Sentences with phrase «funds in motor vehicle accident»

Today I want to write about advances on settlement funds in motor vehicle accident cases.

Not exact matches

The pedestrian or cyclist could also claim benefits through the insurer of the driver involved in their accident.8 If the driver did not have insurance, then the pedestrian or cyclist would be able to claim through the Motor Vehicle Accident Claims Fund as a last resort.9

If you were injured in an accident caused by an unidentified motor vehicle on a B.C. public highway, you must notofy ICBC and the police immediately and have 6 months to file a claim with ICBC's hit and run fund.

• Insurance of the driver of the vehicle involved in the accident • Their own car insurance or the car insurance of their spouse or person on whom they are dependent • Motor Vehicle Accident Claivehicle involved in the accident • Their own car insurance or the car insurance of their spouse or person on whom they are dependent • Motor Vehicle Accident ClaiVehicle Accident Claims Fund

If you were injured in an accident caused by an unidentified motor vehicle on a B.C. public highway, you have 6 months to file a claim for benefits with ICBC's Hit & Run fund.

In these scenarios, car accident lawyers and their clients must turn to the Government of Ontario's Motor Vehicle Accident Claims Fund (MVACF), which the Financial Services Commission of Ontario (FSCO) describes as the «payer of last resort» because it «provides compensation to people injured in automobile accidents when no automobile insurance exists to respond to the claim.&raquIn these scenarios, car accident lawyers and their clients must turn to the Government of Ontario's Motor Vehicle Accident Claims Fund (MVACF), which the Financial Services Commission of Ontario (FSCO) describes as the «payer of last resort» because it «provides compensation to people injured in automobile accidents when no automobile insurance exists to respond to the claim.&raquin automobile accidents when no automobile insurance exists to respond to the claim.»

(2) If an insurer in respect of which a winding - up order has been made under the Winding - up and Restructuring Act (Canada) is liable to pay statutory accident benefits, the benefits, including any benefits that were outstanding at the time the order was made, shall be paid out of the Motor Vehicle Accident Claims Fund.

-- On August 14, 1993, Ms. Janousek, a pedestrian, was struck by an uninsured vehicle driven by Shawn Montreul — After hitting Ms. Janousek, the vehicle also struck a nearby parking lot fence — The debris from the fence damaged three unoccupied vehicles in the parking lot — These vehicles were insured by Halifax Insurance Company, Canadian Surety Company and Mutual Insurance Company — None of the three vehicles came into contact with Ms. Janousek or the uninsured vehicle — As Ms. Janousek had no automobile insurance of her own to access for payment of accident benefits she submitted a claim for benefits with the Motor Vehicle Accident Claims Fund (MVACF)-- Originally the MVACF accepted the claim but on March 24, 1994 the payments ceased as the Fund believed that one of the three insurance companies should be responsible for the payments — All three companies received an application for accident benefits for Ms. Janousek but denied the claim — The insurance companies were not able to come to an agreement and resolve disputes through mediation — Ms. Janousek then applied for arbitration under the Insurance Act, R.S.O. 1990, cvehicle driven by Shawn Montreul — After hitting Ms. Janousek, the vehicle also struck a nearby parking lot fence — The debris from the fence damaged three unoccupied vehicles in the parking lot — These vehicles were insured by Halifax Insurance Company, Canadian Surety Company and Mutual Insurance Company — None of the three vehicles came into contact with Ms. Janousek or the uninsured vehicle — As Ms. Janousek had no automobile insurance of her own to access for payment of accident benefits she submitted a claim for benefits with the Motor Vehicle Accident Claims Fund (MVACF)-- Originally the MVACF accepted the claim but on March 24, 1994 the payments ceased as the Fund believed that one of the three insurance companies should be responsible for the payments — All three companies received an application for accident benefits for Ms. Janousek but denied the claim — The insurance companies were not able to come to an agreement and resolve disputes through mediation — Ms. Janousek then applied for arbitration under the Insurance Act, R.S.O. 1990, cvehicle also struck a nearby parking lot fence — The debris from the fence damaged three unoccupied vehicles in the parking lot — These vehicles were insured by Halifax Insurance Company, Canadian Surety Company and Mutual Insurance Company — None of the three vehicles came into contact with Ms. Janousek or the uninsured vehicle — As Ms. Janousek had no automobile insurance of her own to access for payment of accident benefits she submitted a claim for benefits with the Motor Vehicle Accident Claims Fund (MVACF)-- Originally the MVACF accepted the claim but on March 24, 1994 the payments ceased as the Fund believed that one of the three insurance companies should be responsible for the payments — All three companies received an application for accident benefits for Ms. Janousek but denied the claim — The insurance companies were not able to come to an agreement and resolve disputes through mediation — Ms. Janousek then applied for arbitration under the Insurance Act, R.S.O. 1990, cvehicle — As Ms. Janousek had no automobile insurance of her own to access for payment of accident benefits she submitted a claim for benefits with the Motor Vehicle Accident Claims Fund (MVACF)-- Originally the MVACF accepted the claim but on March 24, 1994 the payments ceased as the Fund believed that one of the three insurance companies should be responsible for the payments — All three companies received an application for accident benefits for Ms. Janousek but denied the claim — The insurance companies were not able to come to an agreement and resolve disputes through mediation — Ms. Janousek then applied for arbitration under the Insurance Act, R.S.O. 1990, cVehicle Accident Claims Fund (MVACF)-- Originally the MVACF accepted the claim but on March 24, 1994 the payments ceased as the Fund believed that one of the three insurance companies should be responsible for the payments — All three companies received an application for accident benefits for Ms. Janousek but denied the claim — The insurance companies were not able to come to an agreement and resolve disputes through mediation — Ms. Janousek then applied for arbitration under the Insurance Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. I. 8.

In Ontario, you can look to your own insurance company or if you do not have insurance, we can pursue the Motor Vehicle Accident Claims Fund for accident benefits.