Sentences with phrase «further than this philosophy»

If you're looking to promote harmony at home, you don't have to look much further than this philosophy.

Not exact matches

There he was far more warmly received as a Wheaton College representative than he would be at any secular American philosophy conference, and he was given a chance, on television, to testify to his faith in Christ.

Far more leading theologians have allied themselves with analytic, postliberal, and deconstructive movements in contemporary thought than with process philosophy.

In this perspective he was following a trail first blazed by a fellow Alexandrian a century and a half earlier, the Jewish philosopher Philo, a contemporary of Jesus who attempted to clothe the Septuagint in amenable patterns from Greek philosophy, particularly Platonism.11 His synthetic effort is echoed throughout the corpus of Clement's writings, which are far less systematic in approach than one would wish; the Stromata («Miscellanies») is less an orderly treatment of theological topics than a series of notes woven into a tapestry whose warp and woof are difficult to discern.12

everything in the universe evolves, not only life forms but also memes, Religion is a meme so it also change in conformity to its era or time of its conception as faith.Because in pre scientific times thousands of years ago, the scientific method of approach or philosophy has not existed yet, myth or merely story telling is considered facts, The first religion called animism more than 10,000 years ago believed that spirits or god exists in trees, rivers, mountains, boulders or in any places people at that time considered holy.hundreds of them, then when the Greeks and Romans came, it was reduced to 12, they called it polytheism, when the Jews arrived, it was further reduced to 1, monotheism.its derivatives, Christianity And Islam and later hundreds of denominations that includes Mormonism and Protestants flourished up to today.So in short this religions evolved in accordance to the scientific knowledge of the age or era they existed.If you graph the growth of knowledge, it shows a sharp increase in the last 500 years, forcing the dominant religions at that time to reinterprete their dogmas, today this traditional religions are becoming obsolete and has to evolve to survive.But first they have to unify against atheism.in the dialectical process of change, Theism in one hand and the opposing force atheism in the other, will resolve into a result or synthesis.The process shall be highlighted in the internet in the near future.

My comments thus far reflect an effort to take seriously the possibility of a «pro-life» philosophy and to examine what that might entail other than opposition to abortion.

Further Lucas has examined my argument and evidence that part of Russell's constructive metaphysics was a philosophy of events and process, and had this been elaborated, rather than only the epistemology of Human Knowledge, Its Scope and Limits, there could have been a collaboration in a cooperative Process and Reality.

I here make two comments: that the resulting interpretation of the nature of the world is far easier to reject than to make one's own; and that it is peculiarly vulnerable to attack by linguistic - analysis philosophy.

The detailed framework of Whitehead's philosophy is far less known than his aphorisms, for example: «Christianity has always been a religion seeking a metaphysic ’28 — with the implication that it never rests in any one metaphysic, or philosophy.

If so, the reconstruction of philosophy undertaken by Whitehead in terms of the «needs Process and Reality was intended to meet» (WEP 134) was on a far more sweeping scale than the solution of the problem of repeatability and unrepeatability.

Descartes himself acknowledged that his cogito ergo sum is already fundamental in Augustine's philosophy (letter to Colvius, 14 November, 1640), and he believed that his philosophy was the first to demonstrate the philosophical truth of the doctrine of transubstantiation, and could go so far as to claim that scholastic philosophy would have been rejected as clashing with faith if his philosophy had been known first (letter to Mersenne, 31 March, 1641) Indeed, nothing is more revolutionary in modern philosophy than its dissolution of the scholastic distinction between natural theology and revealed theology.

And, they'll ignore the fact that the Democratic philosophy is far more in touch with christian beliefs than the GOP.

As far as the Bretton Woods organisations, the World Bank, the IMF and the WTO, are concerned, they require total transformation, following a philosophy that meets the integral goals of the economy, i.e. the satisfaction of human needs rather than alignment with the satisfaction of capital accumulation.

The modest revival of interest in medieval philosophy in the past forty years might augur a change in fortunes for reasoned discussion of how to understand God's role in all three religions, but one finishes these two lucid books far more aware of lost opportunities than of newfound hope.

I know the history of philosophy far better than I do current science, except some small parts of the latter having to do with sensation and animal behavior.

Such cosmologies are almost always «vitalistic» in the sense of requiring auxiliary and somewhat ad hoc hypotheses to account for the apparent violation of the law of entropy in the impetus toward greater complexity manifested in the evolutionary process.6 Evolutionary cosmologies thus perpetuate a much older tradition of Romantic Naturphilosophie far more than providing a fully contemporary philosophy of science or some sort of «scientifically - verified» philosophy.7

As such, it searches for further answers than a philosophy of concrescence and self - determination can give.

Gil you have asked some very good questions why does bad things happen in the world i personally do nt know God did nt explain to Job either why he had to suffer.What i do know is that God desires that none of us should perish but that all would have eternal life in him through Jesus Christ.This world will one day pass away and the real world will be reborn so our focus as christians is on whats to come and being a witness in the here and now.Both good and bad happens to either the righteous or the sinner so what are we to make of that.What we do know is that God will set all things right at the appointed time the wicked will be judged and the righteous will be rewarded for there faith isnt that enough reason for us to believe.Free will is only a reality if we can choose between good and bad but our hearts are deceitfully wicked we naturally are inclined toward sin that is another reason whyt we need to be saved from ourselves so what are we to do.For me Christ died and rose again that is a fact witnessed by over 500 people that were alive at the time and was recorded by historians how many other religious leaders do you know that did that or did the miracles that Jesus did.As far as the bible is concerned much of the archelogical evidence has proven to be correct and many of prophetic words spoken many hundreds of years ago have come to pass including both the birth and the death of Jesus.Interested in what philosophy you are believing in if other than a faith in Jesus Christ so how does that philosophy give you the assurance that you are saved.Its really simple with christianity we just have to believe in Jesus Christ.brentnz

I do not claim that this was Whitehead's final doctrine, but I do maintain that it accords well with many of the distinctive features of «the philosophy of organism» and is better suited to further development, and to application, than is the orthodox interpretation of Whitehead's final synthesis.

It seems to me, therefore, that the metaphysical background of process thought is far more germane to the evolutionary picture provided by biology than is the mechanistic philosophy, implicit or explicit, that so often accompanies evolutionary theory.

If you had actually watched the video, you would clearly see her say that her friends, atheists included, had long told her that her philosophies were far more incompatible with Christianity than atheism.

When the astronomical revolution of the sixteenth century — in which the Italian philosophers of the Renaissance played a far more important role than historians of science admit — removed the universal cosmic clock, there were two alternative ways open to physics and philosophy of nature: either to retain the relational theory of time and to hold with Bruno (Bruno 1879, p. 144) that «there are as many times as there are the stars» (tot tempora quot astra), since there is no body possessing a privileged rotation motion, and the only body which allegedly had it — the sphere of the fixed stars — has been swept away; or to save the unity and homogeneity of time by separating it from any particular motion — and this is what Newton did, anticipated in this respect by Isaac Barrow and, in particular, Gassendi.

The metaphysical background of process thought is far more germane to the evolutionary picture provided by biology than is the mechanistic philosophy.

How far such an attempt can succeed is of course another question, but in the last resort it is no more relevant than the insight that conclusive knowledge is impossible in any science or philosophy.

In my experience, avoiding or restricting myself the pleasure of enjoying all types of foods has far worse consequences on my eating habits, and overall health than when I approach eating with the «everything in moderation» philosophy.

to take over at arsenal in the not to far disatant future he would be a steady pair of hands to ensure we shoudln't have a melt down like man united, and it would be a continuous progression of the clubs philosophy from wenger, but koeman does tend to tighen up hs teams defenses better than wenger though.

Nice article... I used to be one of those staunch Wenger fans through the years... I used to believe he is superior than Sir Alex, because with almost nothing to spend and playing with kids, he managed to keep us up there every year... I was really caught up with that half season wonder we used to show... In the summer 2013, him or the board (I don't recall) came out and said we are much stable financially and now we can fight with the biggest bullies, I got my hopes high, I thought we are definitely signing a top striker and DM, that what we need... What happened, only hours before the window closed we managed to sign a top AMF (remember we have our best player for the season 2012 - 2013 was AMF, Cazorla if you remember), I was really depressed seen Giroud leading the line every match... then comes winter window, and we were right there top of the table... My friend send me a poster of an elephant on a tree, and on the bottom of it «no one knows how it got there but everybody knows how it will get down»... I told my friend that we are only one decent striker far from the gold... and what happened, we signed an old injured DM on loan... That for me was a completely arrogance and stubbornness cost us the league title... There I completely lost the plot with Wenger... I wish yesterday I was with those who raised that banner... I would write in my banner «Enough talks and philosophy, we need results»

When I read the post and then Amanda's article, A French Feminist Fights the New Feminine Mystique, as a woman who values both female liberties and the philosophies on which attachment parenting is based, I felt compelled to take my thoughts further than the comment section below either would allow.

For others it goes far deeper than that — part of a philosophy of being close to the baby whenever possible.

John Maynard Keynes; a life - long Liberal, Keynes» political and economic philosophy is over-trivialised, but was in fact far more subtle and powerful than is often realised.

«Far too much teaching at school has already degenerated into this kind of debate (think, for example, of religious education or philosophy), more suitable for the pub than the schoolroom,» Baroness Warnock argues.

This goes further than the current philosophy in the United States, where, for instance, nanoscale particles of titanium dioxide (a chemical used in sunscreens and paints) are not considered different from larger - scale particles of titanium dioxide.

In Australia we've always had a «fair go» philosophy; it's far better to occasionally be proved wrong, and possibly to have someone take advantage of you or mistreat you, than to spend your life experiencing the unpleasant emotions that accompany constant mistrust of others.

Whenever considering a specific style of education, it is far more important to consider the specific school, more than the philosophy.

Production of the C5 began in 1997 and ended with the 2004 model year, and it was a far better representation of «Vette philosophy than the deservedly under - appreciated C4.

Following my editorial on the aimed at Cleaning Up The Confusion Between BlackBerry & BlackBerry Mobile, Steve was more than willing to come on the show to further clarify things for us and shed a lot more light on the BlackBerry Mobile and their philosophy as the look to continue to build BlackBerry Smartphones for years to come.

In my opinion, this recommendation is a dangerous one, because the recommended fund has a different and far more risker investment philosophy than the original fund.

A core part of our savings / investing philosophy is to «keep it simple»; we can make far more money by applying ourselves in our careers than by spending time and mental energy worrying about rental units.

Johns philosophy is far more thorough than I've detailed here, but these are a few key points.

Regardless, his philosophy of going «farther than any man has been before me,» should be inspiring to us all.

And feminism served Bourgeois less as philosophy than strategy — the death of her husband of 40 years almost undid her; her sons, far from castrated or discarded, became professionals of consequence; and she didn't destroy her feckless father, she just outlived him.

There is a far more in the future than is dreamed of in your philosophy, dear misanthropes.

In my opinion, the philosophy and attitudes expressed here — concerns about potential critics being on «the scent» — and the associated conduct — withholding adverse information about verification r ^ 2 statistics and big misses — are far more repugnant than revealing the identity of a peer reviewer.

«My concern is that far too much of Islam has come to resemble a violent political philosophy more than peace - loving religion,» he said in an email.

If you want to read usually understandable, even by non-lawyers and academics, texts on the philosophy of law — i.e. including what «law» means and how law is made, in common law systems, you could do far worse than to start with HLA Hart «Concept of Law», Dworkin «Law's Empire» and Rawls «A Theory of Justice».

Arguments around exclusive titles, developer support, and even price would all be rendered moot if Microsoft could achieve what Valve, with its Steam machine philosophy, couldn't — all in a package far cheaper than your standard gaming PC.

Therapeutic practitioners and practices show far more divergence than is dreamt of in the philosophies of biomedical researchers.