Sentences with phrase «further point i would make»

Not exact matches

But since profits begin to trail off as the price gets further away from $ 55 in either direction, Gordon wants to make sure he has a point at which to get out of the trade.

NFC is still relatively new on iPhones and it's possible that Apple may in fact open up the capability to outsiders at some point, but so far, the company has made no overtures to that effect.

But they also point out it could inflict further headaches on Employment Minister Jason Kenney if the set salary level is higher than the minimum wage, meaning temporary foreign workers would stand to make better money than Canadians.

Which is a fine point (and one several other tech experts have also made), but if that's as far as it goes, then Marie Kondo might still be onto something here in the real world.

Musk tried to further clarify a point that he made on Tesla's second quarter earnings call, when he insisted that Tesla doesn't have a demand problem.

While we haven't yet got to the point where Canadian oil production is literally stranded — shut down for lack of a place to store, let alone ship it — our product is selling for far less than the North American and world benchmark prices that continue to make filling up your car an expensive proposition.

So if we can expect 3 more quarter - point hikes this year it would seem to make sense to stick to short - term CDs yielding around 2 % now and then look for a longer - term one at around 3.5 % at EOY, especially if one — I am in this camp — thinks that by EOY the odds of recession will have risen enough that further rate hikes in 2019 will be looking doubtful.

As was widely noticed, we also refrained from making the point we have been making for the past year or so about it «being unlikely that there would be no further rises in the course of the expansion».

«In light of growing trends, and following the decisions made today, the government of Canada has determined that foreign state control of oil sands development has reached the point at which further such foreign state control would not be of net benefit to Canada,» Harper said.

Whatever your credit limit is, any time you use up all your available credit to the point that you can't make further purchases, this situation can be described as having your credit card maxed out.

I made a CD of all the rough demos and rough mixes and stuff that we had so far, which we had versions of every song on the record at that point, and Tim came back, and he just said «man I like everything but I just don't think that «Backwoods Nation» fits.

And Ben, bless your heart, this is the most succinct and cogent statement you've made so far on what is indeed an important point.

Thats another thing that Urks the hell out of me... Why do they make it a point to go to the farthest places in the world when we have people starving in our own country?

fred, They were atheists as far as your god is concerned, but I think the point was why couldn't an omniscient and omnipotent god have made itself known on all continents before the European invasion of the New Worlds?

sorry; i must have hit the wrong reply button — this SHOULD have been tagged as a reply to a thread further down the page where i pointed out that the «Pastor» Knapp had shaved and was wearing a shirt made of a blended fabric — both also prohibited in Leviticus.

the point is far from made... this is an thinking exercise that so far all have failed....

All the comments / points I have made so far have gone unanswered or conveniently skipped (for lack of logical response).

Critics point out further that the new reformers must make a division in principle between the sexual and marital goods of unity and procreation and thereby make licit forms of «baby making» that have, in principle, no connection with «lovemaking.»

You make a good point — but I think there's a balance that is hard to maintain for a leader between having good relationships / reputation with people, but not having people's attachment and admiration go too far...

No one will ever see it, just like no one ever saw three of the four vile posts you made earlier, and you will simply have further proved my point regarding the vanity of the atheist worldview.

Thus far I have discussed the need for speculation in natural theology with regard to particular doctrines; but the point can be made more globally.

Gay «No» campaigners Keith Mills and Paddy Manning pointed out that such was perfectly possible without undermining family structures completely since extensive Civil Partnership legislation was already in place, and they did make a difference, but the softening up of the electorate by years of sob - stories would have taken far more time and effort to overcome.

Suppose further that they made a point of stopping to pray at the massive wall which surrounds the Vatican and which they asserted was a sorrowful reminder of the way that Pius XII and the Catholic Church had walled themselves off from the pleas of innocent Jewish children in the Holocaust.

As far as attending the marriage ceremony of gay people i have two points of view the first is that that is there choice to live how they want to but to me that is clearly not Gods best and sin is sin and needs to be repented of but that is my standard not theres.As far as divorced people remarrying why shouldnt they if they have repented of there past God forgives them not condemns them.As he said to the women caught in adultery do they condemn you and she answers no and he says and neither do i.Go and sin no more.This was not just for the women causght in adultery this lesson was for every one of us he was addressing our sin publically for all have sinned and fall short of the Glory of God that being his son Jesus Christ he is telling us that we must make the same decision to go and sin no more to repent in our hearts and the only way to do that is to give our hearts and lives totally to Jesus Christ other wise we are no better than the hypocrites in JESUS day.brentnz

The Relevance of Cosmic Unity In the lead letter of the same issue of Philosophy Now the prominent anti-reductionist philosopher of ethics and of science Mary Midgely makes a point often made by Edward Holloway (though he might not have used the word «choice»), namely that «simple logic surely shows that natural selection can not be the universal explanation because «selection» only makes sense a clearly specified range of choices — an idea to which far too little attention has been given.»

Less persuasive, to me at least, is the claim that this probably continued until 1931, the year in which Lewis converted to Christianity (and would now think a relation with a married woman to be wrong) Wilson's way of making this point is, however, an instance of a very undesirable trait in his writing: the tendency to assert indirectly and to be glib while seeming to eschew it: «It would be far too glib to suggest that he consciously made the second change, to adopt Christianity, merely to give himself an excuse to abandon sexual relations with Mrs. Moore, whatever the nature of those relations had been.»

Although I agree with the basic premise of this argument, I would be remiss if I did not point out that the inroads science has made into those realms previously occupied by religion is far greater than just storm prediction.

We can summarize the discussion up to this point by saying that the literary form of Mark's tomb pericope shows definite signs of having developed in three stages, consisting of two appendices with one third final addition (leaving aside the fact that in the second century a still further addition of Mark 16:9 — 20 was made) and that because of this, it may not have been part of the author's original plan as he set out to write his Gospel.

The traditional view is further defective in that, as many contemporary scholars have pointed out, it makes the truth of the Christian faith appear to rest upon the findings of the historian and so gives to Christianity a vulnerability which does not properly belong to it.

I just posted this on another topic... change a few words, youll get the point: In an ideal situation, «World Religions» would be part of a «World History» class, unfortunately, in the USA, there are far too many conservative Christians with power to rewrite history, make whole groups of people second class citizens by making laws against them, and travel the world trying to convert non-Christians through our Military, Politicians, humanitarian efforts and more.

Cyprian, having made the point about water and baptism, goes on to look at further scriptural examples, including merging Isaiah 48:21 with John 19:34, to make the point that water from the split rock indicates Christ, «who is the rock, is split open during His passion by a blow from a lance.»

I have come to a point that it makes no sense to keep trying to rehabilitate Christianity to reflect some type of humanity when simply going directly to the truth is far simpler.

In addition to the lack of coordination among the bilateral and multilateral dialogues and to the problem of achieving, within the Churches, a binding reception of the results of dialogue, Raiser mentions one reason in particular that makes this reception of the results of dialogue difficult: «The paths thus far traveled «in the ecumenical movement have taken the separated Churches as their starting point and sought to overcome the division by convergence and formal agreement.»

He might have offended his critics less if he had more often used the analogy he gave James G. Blaine when explaining his course on Reconstruction: â $ ˜The pilots on our Western rivers steer from point to point as they call itâ $» setting the course of the boat no further than they can see; and that is all I propose to myself in this great problem.â $ ™ â $ œBoth statements suggest Lincolnâ $ ™ s reluctance to take the initiative and make bold plans; he preferred to respond to the actions of others.

For I would add, «I have no faith at all, I am by nature a shrewd pate, and every such person always has great difficulty in making the movements of faith — not that I attach, however, in and for itself, any value to this difficulty which through the overcoming of it brought the clever head further than the point which the simplest and most ordinary man reaches more easily.»

«Remenber all scpritures are inspired words from God, my point is, Jesus wants us to be more than religious, but obedient.Jefferson is just stating that American Churches have become more corrupted with its religious practices that they have forgotten about jesus along the way.The church has taken scriptures and have use them according to what is pleasing to themselves.Jesus wants us to forget about what is pleasing to ourselves and follow him, be like him, love him (means be obedient to him) and ignore what we have known as religion.I define religion as jefferson is using in the video as an act of man pretending or decieving himself into believing that he know God and that he is better than others.He shows that by what he know / pratice not really whats in his heart and by serving how we choose which is pleasing to us, so we use God as a vessel praticing holy rituals teaching what we have made tradition and we have a eternal life with God.God created religion in order for us to remenber him and have a personal relationship with him through his son regardless of the many mistakes we have made in the past.We need to remenber God Forgets our past «he sperate our sins from us as far as the east is from the west».

The points he makes were about the OT and then indirectly to what would be spoken in the NT - but I wont insult you further.

So far as religious conceptions were able to touch this reality - feeling, they would be believed in in spite of criticism, even though they might be so vague and remote as to be almost unimaginable, even though they might be such non-entities in point of whatness, as Kant makes the objects of his moral theology to be.

So far so good; pragmatism has made a similar point.

I think the point can scarcely be made more cogently than a member of this panel, the Rev. James Wall, has done in a recent editorial in the journal he edits: «As for nudity, anyone obtaining salacious pleasure from those terrifying moments is already dead to the rest of life, and hardly a subject for further stimulation.»

He also grants the common - sense view that a human corpse is a dead thing as a human body, but he still makes his panpsychistic point by insisting that even a corpse is composed of many living things and, as far as our knowledge runs, nothing else.29 In addition, he claims that his belief that there is only a relative and not an absolute distinction between mind and matter is given support by recent developments in physics that have shown that the differences between matter and various kinds of radiation are differences of degree and not of kind.

So far as I am aware, our opponents have made no serious effort to answer or rebut this point.»)

There is one further point that would be worth making here.

Many of our opinion leaders make a point of ignoring the current pope, but he may have sniffed a change in the eschatological wind far before anyone else.

Yet there comes the point when we can't strive intellectually any further, and we have to be content with trusting that somehow, somewhere, there is a level where it all makes sense.

and to be fair to both of you (I've made a point to pretty mean - spirited thus far), I have always found evolutionary science and the concept of the big bang to be very very confusing and deep.

Consequently, far more to the point would be the deliberate development and institutionalization of practices within and among theological schools that would make prominent the theological school's own particular agenda of interests in congregations, encourage inquiry governed by that agenda, and reward such inquiry in its processes of promotion and assigning of scholarly status and esteem.

As Ransom points out, you need to go far beyond just pitching with something like, «I'm a new winery trying to enter the U.S. market» or «My winery has been making wines for decades.»

These really are simple to put together, and you can make them almost as far ahead of time as you'd like (with only 3 days left before Christmas, I see how that isn't a big selling point, but it's a concept — go with it).

He'd scribbled down the figures and did the math himself on a scrap of paper, but he'd obviously made a mistake, maybe carried the decimal point over two spaces too far.