Sentences with phrase «further upside potential»

Clearly this should offer further upside potential (and hopefully shareholders will see some further re-valuation gains), but it's no longer a special situation - type investment.

Based on recent experiences for U.S. banks, we think European banks have further upside potential, despite double - digit returns in 2017.

Furthermore, the venture debt fund can sometimes negotiate warrants (a right to buy stock) for further upside potential.

«I do think that EUR / USD has further upside potential and that much of the drive this year will come from expectations regarding a less accommodative ECB.

Not exact matches

But, the potential upsides to allowing states to declare bankruptcy are far too compelling to dismiss outright.

Despite promising growth prospects in the Permian and other efforts supporting the dividend and the potential for share buybacks, a widening valuation multiple at Chevron Corporation (NYSE: CVX) is not justifiable, according to «Further Upside For Chevron Is Unjustified, BMO Analyst Says» by Shanthi Rexaline.

... there is still a good chance that the stock market could remain bumpy near term... downside risk is very minimal... upside potential far exceeds the downside.

There is a lot of potential upside in the form of further cost cuts but it is looking increasingly unlikely.

The $ 104 billion figure was viewed as far too high for a company with a still - unproven revenue model and questionable upside potential for growth that would rely far too much on new market share in India and China as opposed to a domestic market that was already saturated (and even losing memberships by the millions).

We've been early / wrong so far, but remain optimistic about the upside potential.

The technical in litecoin are indicating potential for further upside in the price, in particular if it can break through the previous swing high from October of about $ 68.

This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits

As far as with Mariota, you could not ask for anyone else to be a humble guy, high - class individual, untapped potential and upside as a player, and overall down - to - Earth person who loves helping others, and is a stout example for kids to grow - up too.

«The downside risk to speaking at the convention far outweighs any upside potential,» Greenberg said.

At the most, I'll probably sell some farther out of the money puts, just so I have some more upside potential with a decent cushion before I take a loss again.

But presuming your quantitative stock valuation process is nailed down, then stock selection is obviously a far more qualitative process... it's certainly not about ranking & selecting stocks purely in terms of their upside potential.

In reality, FX losses you might experience are sure to be far smaller than the potential stock upside you hope to realize.

After all, they haven't come this far to suddenly give up now — in for a penny, in for a few trillion more, I say... And any upside surprise in growth (leaving aside how ersatz it might be, or not) is likely to be greeted with delight by investors ultimately, and could well prompt a potential step - change in corporate earnings expectations & valuations.

Technically, it's a good writeup / analysis, but considering the judging panel I'm surprised it won — i.e. despite the potential / emerging markets «upside», no new fund manager (let alone a hedge fund manager) has touched Avon for years now as far as I know...

The FATV Investment merits further attention as it is the largest non-cash asset on the balance sheet and the one with the greatest potential upside.

Even in such a case, however, the stock would have become even cheaper, with further reduced downside and increased upside potential.

I'm a rabid value investor, but catalyst (s) hopefully offer or help me avoid the following: i) realizing a potential 75 % upside is not that exciting if it takes 7 years to do it, or ii) I want to add an extra edge to my (hoped for) value edge, or iii) being taken out by a takeover bid if it is only prompted by a further slide in the share price, etc..

-- Can't STRESS this one enough: If I identify a stock as under - valued, it doesn't necessarily mean I'd touch it with a barge - pole, regardless of upside potential... obviously, there are far more quantitative & qualitative factors to consider before buying a stock!

Setting a higher upside potential hurdle for small - caps is subtly different, but a far more effective approach.]

They can also offer better diversification & lower correlation in your portfolio — the possible opportunity & upside you see may be much less dependent on the economy & the market (but far more dependent on that potential transformation & value being realized).

Of course, I've provided limited financial info., so plse drill into any interesting candidates further to confirm, revise (as you see fit), and / or refresh my valuation, and to rank them on other characteristics than just potential upside.

Despite that rally, it still offers far greater relative upside than CLNY, with my last $ 7.80 Fair Value per FIG share (more recent news - flow suggests that should be raised) pointing to a current 89 % Upside Poteupside than CLNY, with my last $ 7.80 Fair Value per FIG share (more recent news - flow suggests that should be raised) pointing to a current 89 % Upside PoteUpside Potential.

And looking at the elevated valuations of (far less compelling) income & defensive stocks today, it's not difficult to argue companies who offer genuine long term secular growth (regardless of the economic environment), may actually deliver far superior risk / reward & upside potential from current levels.

Demanding greater upside potential from certain stocks (like micro-caps) is a subtly different & far more useful approach to adopt.]

But meanwhile, there's far more compelling / immediate investment alpha & upside potential to be harvested here:

My experience so far has been that rebalancing removes too much of the upside potential while offering very little downside protection.

Setting a higher upside potential hurdle for small - caps is subtly different, but a far more effective approach.»

[I've never been able to get excited about the whole IFA business myself — asset managers offer far higher margins & much greater upside potential!].

Continued / further clarity re strategy is crucial here, but the size of Conwert's balance sheet & market cap, its reasonable leverage, a continued re-orientation of its portfolio, and a strong awareness of its large NAV discount, all seem to suggest significant upside potential for the share price.

Picking new stocks is not just about choosing those with the highest upside potential — there are far more quantitative, and qualitative, factors that go into any final choice on a stock.

Actually, this probably understates Upside Potential, which would be enhanced by i) any further share buybacks (at a discount to NAV), ii) any NAV increases, based on income / capital gains (I won't speculate on this, but note the v positive income tailwind highlighted previously), and iii) a value realization «event «would likely offer a share price premium, or even NAV.

In my view, and as the pre-ponderance of data across the world demonstrates, pit - bull breeds and children do not mix well and therefore - should not — the potential downside is far too great for the upside of owning a sweet Pitbull when there are NUMEROUS other breeds to chose from.

Over the last decade or so, Tulum real estate has increased dramatically in value, with investors seeing massive returns of up to 300 % or higher, but the market is far from saturated and there is still incredible upside potential for those who buy land in this part of Mexico's Riviera Maya.

On the other hand, further study has vastly lower cost, and other potential upside, even if, as I expect, we find out that the Earth's climate is quite stable due to negative feedbacks.

The question is, however, and especially in the wake of a pretty much across - the - board decline in the cryptocurrency space over the last six weeks or so, just how far can this one go and what sort of timeframes are we looking at when we say that there is real upside potential associated with Stellar and XLM at current rates?

«How attractive this investment is depends on your view on two sources of potential upside: rental increases and further home - price appreciation,» said Goodman of the Urban Institute.

@George Gammon I would concur that the risk on the downside for the San Francisco Bay Area market is far more likely, and much larger than the potential upside right now.