Sentences with phrase «further argues for»

Advocates also say that the availability of technology that can call up the knowledge of the world's best thinkers with the click of a mouse, that can graph in two seconds what once took hours, and that can put scientific instrumentation in a pocket - sized computer further argues for moving away from century - old models of instruction.

I shall further argue for the correctness of my interpretation by bringing it to bear on the mutual immanence of actual occasions, the ontological principle, and the Category of the Ultimate.

We have so far argued for the existence of two Christian exegetical traditions using Dan.

[62] She further argued for measures to make it easier to negotiate settlements in equal pay cases, for improved access to justice by waiving tribunal fees for a limited period, and to close loopholes whereby outsourcing and insecure working conditions often lead to unequal pay for women.

She will further argue for accountability systems that look at the growth and performance of all students as well as subgroups of children.

Not exact matches

This is further evidence, he argues, of the need for pipelines to more safely move Canadian oil.

In its latest Annual Report, it argued that «even if inflation does not rise, keeping interest rates too low for long could raise financial stability and macroeconomic risks further down the road, as debt continues to pile up and risk - taking in financial markets gathers steam.»

The statement further argued S&P «overlooks the Greek government's pledges to achieve its fiscal targets for 2011 and to accelerate privatizations.»

Speckhard argues that Europe could, for far less money, loosen some of the terms of Greece's bailout and give the Greek people time to realize that Syrzia can't deliver on its populist promises and remain a member of the Euro currency.

He devoted a chunk of his maiden speech to challenging the notion that further regulation is needed for credit cards, arguing two - thirds of Canadians pay off their balances every month, meaning they incur no interest at all, and that credit cards account for just 5 % of total household debt.

Thompson and others, however, argue that given the amount of resources Facebook is throwing into video, it is bound to solve these problems eventually, and doing so will make the platform — as well as other strong contenders such as Snapchat, which claims 10 billion video views a day — far more competitive when it comes to bidding for traditional consumer ad spending.

Further to his own convictions, and ever the politician, Gingrich argued that higher taxes for the wealthy are a way of punishing the hard - working among us.

While the free - market economist would argue that we pay a premium for this material, which is true, the premium is far outweighed by the financial benefit.

Bank of Nova Scotia, National Bank and the Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce are also mixing things up, but so far eschewing the high - tech lip gloss, arguing its better to focus on becoming a better partner for consumers.

Of course, Vaynerchuk is far from the only expert who has argued that certain talents or mindsets are a prerequisite for success, but he's probably blunter than most in discouraging those who don't naturally excel in these areas from pursuing their startup dreams.

Meanwhile, France, Germany, and the Netherlands will hold federal elections in 2017, and some argue that the surprise victory of President - elect Donald Trump in the U.S. could signal a similar win for far - right candidates abroad, including Marine Le Pen of France and Geert Wilders in the Netherlands.

In 1999, Warren Buffett wrote an influential article for Fortune arguing that corporate profits as a share of GDP tend to go far higher after periods where they're depressed — and drop sharply after they've been hovering at historically high levels.

With several members of the ECB Committee arguing for this action in the last few months, the real surprise came from Draghi refusing to rule out a rate cut into negative territory (interest rates are currently at 0.05 %) in an attempt to further weaken the euro.

My weekly technology law column (Toronto Star version, homepage version) focuses on the lack of movement on the digital economy strategy, arguing that it has emerged as the government's «Penske File» - the source of considerable discussion and much «work» but thus far few tangible results (for non-Seinfeld watchers, the Penske file has become synonymous for a non-existent work project).

Existing Uber shareholders are insisting on a price per share that far exceeds the $ 50 billion valuation currently under discussion, with one possible seller arguing for a price of at least $ 40 per share, or around a $ 60 billion valuation.

I agree completely, and would even take it a step further and argue that illiquidity has been good for me, personally.

Further corporate tax cuts should be cancelled, the paper argues, in favor of direct government support for new investments in machinery and equipment, research, development and training.

Without a massive transfer of wealth from the state sector to the household sector it will be impossible, I would argue, for GDP growth rates of anything above 3 - 4 % — and perhaps even less — to occur without a further unsustainable increase in debt, whether that increase occurs inside or outside the formal banking system and whether or not discipline has been imposed on borrowers.

Then - NRC member Peter Lyons, a former official at the Los Alamos weapons laboratory, similarly argued at the time that expanded tracking «will further reduce the potential for aggregating sources» to a dangerous level.

As far as the market in general is concerned, this argues for unexciting long - term returns, possibly a «muddle - through» trading range for quite a number of years to come.

I would argue that any further knowledge of / about God can not happen if you remain behind the line of belief, whether you can factually prove anything empirically (that you can make God prove Himself at will) or use the vehicle of myth, legend, story or subjective and very personal experiences too extraordinary for words to fully convey.

Tiger has further argued — as Humanae Vitae did not explicitly, though other works of Catholic theology have — for a causal link between contraception and abortion, stating outright that «with effective contraception controlled by women, there are still more abortions than ever....

Since the theory says we should not support policies that worsen the economic condition of the poor for the sake of further enriching the rich, it is important for those operating by the theory to argue that the poor have not been damaged in the process.

Far from challenging this linkage between church and state or arguing for a naked public square, then, dissenters sought only the repeal of establishments and other forms of religious discrimination.

«These religious employers make far - reaching arguments against the exemption designed for them,» she argued.

Darwin argued further that the different races created by natural selection were necessarily and beneficially locked in the severest struggle for survival.

Further, I question the adequacy of thinking of any present state as only present, for the present moment is never a mere mathematical point but (as the radical empiricists and phenomenologists have argued) is rather «thick» with past and future.

Such love is, Jews would argue, immoral, a denial of the Deuteronomic assertion that we can choose the righteous path on our own: «For this commandment which I command thee this day, it is not hidden from thee, neither is it far off.»

Q.: Theologian James Sellers has countered this claim by arguing further that «needs» also include a need for community interaction, which in turn requires giving and sharing as well as getting.

Surely, for example, no Christian would take a critique of «monism» as far as Richard Rorty, who has argued that anyone who subordinates all activities to one dominant end» such as, for example, doing one's all ad maioram gloriam Dei» is simply mad.

I argued (in a paper prepared in the late»60s for a conference held by St. Joan's Alliance) that women's incorporation into hierarchical - patriarchal structures can only lead to further clericalizing of the church — not to changing it.

In «Efficient Causation with Concrescence,» ibid., pp. 172 - 75 (section II), I argue further for this notion of «virtual unity».

He is known to have been impertinent to his elders as far back as age 12, when he argued fine theological points with them in the temple, without any consideration for the feelings of his parents.

Ogden, for example, argues that by far the most important way in which we can participate in God's emancipating work of «helping people manage their opportunities for good... is to labor for fundamental social and cultural change.»

But this is not the place to pursue further these or any of the other implications of the conclusion for which I have argued.

But I would argue that this further typifies the competition between the principalities and powers for the bodies and souls of people to oppress and possess.

Further, what is now considered cannon, was argued over, for a number of centuries by the church fathers... um, you know, the Eastern Orthodox ones?

Critics have argued that exemption for nonprofits is far too narrow and a host of nonprofit religious groups have sued the administration over the regulations.

Further, the excuse for his message as presented in this article — that he preaches a watered - down version of Christianity (some would argue that his teaching does not reflect Christianity at all) to attract people to churches — is fundamentally flawed.

Any attempt to argue for accuracy of the tradition so far as the historical Jesus is concerned on the basis of Luke's use of «eyewitness» is to fail to take into account the clear fact that he, like Paul, absolutely identifies risen Lord and earthly Jesus and so regards Paul as, in effect, an «eyewitness and minister of the word».

And we shall go even further, for it is not sufficient simply to argue that there is no contradiction between revelation and critical consciousness.

To recap the argument as a whole: Having begun with mutually corroborating individual and communal appeals to experience to establish what he takes to be a fact, namely, that our twofold noetic experience of ourselves and others is valuational, Ogden then argues for a further noetic sense of an encompassing whole in addition to such a twofold sense of the worth of self and others.25 Finally, he argues in correlational fashion that such a threefold noetic experience of valuation presupposes as the condition of its possibility an ontic whole to be experienced.

He further argues that the worldwide rise of Pentecostalism fulfils a need for a faithin God that is not linked to the discredited institutions of historical Christianity (ie the mainline churches) and that likewise shares the postmodern rejection of reason.

But the latter two have concerns that far transcend their religious background, for whom that background seems more or less accidental to their philosophical positions, while the former three argue directly out of their Judaism, precisely the outlook that makes their thought so instructive for Novak's thesis:

When, like most of America, Shelby Steele thought that story was true, he argued that it revealed that Obama had scuttled a long (and promising) relationship mainly for the sake of better exploring and establishing his black identity, a goal that involved a refusal to further explore his bi-racial identity.