There definitely seems to be a specific cutoff or threshold where
further reductions in calories will have detrimental effects.
Not exact matches
The heart of my program is the elimination, or at the very least, drastic
reduction of grains and sugar
in your diet, which is a
far simpler way of restricting your
calorie intake naturally, and thereby potentially increasing your lifespan, without suffering.
And, looking at the effect from a different angle, a person who is experiencing a 25 percent
reduction in metabolism not only would have difficulty losing weight, but actually would have to reduce their
calorie intake even
further just to keep from gaining a pound of weight each week.
However I find that dietiticians seem to be very very
far into the «eat less» or «eat this not that» and are completely wrong because they are still
in the
calorie reduction line of reasoning.
In order to counter a reduction in RMR you'd have to reduce food and calorie intake even further, which would probably lead to a further reduction in RM
In order to counter a
reduction in RMR you'd have to reduce food and calorie intake even further, which would probably lead to a further reduction in RM
in RMR you'd have to reduce food and
calorie intake even
further, which would probably lead to a
further reduction in RM
in RMR.