No
further investments of time, capital or expertise required.
Once deployed,
no further investments of time or capital is required.
Grading tests represents
a further investment of time that could be spent more productively.
Not exact matches
Look for more money to be given to the Canada Revenue Agency to fight offshore tax evasion, an
investment that has so
far helped the CRA reap millions in extra tax dollars while at the same
time achieving the aim
of discouraging tax evasion by Canadians.
On the other end
of the spectrum, the
time investment generally extends much
farther than a typical «9 to 5 ″ schedule.
In the Russian
Far East, Huawei outcompeted Nokia in a 2017 open tender bidding process to lay an internet cable to the Kurile Islands by agreeing to complete the project at a cost that was 9 percent below Rostelecom's stated maximum contract price.122 Though there have been no specific complaints surrounding the Kurile Islands tender, China's
investments in Russia at
times do not adhere to market principles — an issue
of concern for the West given long - standing U.S. and European criticism
of unfair Chinese trade and
investment practices.
While in this example the difference might be a difference
of less than $ 100 over a year, your
investment time horizon is
far longer than one year.
Which highlights the attractiveness
of «value» as an
investment strategy at a
time when many equity markets have become, in our view, unsustainably expensive as a result
of monetary stimulus and the success — so
far —
of «Smart Beta» and «growth» strategies.
According to Reuters, Deutsche Bank fired 300 U.S. - based
investment bankers yesterday, and plans to significantly reduce its workforce — by the end
of this week, another 100 employees will have lost their jobs, as the Financial
Times further reported.
India's largest online marketplace Flipkart's valuation woes seem to be
far from over as two American mutual funds, Fidelity Rutland Square Trust II and Valic Co. have marked down the value
of their
investment in the company for the second
time this year.
If you are saving for something in the
far off future such as retirement, you would want to make safer
investments that grow over a longer period
of time.
The fact that these hours are frequently spent with persons whose mental health is in jeopardy gives counseling a qualitative significance for mental health which
far outweighs the quantitative
investment of pastoral
time.
One busy mid-years couple reports that the two periods they spend meditating each day gives them a tonic for tensions as well as other rewards which
far surpass their
investment of time.
Time for some brutal honesty... this team, as it stands, is in no better position to compete next season than they were 12 months ago, minus the fact that some fans have been easily snowed by the acquisition of Lacazette, the free transfer LB and the release of Sanogo... if you look at the facts carefully you will see a team that still has far more questions than answers... to better show what I mean by this statement I will briefly discuss the current state of affairs on a position - by - position basis... in goal we have 4 potential candidates, but in reality we have only 1 option with any real future and somehow he's the only one we have actively tried to get rid of for years because he and his father were a little too involved on social media and he got caught smoking (funny how people still defend Wiltshire under the same and far worse circumstances)... you would think we would want to keep any goaltender that Juventus had interest in, as they seem to have a pretty good history when it comes to that position... as far as the defenders on our current roster there are only a few individuals whom have the skill and / or youth worthy of our time and / or investment, as such we should get rid of anyone who doesn't meet those simple requirements, which means we should get rid of DeBouchy, Gibbs, Gabriel, Mertz and loan out Chambers to see if last seasons foray with Middlesborough was an anomaly or a prediction of things to come... some fans have lamented wildly about the return of Mertz to the starting lineup due to his FA Cup performance but these sort of pie in the sky meanderings are indicative of what's wrong with this club and it's wishy - washy fan - base... in addition to these moves the club should aggressively pursue the acquisition of dominant and mobile CB to stabilize an all too fragile defensive group that has self - destructed on numerous occasions over the past 5 seasons... moving forward and building on our need to re-establish our once dominant presence throughout the middle of the park we need to target a CDM then do whatever it takes to get that player into the fold without any of the usual nickel and diming we have become famous for (this kind of ruthless haggling has cost us numerous special players and certainly can't help make the player in question feel good about the way their future potential employer feels about them)... in order for us to become dominant again we need to be strong up the middle again from Goalkeeper to CB to DM to ACM to striker, like we did in our most glorious years before and during Wenger's reign... with this in mind, if we want Ozil to be that dominant attacking midfielder we can't keep leaving him exposed to constant ridicule about his lack of defensive prowess and provide him with the proper players in the final third... he was never a good defensive player in Real or with the German National squad and they certainly didn't suffer as a result of his presence on the pitch... as for the rest of the midfield the blame falls squarely in the hands of Wenger and Gazidis, the fact that Ramsey, Ox, Sanchez and even Ozil were allowed to regularly start when none of the aforementioned had more than a year left under contract is criminal for a club of this size and financial might... the fact that we could find money for Walcott and Xhaka, who weren't even guaranteed starters, means that our whole business model needs a complete overhaul... for me it's time to get rid of some serious deadweight, even if it means selling them below what you believe their market value is just to simply right this ship and change the stagnant culture that currently exists... this means saying goodbye to Wiltshire, Elneny, Carzola, Walcott and Ramsey... everyone, minus Elneny, have spent just as much time on the training table as on the field of play, which would be manageable if they weren't so inconsistent from a performance standpoint (excluding Carzola, who is like the recent version of Rosicky — too bad, both will be deeply missed)... in their places we need to bring in some proven performers with no history of injuries... up front, although I do like the possibilities that a player like Lacazette presents, the fact that we had to wait so many years to acquire some true quality at the striker position falls once again squarely at the feet of Wenger... this issue highlights the ultimate scam being perpetrated by this club since the arrival of Kroenke: pretend your a small market club when it comes to making purchases but milk your fans like a big market club when it comes to ticket prices and merchandising... I believe the reason why Wenger hasn't pursued someone of Henry's quality, minus a fairly inexpensive RVP, was that he knew that they would demand players of a similar ilk to be brought on board and that wasn't possible when the business model was that of a «selling» club... does it really make sense that we could only make a cheeky bid for Suarez, or that we couldn't get Higuain over the line when he was being offered up for half the price he eventually went to Juve for, or that we've only paid any interest to strikers who were clearly not going to press their current teams to let them go to Arsenal like Benzema or Cavani... just part of the facade that finally came crashing down when Sanchez finally called their bluff... the fact remains that no one wants to win more than Sanchez, including Wenger, and although I don't agree with everything that he has done off the field, I would much rather have Alexis front and center than a manager who has clearly bought into the Kroenke model in large part due to the fact that his enormous ego suggests that only he could accomplish great things without breaking the bank... unfortunately that isn't possible anymore as the game has changed quite dramatically in the last 15 years, which has left a largely complacent and complicit Wenger on the outside looking in... so don't blame those players who demanded more and were left wanting... don't blame those fans who have tried desperately to raise awareness for several years when cracks began to appear... place the blame at the feet of those who were well aware all along of the potential pitfalls of just such a plan but continued to follow it even when it was no longer a financial necessity, like it ever really wa
Time for some brutal honesty... this team, as it stands, is in no better position to compete next season than they were 12 months ago, minus the fact that some fans have been easily snowed by the acquisition
of Lacazette, the free transfer LB and the release
of Sanogo... if you look at the facts carefully you will see a team that still has
far more questions than answers... to better show what I mean by this statement I will briefly discuss the current state
of affairs on a position - by - position basis... in goal we have 4 potential candidates, but in reality we have only 1 option with any real future and somehow he's the only one we have actively tried to get rid
of for years because he and his father were a little too involved on social media and he got caught smoking (funny how people still defend Wiltshire under the same and
far worse circumstances)... you would think we would want to keep any goaltender that Juventus had interest in, as they seem to have a pretty good history when it comes to that position... as
far as the defenders on our current roster there are only a few individuals whom have the skill and / or youth worthy
of our
time and / or investment, as such we should get rid of anyone who doesn't meet those simple requirements, which means we should get rid of DeBouchy, Gibbs, Gabriel, Mertz and loan out Chambers to see if last seasons foray with Middlesborough was an anomaly or a prediction of things to come... some fans have lamented wildly about the return of Mertz to the starting lineup due to his FA Cup performance but these sort of pie in the sky meanderings are indicative of what's wrong with this club and it's wishy - washy fan - base... in addition to these moves the club should aggressively pursue the acquisition of dominant and mobile CB to stabilize an all too fragile defensive group that has self - destructed on numerous occasions over the past 5 seasons... moving forward and building on our need to re-establish our once dominant presence throughout the middle of the park we need to target a CDM then do whatever it takes to get that player into the fold without any of the usual nickel and diming we have become famous for (this kind of ruthless haggling has cost us numerous special players and certainly can't help make the player in question feel good about the way their future potential employer feels about them)... in order for us to become dominant again we need to be strong up the middle again from Goalkeeper to CB to DM to ACM to striker, like we did in our most glorious years before and during Wenger's reign... with this in mind, if we want Ozil to be that dominant attacking midfielder we can't keep leaving him exposed to constant ridicule about his lack of defensive prowess and provide him with the proper players in the final third... he was never a good defensive player in Real or with the German National squad and they certainly didn't suffer as a result of his presence on the pitch... as for the rest of the midfield the blame falls squarely in the hands of Wenger and Gazidis, the fact that Ramsey, Ox, Sanchez and even Ozil were allowed to regularly start when none of the aforementioned had more than a year left under contract is criminal for a club of this size and financial might... the fact that we could find money for Walcott and Xhaka, who weren't even guaranteed starters, means that our whole business model needs a complete overhaul... for me it's time to get rid of some serious deadweight, even if it means selling them below what you believe their market value is just to simply right this ship and change the stagnant culture that currently exists... this means saying goodbye to Wiltshire, Elneny, Carzola, Walcott and Ramsey... everyone, minus Elneny, have spent just as much time on the training table as on the field of play, which would be manageable if they weren't so inconsistent from a performance standpoint (excluding Carzola, who is like the recent version of Rosicky — too bad, both will be deeply missed)... in their places we need to bring in some proven performers with no history of injuries... up front, although I do like the possibilities that a player like Lacazette presents, the fact that we had to wait so many years to acquire some true quality at the striker position falls once again squarely at the feet of Wenger... this issue highlights the ultimate scam being perpetrated by this club since the arrival of Kroenke: pretend your a small market club when it comes to making purchases but milk your fans like a big market club when it comes to ticket prices and merchandising... I believe the reason why Wenger hasn't pursued someone of Henry's quality, minus a fairly inexpensive RVP, was that he knew that they would demand players of a similar ilk to be brought on board and that wasn't possible when the business model was that of a «selling» club... does it really make sense that we could only make a cheeky bid for Suarez, or that we couldn't get Higuain over the line when he was being offered up for half the price he eventually went to Juve for, or that we've only paid any interest to strikers who were clearly not going to press their current teams to let them go to Arsenal like Benzema or Cavani... just part of the facade that finally came crashing down when Sanchez finally called their bluff... the fact remains that no one wants to win more than Sanchez, including Wenger, and although I don't agree with everything that he has done off the field, I would much rather have Alexis front and center than a manager who has clearly bought into the Kroenke model in large part due to the fact that his enormous ego suggests that only he could accomplish great things without breaking the bank... unfortunately that isn't possible anymore as the game has changed quite dramatically in the last 15 years, which has left a largely complacent and complicit Wenger on the outside looking in... so don't blame those players who demanded more and were left wanting... don't blame those fans who have tried desperately to raise awareness for several years when cracks began to appear... place the blame at the feet of those who were well aware all along of the potential pitfalls of just such a plan but continued to follow it even when it was no longer a financial necessity, like it ever really wa
time and / or
investment, as such we should get rid
of anyone who doesn't meet those simple requirements, which means we should get rid
of DeBouchy, Gibbs, Gabriel, Mertz and loan out Chambers to see if last seasons foray with Middlesborough was an anomaly or a prediction
of things to come... some fans have lamented wildly about the return
of Mertz to the starting lineup due to his FA Cup performance but these sort
of pie in the sky meanderings are indicative
of what's wrong with this club and it's wishy - washy fan - base... in addition to these moves the club should aggressively pursue the acquisition
of dominant and mobile CB to stabilize an all too fragile defensive group that has self - destructed on numerous occasions over the past 5 seasons... moving forward and building on our need to re-establish our once dominant presence throughout the middle
of the park we need to target a CDM then do whatever it takes to get that player into the fold without any
of the usual nickel and diming we have become famous for (this kind
of ruthless haggling has cost us numerous special players and certainly can't help make the player in question feel good about the way their future potential employer feels about them)... in order for us to become dominant again we need to be strong up the middle again from Goalkeeper to CB to DM to ACM to striker, like we did in our most glorious years before and during Wenger's reign... with this in mind, if we want Ozil to be that dominant attacking midfielder we can't keep leaving him exposed to constant ridicule about his lack
of defensive prowess and provide him with the proper players in the final third... he was never a good defensive player in Real or with the German National squad and they certainly didn't suffer as a result
of his presence on the pitch... as for the rest
of the midfield the blame falls squarely in the hands
of Wenger and Gazidis, the fact that Ramsey, Ox, Sanchez and even Ozil were allowed to regularly start when none
of the aforementioned had more than a year left under contract is criminal for a club
of this size and financial might... the fact that we could find money for Walcott and Xhaka, who weren't even guaranteed starters, means that our whole business model needs a complete overhaul... for me it's
time to get rid of some serious deadweight, even if it means selling them below what you believe their market value is just to simply right this ship and change the stagnant culture that currently exists... this means saying goodbye to Wiltshire, Elneny, Carzola, Walcott and Ramsey... everyone, minus Elneny, have spent just as much time on the training table as on the field of play, which would be manageable if they weren't so inconsistent from a performance standpoint (excluding Carzola, who is like the recent version of Rosicky — too bad, both will be deeply missed)... in their places we need to bring in some proven performers with no history of injuries... up front, although I do like the possibilities that a player like Lacazette presents, the fact that we had to wait so many years to acquire some true quality at the striker position falls once again squarely at the feet of Wenger... this issue highlights the ultimate scam being perpetrated by this club since the arrival of Kroenke: pretend your a small market club when it comes to making purchases but milk your fans like a big market club when it comes to ticket prices and merchandising... I believe the reason why Wenger hasn't pursued someone of Henry's quality, minus a fairly inexpensive RVP, was that he knew that they would demand players of a similar ilk to be brought on board and that wasn't possible when the business model was that of a «selling» club... does it really make sense that we could only make a cheeky bid for Suarez, or that we couldn't get Higuain over the line when he was being offered up for half the price he eventually went to Juve for, or that we've only paid any interest to strikers who were clearly not going to press their current teams to let them go to Arsenal like Benzema or Cavani... just part of the facade that finally came crashing down when Sanchez finally called their bluff... the fact remains that no one wants to win more than Sanchez, including Wenger, and although I don't agree with everything that he has done off the field, I would much rather have Alexis front and center than a manager who has clearly bought into the Kroenke model in large part due to the fact that his enormous ego suggests that only he could accomplish great things without breaking the bank... unfortunately that isn't possible anymore as the game has changed quite dramatically in the last 15 years, which has left a largely complacent and complicit Wenger on the outside looking in... so don't blame those players who demanded more and were left wanting... don't blame those fans who have tried desperately to raise awareness for several years when cracks began to appear... place the blame at the feet of those who were well aware all along of the potential pitfalls of just such a plan but continued to follow it even when it was no longer a financial necessity, like it ever really wa
time to get rid
of some serious deadweight, even if it means selling them below what you believe their market value is just to simply right this ship and change the stagnant culture that currently exists... this means saying goodbye to Wiltshire, Elneny, Carzola, Walcott and Ramsey... everyone, minus Elneny, have spent just as much
time on the training table as on the field of play, which would be manageable if they weren't so inconsistent from a performance standpoint (excluding Carzola, who is like the recent version of Rosicky — too bad, both will be deeply missed)... in their places we need to bring in some proven performers with no history of injuries... up front, although I do like the possibilities that a player like Lacazette presents, the fact that we had to wait so many years to acquire some true quality at the striker position falls once again squarely at the feet of Wenger... this issue highlights the ultimate scam being perpetrated by this club since the arrival of Kroenke: pretend your a small market club when it comes to making purchases but milk your fans like a big market club when it comes to ticket prices and merchandising... I believe the reason why Wenger hasn't pursued someone of Henry's quality, minus a fairly inexpensive RVP, was that he knew that they would demand players of a similar ilk to be brought on board and that wasn't possible when the business model was that of a «selling» club... does it really make sense that we could only make a cheeky bid for Suarez, or that we couldn't get Higuain over the line when he was being offered up for half the price he eventually went to Juve for, or that we've only paid any interest to strikers who were clearly not going to press their current teams to let them go to Arsenal like Benzema or Cavani... just part of the facade that finally came crashing down when Sanchez finally called their bluff... the fact remains that no one wants to win more than Sanchez, including Wenger, and although I don't agree with everything that he has done off the field, I would much rather have Alexis front and center than a manager who has clearly bought into the Kroenke model in large part due to the fact that his enormous ego suggests that only he could accomplish great things without breaking the bank... unfortunately that isn't possible anymore as the game has changed quite dramatically in the last 15 years, which has left a largely complacent and complicit Wenger on the outside looking in... so don't blame those players who demanded more and were left wanting... don't blame those fans who have tried desperately to raise awareness for several years when cracks began to appear... place the blame at the feet of those who were well aware all along of the potential pitfalls of just such a plan but continued to follow it even when it was no longer a financial necessity, like it ever really wa
time on the training table as on the field
of play, which would be manageable if they weren't so inconsistent from a performance standpoint (excluding Carzola, who is like the recent version
of Rosicky — too bad, both will be deeply missed)... in their places we need to bring in some proven performers with no history
of injuries... up front, although I do like the possibilities that a player like Lacazette presents, the fact that we had to wait so many years to acquire some true quality at the striker position falls once again squarely at the feet
of Wenger... this issue highlights the ultimate scam being perpetrated by this club since the arrival
of Kroenke: pretend your a small market club when it comes to making purchases but milk your fans like a big market club when it comes to ticket prices and merchandising... I believe the reason why Wenger hasn't pursued someone
of Henry's quality, minus a fairly inexpensive RVP, was that he knew that they would demand players
of a similar ilk to be brought on board and that wasn't possible when the business model was that
of a «selling» club... does it really make sense that we could only make a cheeky bid for Suarez, or that we couldn't get Higuain over the line when he was being offered up for half the price he eventually went to Juve for, or that we've only paid any interest to strikers who were clearly not going to press their current teams to let them go to Arsenal like Benzema or Cavani... just part
of the facade that finally came crashing down when Sanchez finally called their bluff... the fact remains that no one wants to win more than Sanchez, including Wenger, and although I don't agree with everything that he has done off the field, I would much rather have Alexis front and center than a manager who has clearly bought into the Kroenke model in large part due to the fact that his enormous ego suggests that only he could accomplish great things without breaking the bank... unfortunately that isn't possible anymore as the game has changed quite dramatically in the last 15 years, which has left a largely complacent and complicit Wenger on the outside looking in... so don't blame those players who demanded more and were left wanting... don't blame those fans who have tried desperately to raise awareness for several years when cracks began to appear... place the blame at the feet
of those who were well aware all along
of the potential pitfalls
of just such a plan but continued to follow it even when it was no longer a financial necessity, like it ever really was...
Regnerus (the same sociologist behind a controversial study
of how children
of same - sex couples fare) says cheap sex — sex with little cost as
far as
time or emotional
investment — is behind a host
of societal ills, from fewer people marrying to the rise
of unmarriageable men to more people living together to more children being born outside
of marriage — you get the idea.
Too much
time has already been wasted and we need to see positive action now from both governments as well as
further action to attract new
investment to Port Talbot such as the creation
of an urban development company.»
A growth policy, which is desperately needed, could be generated without any increase in public borrowing, by switching Mervyn King's
further # 25bn tranche
of QE from the banks to industrial
investment, by taxing the ultra-rich on the # 155bn gains they've made (according to the Sunday
Times) over the last 3 years, and / or by instructing the nationalised banks RBS and Lloyds to prioritise their lending on jobs in house - building and infrastructure.
Dialogue and deliberation usually require a fairly high
investment of time, but may yield tangible and
far - reaching results through sound, science - based decision - making.
Instead
of levying
further cuts, they add, it's
time to make the sort
of investments — in research, education, and infrastructure — that will produce long - term economic growth.
Best
investment of my
time and money that I have made so
far in continuing education.
So, without
further ado, if you're one
of those who want to enjoy a luxury handbag, but at the same
time make sure that it's worth your
investment and would retain its value &
of course without even trying make heads turn, following are the 5 bags that you should consider investing in.
Look no
further than the classic «Drop Waist Dress» if you're pining for an
investment that'll stand the test
of time.
Erman's efforts are a bit too ambitious for their own good at
times, as well as flawed by their own right, but on the whole, Erman delivers, providing enough entertainment value and dramatic strength to earn your
investment, which is
further secured by the onscreen carriers
of this saga.
But because
of the great
investment of time and effort required for stop - motion, films using the technique are few and
far between these days.
Further, free technical support and free upgrades that are a part
of most good Learning Management Systems ensure that the learning / training happens smoothly with little or no
time and effort
investment towards the Learning Management System's maintenance.
Now is the
time to accelerate our progress by
further lifting
of the charter cap, where sufficient demand and proven providers exist, while at the same
time making the financial
investment in growing and deepening the innovation school movement.
While creating truly effective eLearning scenarios may require a greater
investment of both
time and resources, it can often make your eLearning course
far more entertaining and informative for your learners.
Now is the
time to accelerate our progress by
further lifting
of the charter cap, where sufficient demand and proven providers exist, while at the same
time making the financial
investment in growing and deepening the innovation school movement,» writes Professor Paul Reville.
The first thing is to remember that any
investment of time you make to create a kinder, more accepting culture in your school will yield rewards
far greater than just having students treat one another better.
(cont'd)- I'm giving away hundreds
of listings on the Vault, and as a result
of doing so, won't see one thin dime
of income on the site until October or later - Given all the
time and money I've already sunk into developing the site, I don't even expect to earn back my upfront
investment until sometime next year - I'm already personally reaching out to publishers on behalf
of authors who are listed in the Vault, on my own
time and my own long distance bill, despite the fact that I don't stand to earn so much as a finder's fee if any
of those contacts result in an offer - I make my The IndieAuthor Guide available for free on my author site and blog - I built Publetariat, a free resource for self - pubbing authors and small imprints, by myself, and paid for its registration, software and hosting out
of my own pocket - I shoulder all the ongoing expense and the lion's share
of administration for the Publetariat site, which since its launch on 2/11
of this year, has only earned $ 36 in ad revenue; the site never has, and likely never will, earn its keep in ad revenue, but I keep it going because I know it's a valuable resource for authors and publishers - I've given away
far more copies
of my novels than I've sold, because I'm a pushover for anyone who emails me to say s / he can't afford to buy them - I paid my own travel expenses to speak at this year's O'Reilly Tools
of Change conference, nearly $ 1000, just to be part
of the Rise
of Ebooks panel and raise awareness about self - published authors who are strategically leveraging ebooks - I judge in self - published book competitions, and I read the * entire * book in every case, despite the fact that the honorarium has never been more than $ 12 per book — a figure that works out to less than $.50 per hour
of my
time spent reading and commenting In spite
of all this, you still come here and elsewhere to insinuate I'm greedy and only out to take advantage
of my fellow authors.
By
far it's my
investment of time not money that would drive my own star rating skew.
The performance
of inventory — how many
times it «turns» in a year and how successfully the store manages to buy what it needs without wasting
investment (tying up cash) and incurring margin - destroying revenueless - costs (return freight, probably added to inbound freight, plus wasted labor shelving, removing, packing, and shipping)-- is, by
far, the single biggest determinant
of whether a store succeeds commercially or fails.
Seems like the answer is the same as in any situation where one receives
far less value than was promised in exchange for an
investment of time and money — vote with your feet.
All because no - one ever told them that writing and publishing a book costs little - to - nothing, that it's possible to write a staggering amount in an hour per week and that, with modern technology such as speech to text apps, the
time investment can be cut down even
further allowing you to get down the first draft
of your book while on - the - go.
So a long
time ago in a galaxy
far,
far away, I began a series called «The Pros And Cons
Of Different Types
Of Investments».
But it is likely more than coincidence that every five years marks one market cycle and that DALBAR research on stock ownership patterns show people maintain stock
investments for an average
of 3.27 years — just a smidgeon longer than the
time needed to develop ideas
of a new regime and
far short
of a full market cycle.
Over
time, a broadly diversified index
of US
investment - grade bonds has produced positive returns (after accounting for inflation)
far more frequently than cash (see the chart below).
If you take the
time to protect yourself, refuse to try to predict the future, track spending, make sure your withdrawals are appropriate and understand your
investment time horizon, you'll be
far ahead
of the game.
The benefit from tax - arbitrage just between the bottom rate
of 20 % and a middling ~ 30 % is a one -
time gain
of ~ 10 %, which is going to
far exceed one or two years
of tax on
investment growth (assuming you don't actually need the money to pay for your expenses while out
of the workforce).
Paul — considering TLI's history, the
far richer data the company has to work with (than I have here), and the
time / money spent on medical assessments, I agree we should now have a high level
of confidence in the board /
investment manager's LE assessment.
With the general market currently experiencing a mild correction and REIT valuations suffering
further from fear
of rising interest rates, why would I be considering an
investment in Sabra at this
time?
2 —
Further, you mentioned an
investment process to chalk out on your MF Portfolio, but there is no any guidance to how to allocate the resources for the goals
of different
time - frames.
I don't have a lot
of time to manage my
investments, and this was the simplest strategy I've come up with so
far.
Of these two, long - term performance's neck - and - neck, but I think the JPMorgan fund's got the edge as a UK investment trust's far less of a tax / administrative headache (vs. a US closed - end fund), and it's got almost 4 times the asset
Of these two, long - term performance's neck - and - neck, but I think the JPMorgan fund's got the edge as a UK
investment trust's
far less
of a tax / administrative headache (vs. a US closed - end fund), and it's got almost 4 times the asset
of a tax / administrative headache (vs. a US closed - end fund), and it's got almost 4
times the assets.
I think where home bias is a factor is where one looks at
investments close to home and does not consider what alternatives
further away may exist (and yep, I am certainly guilty
of that at
times).
Look for more money to be given to the Canada Revenue Agency to fight offshore tax evasion, an
investment that has so
far helped the CRA reap millions in extra tax dollars while at the same
time achieving the aim
of discouraging tax evasion by Canadians.
In addition, [Mr. Scott] may from
time to
time, depending on prevailing market, economic and other conditions, acquire additional shares
of the Common Stock
of [ASYS] or engage in discussions with [ASYS] concerning
further acquisitions
of shares
of the Common Stock
of [ASYS] or
further investments in [ASYS].
As banks move
further into the realm
of investments, mortgages, and financial planning now is not
time to let your financial literacy lag.
We know about an investing strategy that beats Buy - and - Hold in 102 out
of 110
time - periods, an investing strategy that permits us to obtain
far higher returns at dramatically less risk, an investing strategy that permits us all to retire years sooner and that would bring us out
of this economic crisis if we could share it with millions
of middle - class investors (if people could switch to an
investment strategy that would put their retirement plans back on track, they would feel free to start spending again and businesses could start hiring again), and our first reaction is to come up with convoluted arguments as to why the best thing to do is to AVOID learning more about it and to AVOID getting the word out to the millions
of middle - class people whose lives we have destroyed with our promotion
of Buy - and - Hold.
The
farther an investor gets into retirement then the more their
investment time horizon will shorten and they should lower the risk
of their portfolio.