Sentences with phrase «further than war»

If you are more of a sniper, look no further than War mode.

Not exact matches

Reaction from lawmakers was far more positive than anyone could have predicted during the Bush - era estrangement of France and the U.S. over the Iraq War.
It's far more important at this phase to win the standards war than to make money.
He declined to give further details but the Syrian Observatory for Human Rights, a Britain - based monitor of the war, said the handover had happened on Monday and involved fewer than 10 villages.
It explained how War had come to be flooded with far more prescription pain medicines than its population could ever reasonably or safely consume.
The annual death toll far exceeds the total number of U.S. military killed in more than a decade of wars in Iraq and Afghanistan combined.
No tool of war has come further in the last 25 years than drones, or unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs).
Even if your own brand is far less known than Star Wars, there are several lessons we can learn from the lead - up to Episode VII:
«The free trade, or freer trade, that we've had since the end of the Second World War has been the great engine which has lifted up literally hundreds of millions of people out of poverty — far more than any aid programs,» Hufbauer says.
In the high - profile tussle for 6,000 wireless patents from bankrupt Nortel Networks, Google kicked off the tug - of - war with a stalking horse bid of $ 900 - million — far greater than anyone expected.
Kashuv has become part of a culture war far bigger and older than him taking place between liberals and conservatives over one of the most divisive issues in America.
As I sat with a few people and «war - gamed» what the next recession will look like, a general agreement emerged that the credit markets will be far more volatile than they were last time, even though banks are better capitalized today than they were 10 years ago.
The United States was by far the most powerful nation after the war and held far more gold than anyone else as well.
Religion has been around far longer than anti-religion and look where it has gotten us: wars, famine, poverty, racism, torture, sickness, etc...
You people need to look no farther than in your mirror and your history of murder and war to prove who believes in the right boogeyman to see where evil lives.
The details of law and the vital debates over the personhood of the fetus mattered far less than the success of a continuing ideological war to liberate women from male domination, orthodox religion, and oppressive notions of traditional sexual morality.
As an aside, the irony might be lost on you that, despite the fact that so many atheists here are so quick to note that believers do not have a monopoly on morals, you are essentially proving the point of believers that, from a historical perspective, atheists far more than believers have lacked morals vis - a-vis war and death.
This year, Hillary Clinton has better policy proposals to help improve the lives of women, children, and families than Donald Trump, whose pro-life convictions are lukewarm at best, and whose mass deportation plan would rip hundreds of thousands of families apart, whose contempt for Latinos, Muslims, refugees and people with disabilities would further marginalized the «least of these» among us, and whose support for torture and targeting civilians in war call into question whether Christians who support him are truly pro-life or simply anti-abortion.
It was clear that their paper was substantial and reflected far more than how they felt about nuclear war after eating breakfast one morning.
If conservative Christians continue to treat LGBT people as second - class citizens and cry persecution every time they don't get their way, they will lose far more than the culture wars.
Yet the scale of the air war has gone far beyond the UN authorization, as did the continuing escalation of the war aims so that by February 15 Pentagon projections were assuming the demand for unconditional surrender rather than withdrawal, and by February 25 flanking actions were undertaken to prevent withdrawal.
«Of all religions, secular and otherwise,» Rummel positions Marxism as «by far the bloodiest — bloodier than the Catholic Inquisition, the various Catholic crusades, and the Thirty Years War between Catholics and Protestants.
It is a wholesome fact that in the recent war, far more than in any previous one, there was recognition that we are all embroiled in the sin which brought the conflict into being.
Then later, he decides that «these wars are fought by politicians and pundits far more than by ordinary Americans.»
Quoting from the article,»... these wars are fought by politicians and pundits far more than by ordinary Americans.»
We would have far less wars, and people would actually care about each other rather than thinking only about themselves, as christianity teaches.
Secondly our countries were effected far more by WW1 & 2 than it is by our own people, then again it was effected longer by the cold war between Cap & Com.
In fact, we might see Eid Al Ahda and Rosh Hashanah as far more advanced than the rest of the world precisely because these holidays call to consciousness this repressed but real tendency to pass on the pain that was done to us onto our children, and to remind us that the great spiritual leader Abraham was able to NOT DO IT, thereby giving us the message that we too need not sacrifice our children either actually by supporting the war machine or symbolically by passing onto them various other forms of hurt, oppression and cruelty.
As perhaps the most savage crimes in history, the terrorists» acts should have been met with a swift, forceful response far more targeted than the present war has been.
Any biblically based seeking after peace must begin with the notion that peace, understood as shalom, is far broader than the absence of war.
James Davison Hunter and Alan Wolfe disagreed fiercely over the reach and power of the culture wars, but they agreed on one thing: These wars are fought by politicians and pundits far more than by ordinary Americans.
It took a prophet to know that the First World War was a revelation instead of a mere war, but the common citizen knows that the present struggle is far more than a wWar was a revelation instead of a mere war, but the common citizen knows that the present struggle is far more than a wwar, but the common citizen knows that the present struggle is far more than a warwar.
Me too Roger — I had enough of these politicians on a mission for God with George W. Bush and his three wars in the Middle East that cost us blood far more precious than the neocons made in money off those wars — not to mention the grief he cost us with his NAFTA and TARP set up to bail out his Wall Street cohorts.
Private companies taking full responsibility for their products is far more effective at promoting food safety than any government inspection program and the War on Drugs has done much to ruin what little liberty we have left.
Yet there is little doubt that race equality is practiced further under Communism than is general in the democracies of the West, and it is certain that our racial inequalities, though exaggerated, are a chief weapon in the psychological war against us.
Honestly, I spent nearly 5 years away with some war thingie that rather got my attention far more than this idiot or the other morons preaching lunacy.
Some persons perhaps, crushed by the burden of medical expenses, had no objection to a cold - war garrison state as such, yet they could wonder about a nation that spent far more on weapons than on health coverage.
He's NOT god he's NOT infallable, fine we are all only human but to deny there are better players out there than the ones he has is 1) arrogant and 2) a plain lie To justify the teams failing using the same old rhetoric year in year out while attempting to justify why improvements were not made (by stying in budget and spending the touted «war chest money») is again pure arrogance, (I would say stupidity but AW is far from stupid) and then to blame this seasons failure on the fans attitude is just blatantly direspecting people who in a large part pay part of his wages.
Like with all stereotypes, the Mommy Wars conflict is far more complicated than that.
... Delight in smooth - sounding platitudes, refusal to face unpleasant facts, desire for popularity and electoral success irrespective of the vital interests of the State, genuine love of peace and pathetic belief that love can be its sole foundation, obvious lack of intellectual vigour in both leaders of the British Coalition Government, marked ignorance of Europe and aversion from its problems in Mr. Baldwin, the strong and violent pacifism which at this time dominated the Labour - Socialist Party, the utter devotion of the Liberals to sentiment apart from reality, the failure and worse than failure of Mr. Lloyd George, the erstwhile great war - time leader, to address himself to the continuity of his work, the whole supported by overwhelming majorities in both Houses of Parliament: all these constituted a picture of British fatuity and fecklessness which, though devoid of guile, was not devoid of guilt, and, though free from wickedness or evil design, played a definite part in the unleashing upon the world of horrors and miseries which, even so far as they have unfolded, are already beyond comparison in human experience.
They tell you far more than any number of news reports on Theresa May's «war Cabinet».
In general, democracies may not be the harbingers of progressive public spending, at least at first (war ironically appears a better predictor of increased taxes and spending), but they engage far less in arbitrary expropriation than do autocracies.
Romney may well have no intention of starting a trade war with China or of supporting Israel to a far greater extent than Obama.
The real issue is not, however, that Romney's neo-con inspired foreign policy will inevitably lead the U.S. to ideologically - justified war but because his reckless use of such rhetoric highlights his inexperience in foreign policy and may create far greater problems than he realises.
Indeed, contemporary constitution drafters quite rightly pay far more attention to post-World War II constitutions, including those of Germany, France, Spain, and, especially recently, South Africa, than the sclerotic 1787 Constitution of the United States.
The War Powers Resolution requires the President to notify Congress within 48 hours of committing armed forces to military action and forbids armed forces from remaining for more than 60 days, with a further 30 - day withdrawal period, without a Congressional authorization for use of military force (AUMF) or a declaration of war by the United StatWar Powers Resolution requires the President to notify Congress within 48 hours of committing armed forces to military action and forbids armed forces from remaining for more than 60 days, with a further 30 - day withdrawal period, without a Congressional authorization for use of military force (AUMF) or a declaration of war by the United Statwar by the United States.
This may not be war, but the strategic U-turn for the country is more significant than even that of the joining of the EC in 1973, when the size, the reach and the significance of the Community was far smaller.
Further analysis, however, shows that a greater percentage of recent civil wars involve more than two combatants.
«Without branding all generals and statesmen as murderers or thieves... a portrait of war makers and state makers as coercive and self - seeking entrepreneurs bears a far greater resemblance to the facts than do its chief alternatives: the idea of a social contract, the idea of an open market... the idea of a society whose shared norms and expectations call forth a certain kind of government.»
Casualties include hundreds of websites hacked down in the prime of life, plus the dignity of a number of religious leaders — far less destructive than some other uses of the «net in sectarian war in Iraq in darker days past.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z