Sentences with phrase «funding per pupil if»

Current statute is written so that charter schools will get a $ 1,500 increase in funding per pupil if the Legislature doesn't act by June.

Not exact matches

If you drive per pupil funding towards a certain group - an extremely worthy group admittedly - but then hold cash funding per pupil at the same level overall then you are actually cutting * cash * spending per pupil for the majority.

If you attend Incline High School in the upscale town of Incline Village, for instance, you in effect «receive» more than $ 13,248 in public funds — that is, the per - pupil expenditure in that community, which is far above the state average of $ 8,274 per pupil.

If a district has «negative aid» in Wisconsin's third tier of funding, it must share some of its local revenue with districts whose per - pupil property values are lower than the state average.

In Washington State and New Mexico, districts with student enrollments between 100 and 1,200 spend $ 104 million and $ 69 million more, respectively, in total public funds than if they were spending the statewide average per pupil in these districts.

These «cyber» charters must now document their instructional minutes, and their per - pupil funding may be reduced if they offer less than the minimum number of student course minutes per year — a district - style regulation of the process of education without regard for outcomes.

Only 18 percent of the public know that charters can not hold religious services, 19 percent that they can not charge tuition, 15 percent that students must be admitted by lottery (if the school is oversubscribed), and just 12 percent that, typically, charters receive less government funding per pupil than traditional public schools.

But charter - school people across the land would forfeit their front teeth if their schools could be financed at almost $ 15,000 per pupil per year in public funds, plus the many millions in philanthropy that Moskowitz has mustered to finance start - up costs and important ancillary services.

As for the latter, states must to find ways to get charter schools to a decent level of per - pupil funding, plus facilities funding, if not in comparison to traditional public schools then at least in terms of real dollars.

If funding were the primary driver of quality, then Washington, DC's district schools, which spend almost $ 30,000 per pupil annually, should be among the nation's best instead of among the worst.

Charter schools in Connecticut can't access funds through the School Readiness Program, the primary state - funded pre-k program, but if their charter includes pre-k, they receive state per - pupil funding for preschoolers just as they do for K - 12 students.

Or a district that previously chose to concentrate Title I funds in its poorest schools could instead distribute Title I to still eligible but less poor schools, if those schools have more experienced teachers which would pull up per pupil state / local spending average in its Title I schools.

Some lawmakers continue to say that last year's General Assembly funded public education at higher levels than ever before, but if you take into account inflation and increased enrollment, per pupil funding actually dropped.

For example, if we're talking about school funding, advocating for equality would mean ensuring that all schools had the same amount of resources per pupil (an improvement in most cases, to be sure).

This almost doubles the # 10,000 to # 30,000 per pupil annual cost of a SEND pupil attending a state - funded school place, as estimated by SEND consultant Barney Angliss and Laxmi Patel, senior associate solicitor and head of education at law firm Boyes Turner, though both stress costs can be more if a pupil's needs are severe.

Since the average charter school enrolls 400 students, the average public charter school in the U.S. received $ 1,525,600 less in per - pupil funding in 2010 - 11 than it would have received if it had been a traditional public school.

At the very least, per pupil funding should be prorated and sent to the receiving district (or school) if a student transfers mid-year.

Per pupil funding in public schools dropped nationwide in 2011, but if New York is any indicator, it has since rebounded.

It is true that if you compare our schools to other countries... according to the latest OECD data, per pupil, our schools get more government funding than countries such as Germany.

If elected California governor, both the attorney general and the former eBay executive want to expand charter schools, consolidate categorical programs and simplify the per - pupil funding system into block grants that provide extra support for disadvantaged children.

If you are producing your own estimates of per pupil funding, you can use local knowledge to allow for the likelihood of this happening.

SB 302, passed in the 2015 Nevada Legislature, offers parents about $ 5,100 in per - pupil state funds to spend on private school tuition, home - school expenses and other educational services if they pull their children out of a public school.

For example, if per pupil funding is frozen in cash terms, as it is now, and the minimum funding guarantee of -1.5 per cent remains in place, almost all schools will reach their formula level of funding by 2029 - 30.

At present the maximum loss is -1.5 % per pupil per year, but it could get worse if government wants to speed up the movement of funds to schools that need more funding.

However, the NUT's analysis shows that if the current plan is fully implemented, many rural areas hoping for a funding boost will end up with the smallest per - pupil funding settlements.

However, we must acknowledge that a few steps must be taken before this possible solution would even be able to occur, and that even if per - pupil funding were to occur, it would not guarantee all students an equal quality education, due to the many factors that constitute school quality.