The Review considered unfunded liability, premium rate setting, rate groups, employer incentive programs (experience rating),
funding occupational disease claims and indexation of benefits.
Not exact matches
The submission points out that if employer assessments had not been decreased, there would be no «financial crisis»; supports the move to a flat rate system and one rate group, integration of
funding for
occupational diseases with the regular
funding formula, and full inflation protection for injured workers.
Papers provide detailed commentary on unfunded liability and the 6 key issues (
funding, premium rates, rate groups, employer incentives programs / experience rating,
occupational disease claims, benefit indexation — and one not included: coverage.
(6) On the recommendation of the Minister, the Lieutenant Governor in Council may make regulations prescribing matters to be considered when determining whether a proposed change to the
funding and delivery of services for the prevention of workplace injuries and
occupational diseases would be a significant change.