Our results show that very aggressive
future emissions reduction pathways, in which rapid and deep mitigation begins today (not 5 - 10 years earlier as
Our results show that very aggressive
future emissions reduction pathways, in which rapid and deep mitigation begins today (not 5 - 10 years earlier as in many emissions scenarios), would be approximately consistent with the long - term temperature goals of the Paris Agreement.
Not exact matches
In the near term, federal policy could: i) level the playing field between air captured CO2 and fossil - fuel derived CO2 by providing subsidies or credits for superior carbon lifecycle
emissions that account for recovering carbon from the atmosphere; ii) provide additional research funding into air capture R&D initiatives, along with other areas of carbon removal, which have historically been unable to secure grants; and iii) ensure air capture is deployed in a manner that leads to sustainable net - negative
emissions pathways in the
future, within the framework of near - term national
emissions reductions, and securing 2 °C - avoiding
emissions trajectories.
There have been several proposals discussed by the international community about second commitment period frameworks that would expressly incorporate equity into
future ghg
emissions reductions pathways.
AR5 found the world has the means to limit global warming and build a more prosperous and sustainable
future, but
pathways to limit warming to 2ºC relative to pre-industrial levels would require substantial
emissions reductions over the next few decades.