If reports emerge of
further election interference despite Facebook having two years to implement safeguards, it could be hit with significant public backlash and potential government regulation.
Not exact matches
Nearly a year later,
further reporting and testimony from current and former intelligence officials have painted a portrait of Russia's
election interference as a multifaceted, well - planned, and coordinated campaign aimed at undermining the backbone of American democracy: free and fair
elections.
Besides, while Facebook's role in
election interference in the 2016 US
elections is merited, the company's problems abroad are
far more disconcerting — especially where local regulations aren't as effective and can result in violence and death.
Zuckerberg also reflected on how
far his company has come: «If you told me in 2004, when I was getting started with Facebook, that a big part of my responsibility today would be to help protect the integrity of
elections against
interference by other governments, you know, I wouldn't have really believed that.»
Further, citizens should have the right to know when the technology companies make a mistake, or when breaches occur such as the Russian
election interference campaign in 2016 or the recently announced theft of Facebook user data by Cambridge Analytica.
Many people feel that the blockchain concept could eliminate voter fraud, hacking and other
interference, making
elections far more secure than they are today.
In the second congressional hearing on social media and the 2016
election last Wednesday, Facebook
further revealed the extent of Russia's
interference using Instagram.