Unless we see a further escalation, this concern should fade over time — and the Algerian government & the oil companies (and the US government) are obviously motivated to suppress
any further terrorist threats & potential.
Not exact matches
For a region craving stability, instability in Saudi Arabia threatens to
further exacerbate regional conflicts, fueling sectarianism that could raise the
terrorist threat.
That this House notes that ISIL poses a direct
threat to the United Kingdom; welcomes United Nations Security Council Resolution 2249 which determines that ISIL constitutes an «unprecedented
threat to international peace and security» and calls on states to take «all necessary measures» to prevent
terrorist acts by ISIL and to «eradicate the safe haven they have established over significant parts of Iraq and Syria»;
further notes the clear legal basis to defend the UK and our allies in accordance with the UN Charter; notes that military action against ISIL is only one component of a broader strategy to bring peace and stability to Syria; welcomes the renewed impetus behind the Vienna talks on a ceasefire and political settlement; welcomes the Government's continuing commitment to providing humanitarian support to Syrian refugees; underlines the importance of planning for post-conflict stabilisation and reconstruction in Syria; welcomes the Government's continued determination to cut ISIL's sources of finance, fighters and weapons; notes the requests from France, the US and regional allies for UK military assistance; acknowledges the importance of seeking to avoid civilian casualties, using the UK's particular capabilities; notes the Government will not deploy UK troops in ground combat operations; welcomes the Government's commitment to provide quarterly progress reports to the House; and accordingly supports Her Majesty's Government in taking military action, specifically airstrikes, exclusively against ISIL in Syria; and offers its wholehearted support to Her Majesty's Armed Forces.
«That this house notes that ISIL poses a direct
threat to the United Kingdom; welcomes United Nations Security Council Resolution 2249 which determines that ISIL constitutes an «unprecedented
threat to international peace and security» and calls on states to take «all necessary measures» to prevent
terrorist acts by ISIL and to «eradicate the safe haven they have established over significant parts of Iraq and Syria»;
further notes the clear legal basis to defend the UK and our allies in accordance with the UN Charter; notes that military action against ISIL is only one component of a broader strategy to bring peace and stability to Syria; welcomes the renewed impetus behind the Vienna talks on a ceasefire and political settlement; welcomes the Government's continuing commitment to providing humanitarian support to Syrian refugees; underlines the importance of planning for post-conflict stabilisation and reconstruction in Syria; welcomes the Government's continued determination to cut ISIL's sources of finance, fighters, and weapons; notes the requests from France, the US and regional allies for UK military assistance; acknowledges the importance of seeking to avoid civilian causalities; using the UK's particular capabilities; notes the Government's will not deploy UK troops in ground combat operations; welcomes the Government's commitment to provide quarterly progress reports to the House; and accordingly supports Her Majesty's Government in taking military action, specifically airstrikes, exclusively against ISIL in Syria; and offers its wholehearted support to Her Majesty's Armed Forces.»
«Whilst there is still no evidence of
further threats, you'll understand our determination is to find out if either he acted totally alone, inspired perhaps by
terrorist propaganda, or if others have encouraged, supported or directed him.
He went
further to commend the gallant men and women of the Nigerian Armed Forces and other security agencies, for their tireless efforts towards completely eliminating the scourge of Boko Haram
Terrorists and other
threats to the nation's security.
For one thing, serious
terrorist assassination
threats have caused RISS» members to flee both to neighboring Turkey and even
further afield to Germany.
CCLA continues to argue against disproportionate knee - jerk reactions to
terrorist threats — such responses overlook the robust broad powers already existing in the Criminal Code and other laws in place — and argue for more and more state powers and new offences which may cast a
far - too - wide and ineffective net, while simultaneously threatening to normalize exceptional powers.