Not exact matches
The NAMAs, however, would not constitute binding
emissions reduction requirements for developing countries in contrast to the binding obligations of developed countries in the Kyoto Protocol that would be
further developed in Copenhagen.
«Accordingly, as we concluded in D.P.U. 10 - 54, at 229 - 230, the Cape Wind facility will produce
far greater benefits in terms of its: (1) contribution to narrowing the projected gap between supply and demand of renewable resources; (2) contribution to compliance with GWSA
emission reductions requirements; (3) contribution to fuel diversity; (4) price suppression effects; (5) ability to act as a hedge against future fuel price increases and volatility; (6) contribution to system reliability; and (7) ability to moderate system peak load.
The NAMAs, however, would not constitute binding
emissions reduction requirements for developing countries in contrast to the binding obligations of developed countries in the Kyoto Protocol that would be
further developed and extended in Copenhagen.