And, looking to
future education debates, the UPenn findings suggest journalists should approach social media with more skepticism and deepen their knowledge of how social media advocacy operates.
Not exact matches
Nor has the
debate focused on questions about the
future integrity of the enterprise of theological
education: for example, «How can we strengthen and preserve its financial resources?»
Shaw is an active partner to leaders in government and public and charter
education around the role of independent schools in the vital
debate about the
future of
education.
An
education bill is sparking
debate about how universities receive performance funding and lawmakers are facing an important decision about the
future of the program.
With
education policy set to play an important part in the May general election campaign,
debates around the
future direction of the school system will take place against the backdrop of fast - paced reforms made during the coalition's time in office.
April 2014 —
Future Education Secretary Damian Hinds sponsors a
debate in the House of Commons calling for the cap to be removed.
The High - level panel
debate «Setting the stage» stimulated a
debate on the
future of
education, drawing on the findings of the independent EFA Global Monitoring Report 2015, the regional analyses of some 120 National EFA 2015 Reviews and the publication «Rethinking Education: Towards a global common good
education, drawing on the findings of the independent EFA Global Monitoring Report 2015, the regional analyses of some 120 National EFA 2015 Reviews and the publication «Rethinking
Education: Towards a global common good
Education: Towards a global common good?.»
The second day's lunchtime
debate looked at the various ways in which music
education is provided across the UK — and the tensions and lessons which can be observed — with the aim of considering how music
education might be better provided in
future across the UK.
David Deming, professor of
education and economics at HGSE, accompanied by Andrew Kelly, senior vice president for strategy and policy at the University of North Carolina System; Deborah Santiago, chief operating officer and vice president for policy at Excelencia in Education; and Josh Wyner, founder and executive director of the College of Excellence President and vice president at the Aspen Institute, will debate different viewpoints on the future of higher education, specifically for community
education and economics at HGSE, accompanied by Andrew Kelly, senior vice president for strategy and policy at the University of North Carolina System; Deborah Santiago, chief operating officer and vice president for policy at Excelencia in
Education; and Josh Wyner, founder and executive director of the College of Excellence President and vice president at the Aspen Institute, will debate different viewpoints on the future of higher education, specifically for community
Education; and Josh Wyner, founder and executive director of the College of Excellence President and vice president at the Aspen Institute, will
debate different viewpoints on the
future of higher
education, specifically for community
education, specifically for community colleges.
Two hostile camps dominate
debate about the
future of American public
education.
The editors of
Education Next join inthe
debate on NCLB's
future, assessing the law's shortcomings andprescribing what Congress should do to avert a disaster.
But both groups acted with the same purpose: to inform and highlight the
debate over
education in the 2008 presidential campaign and to influence the
future of the No Child Left Behind Act and other policies of the next president.
The
debate misses important nuances about the evolved role teachers will play in the
education system of the
future, as well as the value technology will provide to enhance teachers» abilities to reach all of their students and practice at the top of their craft.
My personal highlights included inspirational warm - ups from conductor Dominic Peckham and ex-STOMP member Ollie Tunmer and fascinating
debates on the
future of GCSEs and on increasing student engagement, the latter of which was filmed for James Rhodes's upcoming Channel 4 documentary on music
education.
In classes, in study groups, and over coffee in the HGSE Commons, HEP students animatedly
debate the possibilities of MOOCs and alternative pedagogies, the
future of fraternities on campuses, and the pluses and minuses of a federal report card on higher
education.
Healthy
debate is essential if we are to advance the
future of American
education.
It's hard to build America's
future and put
education first when so many
debates in
education are tinged by a growing sense of rigidity that I find troubling.
In 1972, when Congress
debated whether
future federal funding for higher
education should go directly to institutions or be channeled through students, the model of the GI Bill helped carry the day for the latter approach, which was surely the right one.
(I'm told, however, that the pages of
Education Next will soon have a fascinating
debate on this very subject in the not - too - distant
future.)
Over 1,000 influential
education leaders, practitioners and industry experts from across the region are set to attend the inaugural «Bett Middle East Leadership Forum & Expo» where the
future of
education will be
debated and discussed.
The school system currently in place evolved over centuries of back - and - forth
debate about the purpose of
education, the best way to prepare children for their
futures and the right way to test and evaluate kids, schools and states.
Topics include diversity and free - speech dilemmas, the STEM - humanities
debate, sexual assault, the digital
future, the crisis in public funding of
education and much more.
With Congress busy
debating the
future of federal
education policy, here's a thought - provoking statistic: American adults in the 1940s had about the same odds of being a high school graduate as today's Americans have of being a college graduate.
By no means do we suggest that the
debate about the
future of public
education in Los Angeles should be a genteel affair devoid of passion, intensity, and authenticity.
February 16, 2015 (New York)-- As school districts,
education leaders and New York's courts
debate the
future of teacher tenure, Educators 4 Excellence — New York (E4E) members today issued a series of recommendations to preserve job protections but make tenure designations more meaningful.
AROS is working to unite those local efforts to impact the national
debate about the
future of public
education.
The Trust offers an Annual Teacher Training Course which allows teachers to engage in advanced
debates concerning methods of teaching, and the
future of Holocaust
education.
Chris Stewart of
Education Post and blogger extraordinaire gives us food for thought about how to approach the ed reform
debate; and it happens to fits nicely with the March 29th Volume and Light post «They Planning for Our
Future, None Of Us Involved.»
The wisdom of continuing without such cooperative planning is attracting new scrutiny now, when there is broader interest than usual in the city's
education landscape because of a politically charged
debate over traditional school boundaries and the
future of neighborhood schools.
The group hopes to inform the
debate over the
future of career
education; the report comes as the House
education committee members unanimously voted to approve a new federal career
education bill.
As thought leaders
debated the
future of American public
education during the Department of Education's «Education Drive America» 2012 Bus Tour this week, and with more news that the nation's students are falling behind, attention is once again turning to the next great hope in education reform: the Common Core State S
education during the Department of
Education's «Education Drive America» 2012 Bus Tour this week, and with more news that the nation's students are falling behind, attention is once again turning to the next great hope in education reform: the Common Core State S
Education's «
Education Drive America» 2012 Bus Tour this week, and with more news that the nation's students are falling behind, attention is once again turning to the next great hope in education reform: the Common Core State S
Education Drive America» 2012 Bus Tour this week, and with more news that the nation's students are falling behind, attention is once again turning to the next great hope in
education reform: the Common Core State S
education reform: the Common Core State Standards.
Charter schools» ntense rate of growth has fueled an equally intense
debate about the role they'll play in the
future of U.S.
education.
Webinars: The candidates» top
education advisors have
debated the nuances of Obama's and Romney's
education views on everything from the
future of No Child Left Behind (NCLB) to the role of the federal government in funding
education.
The
future of the
Education for All bill, which was due to be
debated this autumn, remains uncertain.
Laurel is one of 16,000 students whose schools»
futures were imperiled by the May court decision reaffirmed Monday, throwing these students into the center of a national
debate about the viability of charter schools — schools that are publicly funded but can be privately run — and the role they play in public
education.
Sticking points included teacher evaluations and job security, provisions at the core of a
debate about the
future of public
education across the nation.»
In the intensifying
debate over the
future of
education, two camps seem to be emerging.
Whether such debtor
education will curb
future bankruptcies is of course subject to
debate.
Born 1982, Auckland, New Zealand
Education 2009 Meisterschule, Städelschule HFBK, Frankfurt am Main 2005 BFA, Elam School of Fine Arts, University of Auckland Solo exhibitions 2018 «Games of Decentralized Life» Galerie Buchholz, Cologne 2018 «The Founder's Paradox», MOCA Museum of Contemporary Art, Cleveland 2017 «The Founder's Paradox», Michael Lett, Auckland 2017 «The Founder's Paradox», Michael Lett, Auckland 2017 «Shenzhen Entrepreneurial Form», Fine Arts, Sydney 2017 «FaaS — Feedback as a Service: Reflecting on messaging,
debate and criticality inside a parliamentary discussion on internet governance», Bozar, Brussels 2017 «Simon Denny: Real Mass Entrepreneurship», C2 Space, OCT - LOFT, OCAT Shenzhen 2017 «Hammer Projects: Simon Denny», Hammer Museum, Los Angeles 2016 «Secret Power», Museum of New Zealand Te Papa Tongarewa, Wellington 2016 «Blockchain
Future States», Petzel Gallery, New York 2016 «Business Insider», WIELS, Brussels 2015 «Products for Organising», Serpentine Sackler Gallery, London 2015 «Secret Power», New Zealand Pavilion, 56th Venice Biennale 2015 «The Innovator's Dilemma», MoMA PS1, New York 2014 «The Personal Effects of Kim Dotcom», Adam Art Gallery, Victoria University, Wellington 2014 «New Management», Portikus, Frankfurt am Main 2014 «The Personal Effects of Kim Dotcom», Firstsite, Colchester 2014 «TEDxVaduz redux», T293, Rome 2014 «Disruptive Berlin», Galerie Buchholz, Berlin 2013 «The Personal Effects of Kim Dotcom», mumok, Wien 2013 «All You Need is Data — The DLD 2012 Conference REDUX rerun», Petzel Gallery, New York 2013 «All You Need is Data — The DLD 2012 Conference REDUX», Kunstverein München 2012 «Full Participation», Aspen Art Museum, Aspen 2012 «Envisaging Vocational Rehabilitation» (with Joanna Fadyl), Westfälischer Kunstverein, Münster 2011 «Corporate Video Decisions», Friedrich Petzel Gallery 2011 «Corporate Video Decisions», Michael Lett, Auckland 2011 «Cruise Line», NAK Neuer Aachener Kunstverein, Aachen 2011 «Chronic Expectation: CFS / ME Documentary Restoration», T293, Rome 2011 «7 Unreachable Elevators», IMO, Copenhagen 2010 «Negative Headroom: the broadcast signal intrusion incident», Contemporary Art Museum, St. Louis 2010 «Negative Headroom: the broadcast signal intrusion incident», Halle Für Kunst, Lüneburg 2010 «Remote Tutorial: hate poems for travelers», Landings Project Space, Vestfossen 2010 «Introductory logic tutorial video», Artspace, Sydney 2009 «Celebrities» houses at night: a projection», Standard Oslo, Oslo 2009 «Starting from behind», Michael Lett, Auckland 2009 «Deep Sea Vaudeo», Galerie Daniel Buchholz, Cologne 2009 «Watching Videos Dry», T293, Naples 2009 «7 Drunken Videos `, Luettgenmeijer, Berlin 2008 «Aquarium Paintings (with Nick Austin)», Center, Berlin 2008 «Ruined by Sheer Confidence», Caribic Residency, Frankfurt am Main 2008 «Alexandra Bircken / Simon Denny», Ursula Blickle Stiftung, Kraichtal 2008 «Recent Haircuts», Uplands Gallery, Melbourne 2008 «Recent Haircuts», Gambia Castle, Auckland 2007 «Compression Club», Michael Lett, Auckland 2007 «Monthly Cowards», Gambia Castle, Auckland 2007 «Paltry Motion», Dunedin Pubic Art Gallery, Dunedin 2006 «Old Entertainment System», Window, Auckland 2006 «Scape», Art & Industry Biennial, Christchurch 2006 «Old Things», Michael Lett, Auckland 2005» Arranging Sympathies», Volume Series, The Physics Room, Christchurch
Scientists and educators successfully argued that such a move would damage the
education and
futures of students by presenting a scientific consensus on an urgent issue as up - for -
debate.
With the Court seemingly poised to strike down affirmative - action in Fisher v. Texas, Elie, Joe and Renwei Chung
debate how we got here and the
future of diversity in higher
education.
A vocal presence online (including her blog), Betsy is a frequent contributor to the ongoing
debate on the
future of legal
education and practice.
J. Med, Sept 2, 1999, accessed 9/2/99; Letter, John A. Gans, American Pharmaceutical Association, to Health Care Financing Administration, Reference HCFA -3002-P, April 12, 1999, accessed at www.aphanet.org, 1/18/2000; Ronald M. Davis, et al, Editorial, Advances in Managing Chronic Disease, 320 BMJ 525 (2000), accessed at www.bmj.com, 2/25/00; Thomas Bodenheimer,
Education and
Debate, disease management in the American Market, 320 BMJ 563 (2000), accessed at www.bmj.com, 2/25/2000; David J. Hunter, disease management: has it a
future?
Law societies and legal associations frequently engage in
debate on the
future of legal
education in Canada.