And, aside from a conclusion I won't spoil except to say that it plays exactly like the meta - film twist at the end of Altman's THE PLAYER, Spielberg can't resist to inject a Gumpian «brush with history» as then Assistant Attorney General Rehnquist,
a future Justice of the Supreme Court, calls to advise Bradlee the publication of the papers is prohibited by the Espionage Act of 1917 — just a beat too late to stop the story going to print.
Not exact matches
Ever since 1971, when then -
future Supreme Court Justice Lewis Powell urged corporations to mobilize politically, corporate money has flooded Washington — most
of it into Republican coffers.
Can
future Presidents send a communication to Parliament requesting that a nominee be vetted for appointment as «Super Chief
Justice» or even «Senior
Supreme Court Justice» pursuant to article 144
of the Constitution?
«If you don't believe this election is important, if you think you can sit it out, take a moment to think about the
Supreme Court justices that Donald Trump would nominate and what that would mean to civil liberties, equal rights and the
future of our country,» Sanders said.
Sunlight is said to be the best
of disinfectants, electric light the most efficient policeman,»
future Supreme Court Justice Louis D. Brandeis wrote in 1914.
U.S.
Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg apologized for her «ill - advised» public criticism
of Trump, promising to be more discreet in the
future.
With a
Supreme Court ruling expected in the coming days, the
future of the Affordable Care Act is in the hands
of the
justices.
British Columbia
Supreme Court Justice Bruce Cohen, the commissioner who is overseeing the investigation, is in the unenviable position
of hearing everyone out and making recommendations to ensure the
future sustainability
of the fishery by June 2012.
The first Washington Post article making use
of the Pentagon Papers appears on June 18, despite threats from the
Justice Department, which insists (via a phone call from then assistant attorney general and future chief justice of the US Supreme Court, William Rehn
Justice Department, which insists (via a phone call from then assistant attorney general and
future chief
justice of the US Supreme Court, William Rehn
justice of the US
Supreme Court, William Rehnquist!)
«Once I saw that, I was like, now I have a certain amount
of freedom to explore who was he in this time period,» the star
of the upcoming Black Panther added
of his 1940 - set performance as the
future Supreme Court Justice.
Based on one
of the early cases taken up by
future Supreme Court justice Thurgood Marshall when he was working for the NAACP, the film proceeds without much subtlety, though with a filigree
of witty dialogue and Chadwick Boseman's panache as the wry, natty young attorney.
Chadwick Boseman, Hollywood's go - to guy for playing important Black Americans, adds another icon to his gallery: NAACP attorney and
future Supreme Court justice Thurgood Marshall, a New Yorker dispatched to Bridgeport, Connecticut, to defend a black man, Joseph Spell (Sterling K. Brown), who stands accused
of the rape and attempted murder
of a white society woman, Eleanor Strubing (Kate Hudson).
Based on the incredible true story
of future Supreme Court Justice Thurgood Marshall and one
of the landmark cases
of his life.
«Marshall,» director Reginald Hudlin's legal drama about a key early success in the career
of future U.S.
Supreme Court Justice Thurgood Marshall, will open the 53rd Chicago International Film Festival Oct. 12.
Director: Julie Cohen and Betsy West Cast: Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Gloria Steinem and Nina Totenberg In a political climate filled with cynicism and a sense
of civic decay,
Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg often helps to keep our eyes fixed on a more hopeful
future.
In a new article for Education Next, Arizona
Supreme Court Justice Clint Bolick examines over two dozen
of Gorsuch's major cases to uncover his key dispositions and clues to his
future decisions.
And Kerr wonders: «If it is improper for legislators to try to influence the outcomes
of future cases, why is it perfectly okay for her as a
Supreme Court Justice to try to influence the outcomes
of future legislation?»
Yates went head - to - head with
future Supreme Court Justice John Jay in the gubernatorial campaign
of 1795 but was defeated and returned to practicing the law.
With the passing
of Justice Antonin Scalia, the
future of politics and the
Supreme Court of the United States itself may look a bit terrifying.
In the CLE session, sponsored by the Criminal
Justice Section, Stubbs walked the audience through the current state
of the death penalty in the United States, how racial discrimination affects who is sentenced to death, and how the diminished use
of the death penalty could form the basis for a
future Supreme Court decision abolishing it entirely.
During the hearing, two judges apologized «if the building exceeded legislative intent» and Florida
Supreme Court Justice Charles Canady promised to issue an order that would require closer scrutiny
of future capital projects for
courts.
Most recently, she was a legal intern at the Montana
Supreme Court where she worked for
Justice Beth Baker on Access to Justice Commission projects, including the Public Forum Series on access to justice issues as well as drafting a Forum Report summarizing the findings of that series to use in future advocacy e
Justice Beth Baker on Access to
Justice Commission projects, including the Public Forum Series on access to justice issues as well as drafting a Forum Report summarizing the findings of that series to use in future advocacy e
Justice Commission projects, including the Public Forum Series on access to
justice issues as well as drafting a Forum Report summarizing the findings of that series to use in future advocacy e
justice issues as well as drafting a Forum Report summarizing the findings
of that series to use in
future advocacy efforts.
As suspense grows over the naming
of President Obama's
Supreme Court nominee, so too does discussion in the blogosphere about how to judge the
future Justice.
Supreme Court Justice Lord Briggs has offered words
of reassurance on the
future status
of English common law post-Brexit, in a speech published this week.
After obtaining his law degree at the University
of Toronto, he started out at the firm
of future Supreme Court Justice Ian Binnie, before actually ending up at the OSC for a few years in the 1980s, where he became head
of enforcement.
He told
of how, in framing the test as whether there was a «real risk» that the regime would prevent access to
justice, the
Supreme Court is potentially paving the way for challenges to similar unjust regimes in the
future.
62 «Taking an AXA to Acts
of the Scottish Parliament» [2010] 15 J.R. 163 «Towards a Codified Constitution» (2010)
Justice Journal 74 (co-author) «Procuring the End
of the Promptness Requirement» [2010] 29 C.J.Q. 297 «Practice and Procedure in the New
Supreme Court» [2010] 15 J.R. 1 «Anti-Suit Injunctions and Non-Exclusive Jurisdiction Clauses» [2010] 69 C.L.J. 25 «Contracting Out
of Homelessness Functions» [2009] 14 J.R. 333 «The Permission Stage and Subsequent Use
of Disclosed Material» [2009] 14 J.R. 249 «Arbitration and Litigation after West Tankers» [2009] L.M.C.L.Q. 285 «Bi-Polar Sovereignty Restated» [2009] 68 C.L.J. 361 «Promptness and Judicial Review» [2009] 14 J.R. 113 «A Framework for Fettering» [2009] 14 J.R. 73 «The Continued Rise (and
Future Fall?)
TRUMP WILL USE SAME SCOTUS SHORTLIST FOR NEXT VACANCY: President Trump told The Washington Times he will be using the same list
of candidates for any
future Supreme Court vacancies that he used to select
Justice Neil Gorsuch.
As it turned out, Rehnquist was one
of two
future US
Supreme Court justices whom Neal taught at Stanford; the other was Sandra Day O'Connor.
They did note that at some point in the
future the appropriate factual scenario may arise where the police would have to justify their search
of a cell phone according to the limits described by
Justice Lamer
of the
Supreme Court in R v. Caslake,
In his 8 October speech entitled «Dissenting Judgments — Self Indulgence or Self Sacrifice», Lord
justice Kerr
of the UK
Supreme Court poses this interesting question: «Should the possible
future utility
of a dissent encourage, or should the apparent futility
of a dissent deter an expression
of disagreement with the majority?