Not exact matches
If we had spent ozil's 42 million on a striker and Alexis 35 on a top midfielder we'd be
far better off.we have too many
attacking /
wide midfielders.ozil, sanchez, ox, theo, gnabry, santi, rosicky, jack, ramsey, campbell yet 2 injuries and defence and we've no 1 left and have a def mid in coquelin on the bench for defensive cover.
Up front we have a few world - class players surrounded by some serious pretenders... Sanchez is by
far the most accomplished player in our
attack but the controversy surrounding his contractual mishandling could see him go before the window closes or most definitely by season's end... obviously a mistake by both parties involved, as Sanchez's exploits have never been more on display than in North London, but the club's irresponsible wage structure and lack of real intent have been the real undoing in this mess... Lacazette, who I think has some world - class skills as a front man, will only be as good as the players and system around him, which is troubling due to our current roster and Wenger's love of sideways passing... Walcott should have been sold years ago, enough said, and Welbeck should never have been brought in from the get - go... both of these players have suffered numerous injuries over their respective careers and neither are good enough to overcome such difficulties: not to mention, they both are below average first - touch players, which should be the baseline test for any player coming to a Wenger - led Arsenal team... Perez should have been played
wide left or never purchased at all; what a huge waste of time and money, which is ridiculous considering our penny pinching ways and the fact that fans had been clamoring for a real striker for years... finally Giroud, the fact that he stills wears the jersey is a direct indictment of this club's failure to get things right... this isn't necessarily an
attack on Giroud because I think he has some highly valued skills, but not for a team that has struggled to take their sideways soccer to the next level, as his presence slows their game even more, combined with our average, at best, finishing skills...
far too often those in charge have either settled or chosen half - measures and ultimately it is us that suffer because no matter what happens Wenger, Gazidis and Kroenke will always make more money whereas we will always be the ones paying for their mistakes... so every time someone suggests we should just shut - up and support the team just think of all the sacrifices you've made along the way and simply reply... f *** off
Danny Welbeck is also set to return in the coming weeks, and will also provide
further competition for the central role, as well as the
wider attacking places, which may well push Lucas
further down the pecking order.
It would have been a
far more direct approach and it would have been
far easier to
attack on the counter with a greater breadth of field to play the ball into instead of a central ball first then a ping out
wide.
With di Maria preferring to operate in similar areas to Mata —
attacking midfield and
wide on the left — it could be hard for both to be accommodated in the same team, particularly if Louis van Gaal sticks with the 3 -4-1-2 system that he has used so
far this season.
This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into
wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can
attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out
wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply
far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box
far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position
far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-
attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits
But in
attack we were relentless and if rumours were to be believed we searched
far and
wide and players like Malcom Filipe from Bordeaux, Lucas Moura from PSG — Now with Tottenham, Cristian Pavón of Boca Juniors, were routinely featured as possibilities.
No matter how you slice it, you can't run an uptempo offence with Giroud on the pitch and that means sideways soccer and an over-reliance on crosses into the box, thereby negating many of the very reasons Lacazette was on your radar in the first place... we simply aren't clinical enough from
wide positions to continue with that approach, which is why many fans have been clamoring for a viable alternative to Giroud for several years... once again this isn't an
attack on Giroud, he clearly has some tangible skills, but his mere presence on the pitch greatly impacts your tactical options... Giroud's weaknesses are simply highlighted by the way in which our offence now moves in a more horizontal than vertical manner, which allows most teams ample time to regroup defensively before a scoring opportunity even arises... a player of Ibra's or Benzema's ilk would have been
far more effective as they had size, speed and the first touch capabilities required to for intricate link - up play... once again square peg in a round hole
Was
far too content to just sit behind his marker while we were either forced to play
wide or our more
attacking players came forward to give the option.
Would that be the Kolasinac who, for the first leicester goal, left his posision near the
far post to go for an aimless wander across the front of goal leaving a
wide open space near the
far post for leicester to
attack, which is exactly what they did, this drew Cech away from the goal mouth so the header in to the front of goal left Cech stranded and an open goal for leicester to easily score.
For the first goal Kolasinac left his posision near the
far post to go for an aimless wander across the front of goal leaving a
wide open space near the
far post for leicester to
attack, which is exactly what they did, this drew Cech away from the goal mouth so the header in to the front of goal left Cech stranded and an open goal for leicester to easily score.
Man United boss Louis van Gaal could well do with
further wide -
attacking options with the likes of Juan Mata, Adnan Januzaj and Ashley Young yet to consistently prove themselves under the Dutch manager.
It's hardly as if this is alien to Liverpool — they've done it a number of times this season, but
far more often, the team focusses on
attacking centrally, rather than using
wide spaces.
Milan looked vulnerable defensively, especially in
wide positions, and didn't get going as an
attacking threat with
far too many mediocre individual performances.
Arsenal showed admirable vigour and invention against United but the
wider pattern is that this is
far from the slick
attacking machine of even five years ago.
Redan was supported in
attack by St Clair and the latter fired our first effort at goal after three minutes narrowly
wide of the
far post.
It's assumed that should Jose Mourinho take over in the summer that Rashford's route to
further establishing himself in United's first - choice line - up would be blocked so with that in mind, how would the team look if Lukaku was used to augment the strongest options available out
wide and in
attack?
Yet this
wide - ranging bill is just the first step in a
far bigger
attack on workers» rights.
Indeed, one important trend in the Tell MAMA data helps to underscore its
wider importance: a large proportion of anti-Muslim
attacks seem to derive from
far - right activists or groups.
The
wide variety of fantastically designed and cartoonish characters are all very enjoyable to use and feel very different from each other with their unique abilities, offering players quite a few options and strategies on how to tackle foes from close up or
far away, with melee
attacks, guns, and magic.
Engaging in a fight with one player leaves you
wide open to
attacks from any of the others, and the ensuing chaos is
further enhanced by team damage as your teammates try to
attack as well.
A
wider array of animations and context - sensitive actions builds upon the fine gunplay of the first two games, and the melee combat builds a little
further on Uncharted 2 «s efforts, adding a greater range of moves, multi-directional
attacks and temporarily grabbed objects.
Like the FCA, the ICO will have
wide - ranging investigatory powers to eg, call for information about cyber
attacks and breaches, as well as
far - reaching enforcement powers including warnings, reprimands, prohibitions, suspensions and financial penalties of up to $ 10m or 2 % of a firm's worldwide annual turnover for systems and controls breaches.