The furlough budget extender bill was approved in the Senate along party lines (32 - 29); it passed the Assembly 82 - 56.
Not exact matches
simply ammend Dave's
budget extender bill and remove the
furloughs??? I understand that this may not be legal, but neither are the
furloughs.
Last week, Paterson sent a
bill separate from
budget extender to the Legislature that would have provided him with power to
furlough state workers.
My colleague, Michael Johnson, upon hearing that the Legislature is considering the possibility of amending Gov. David Paterson's
budget extender bill to divest it of the
furlough language, posed the question: Is that even legal?
US District Court Judge Lawrence Kahn has reportedly come down on the side of the public employee unions in the
furlough lawsuit, ruling that Gov. David Paterson can not insert his day - without - pay language into
budget extender bills.
The Legislature is expected to approve a
budget extender bill that includes state worker
furloughs that aren't slated to start until May 17.
Senate Democratic Conference Leader John Sampson said his 32 - member majority conference will be voting «yes» on the
budget extender bill next week — even if it includes public employee
furloughs, as Gov. David Paterson has threatened — because he is «not in the business of shutting downs state government.»
Megna said that while the governor was currently seeking approval for that plan as a separate
bill — something Paterson was not willing to do for the
furlough measure — he would not rule out including it in a future
budget extender if it's rejected.