(2) «while we're waiting for more
future decades of data, would you say it is prudent to attempt reduction of gas emissions»
Not exact matches
Combining the asylum - application
data with projections
of future warming, the researchers found that an increase
of average global temperatures
of 1.8 °C — an optimistic scenario in which carbon emissions flatten globally in the next few
decades and then decline — would increase applications by 28 percent by 2100, translating into 98,000 extra applications to the EU each year.
There isn't much difference between satellite
data and the seven estimates in the amount
of GMSL growth in the past few
decades, but the shape
of the curves,
of course, suggest very different
future trends.
Climate models, run on powerful computers which use
decades of past and present climate
data to simulate how climate will behave, or has in the past, are the most accurate and reliable source
of information on potential
future climate change.
Climatologists differ on the various causes
of climate change, the rate at which the earth is warming, the effect
of man - made emissions on warming, the most accurate climate
data and temperature sets to use, and the accuracy
of climate models projecting
decades and centuries into the
future.
If natural variations are the dominant cause
of recent warming — as the satellite
data suggests — then the planet may not warm for
decades and the
future beyond that is unknowable.
It includes a growing number
of initiatives at the international and European level, from research networks
of data providers, operational services, impact assessments, to coordination
of government initiatives and provision
of policy - relevant recommendations; all provided on a wide range
of timescales, from few years to
decades and more, referring to the past, the present and the near to far
future.
I would however point out that an instance
of North Dakota flooding or freezing is not «global» nor is it indicative
of a trend — it is regional and is a single event, and let's please not be myopic here and muddle the issues, as it's even worse «science» to take a single isolated event in time and geography and then attempt to extrapolate it out across the entire globe and into
future decades than to depict an out -
of - context «hockey stick»
of historic
data as is being pointed out here.
Utilising the EU's Sentinel satellite network, thousands
of land and marine based sensors, millions
of readings every hour and a century long archive
of data, it will generate the most up to date view
of the global environment and predict
future changes on timescales
of just a few days to
decades in advance.
The AARI charts therefore add significantly to our understanding
of the variability
of Arctic sea ice over the last 8
decades, and we recommend their inclusion in
future historical
data sets
of Arctic sea ice.
We want to show people what the
data says about the
future of the legal market and provide a coherent view
of where the legal market is heading over the next
decade.
We have built over many
decades a quality database
of historical
data with the minds
of many that would have cost individual Boards enormous dollars in duplicative money and the
future calls for more technological innovation to keep, in line with the new world
of business!