problem now is that when all the big fund managers will decide to withdraw from the bond market then we shall see a steeper jump as Government of Canada is not likely to intervene.

The problem is that most people don't fund it as regularly as they should, even though $ 100 / month makes a big difference.

There's just one problem: Many of these funds are unstable, with several slashing their payouts regularly and seeing big price drops as a result.

Another problem with excessive management fees in relation to performance fees is that they encourage hedge fund advisors to grow their funds as big as possible and just collect the annuity that the management fees become when they are running multibillion dollar portfolios.

Small problems such as missing matching money and high fund fees add up to big dollars over decades.

Hello I would like to share my master plan of new जीवन anand policy My age is 30 I have purchased 7 policies of 1 lac sum assured and each maturity year term 26 to 32 I purchased in 2017 Along with I have purchased 3 policies of same jivananad of 11lac each Maturity year term 33,34,35 Now what will I have to pay is rs, 130000 premium per year means 370rs per day At age of 55 in year 2047 I will start getting return, of, 3lac maturity per year till 2054 For 7policies of i lac I buyed for safety of paying next 10 years premium of 130000 As year by year my liability goes on decreasing and at the age of 62 to 65 I get my major part of maturity amount around 16000000 one crore sixty lac Along with 4000000 sum assured continued for rest of life So from above example it is true that you can make money to make money for you You can enjoy a large sum by just paying 370 per day and you will feel you have earned 19000000 / 35 years = 1500 per day And assume if I die after 5 years then in this case also my spouse will get 7500000 as death claim against 650000 paid premium Whats bad in this A asset is getting created for you It is a property of 2 crores which you are buying for 35 year installment If you make fd of 2000000 Lacs against this policy u will get 135000 interest per year to pay for 35 years If u buy a flat for 20 lack in 2017 there is no scope of valuation of Flat will be 2 crores But as I described you are creating a class asset for your beloved easily just investing 10500 per year for 35 years And too buy a term of 50 Lacs with it And rest you earn deposit in ppf Keep in mind if you will survive then only ppf will create corpus for you but in lic your family is insured to a higher extent till 1 crore with term including And its sufficient if you are earning 100000per Month no problem for investing of 10 % in New जीवन anand with rest 90 % you go with ppf, mutual funds, equity, gold, lottery, real estate any thing but keep 10 % for new jeewan anand it's a class if you understand it properly and after all if you rely only on term there are more chances of rejecting claims as one thing is sure cheap things just come under warranty but lic brand is guaranteed because in case of demise if your nominee doesn't get claim then your all hardwork is going to be waste so think and invest take long term and bigger sum assured for least premium You can assign your policy for taking flat or property it is a legal asset of you But term neveAs year by year my liability goes on decreasing and at the age of 62 to 65 I get my major part of maturity amount around 16000000 one crore sixty lac Along with 4000000 sum assured continued for rest of life So from above example it is true that you can make money to make money for you You can enjoy a large sum by just paying 370 per day and you will feel you have earned 19000000 / 35 years = 1500 per day And assume if I die after 5 years then in this case also my spouse will get 7500000 as death claim against 650000 paid premium Whats bad in this A asset is getting created for you It is a property of 2 crores which you are buying for 35 year installment If you make fd of 2000000 Lacs against this policy u will get 135000 interest per year to pay for 35 years If u buy a flat for 20 lack in 2017 there is no scope of valuation of Flat will be 2 crores But as I described you are creating a class asset for your beloved easily just investing 10500 per year for 35 years And too buy a term of 50 Lacs with it And rest you earn deposit in ppf Keep in mind if you will survive then only ppf will create corpus for you but in lic your family is insured to a higher extent till 1 crore with term including And its sufficient if you are earning 100000per Month no problem for investing of 10 % in New जीवन anand with rest 90 % you go with ppf, mutual funds, equity, gold, lottery, real estate any thing but keep 10 % for new jeewan anand it's a class if you understand it properly and after all if you rely only on term there are more chances of rejecting claims as one thing is sure cheap things just come under warranty but lic brand is guaranteed because in case of demise if your nominee doesn't get claim then your all hardwork is going to be waste so think and invest take long term and bigger sum assured for least premium You can assign your policy for taking flat or property it is a legal asset of you But term neveas death claim against 650000 paid premium Whats bad in this A asset is getting created for you It is a property of 2 crores which you are buying for 35 year installment If you make fd of 2000000 Lacs against this policy u will get 135000 interest per year to pay for 35 years If u buy a flat for 20 lack in 2017 there is no scope of valuation of Flat will be 2 crores But as I described you are creating a class asset for your beloved easily just investing 10500 per year for 35 years And too buy a term of 50 Lacs with it And rest you earn deposit in ppf Keep in mind if you will survive then only ppf will create corpus for you but in lic your family is insured to a higher extent till 1 crore with term including And its sufficient if you are earning 100000per Month no problem for investing of 10 % in New जीवन anand with rest 90 % you go with ppf, mutual funds, equity, gold, lottery, real estate any thing but keep 10 % for new jeewan anand it's a class if you understand it properly and after all if you rely only on term there are more chances of rejecting claims as one thing is sure cheap things just come under warranty but lic brand is guaranteed because in case of demise if your nominee doesn't get claim then your all hardwork is going to be waste so think and invest take long term and bigger sum assured for least premium You can assign your policy for taking flat or property it is a legal asset of you But term neveas I described you are creating a class asset for your beloved easily just investing 10500 per year for 35 years And too buy a term of 50 Lacs with it And rest you earn deposit in ppf Keep in mind if you will survive then only ppf will create corpus for you but in lic your family is insured to a higher extent till 1 crore with term including And its sufficient if you are earning 100000per Month no problem for investing of 10 % in New जीवन anand with rest 90 % you go with ppf, mutual funds, equity, gold, lottery, real estate any thing but keep 10 % for new jeewan anand it's a class if you understand it properly and after all if you rely only on term there are more chances of rejecting claims as one thing is sure cheap things just come under warranty but lic brand is guaranteed because in case of demise if your nominee doesn't get claim then your all hardwork is going to be waste so think and invest take long term and bigger sum assured for least premium You can assign your policy for taking flat or property it is a legal asset of you But term neveas one thing is sure cheap things just come under warranty but lic brand is guaranteed because in case of demise if your nominee doesn't get claim then your all hardwork is going to be waste so think and invest take long term and bigger sum assured for least premium You can assign your policy for taking flat or property it is a legal asset of you But term never.

This «allows [Microsoft] to better defend against and attack Google, which has emerged as its biggest problem, largely because [Google's] ad - funded model destroys the product - based...

Behind all of this is a bigger problem that goes beyond Apple and HPE: We have shifted corporate ownership form folks like you and me to large hedge funds that operate on a razor edge of legality — often drifting into insider trading)-- and drive executive compensation to favor their needs over our needs as customers or investors.