Carolyn has taken lead roles in multiple high profile litigations which resulted in change to industry standards and the establishment of charitable causes in memory of the deceased victims in the effort to avoid
future harm to other individuals.
Not exact matches
Smart people are unwilling
to be bogged down unnecessarily by
others» mistakes, so they let them go quickly and are assertive in protecting themselves from
future harm.
And were we
to violate existing or
future regulatory orders or consent decrees, we might incur substantial monetary fines and
other penalties that could seriously
harm our business.
A good person is someone who makes an effort not
to unjustly
harm others, and correct their behavior in the
future if they fail.
We should not ignore them, which allows them
to continue
to harm others in the
future.
When some professional researcher observes unethical behavior by
other researchers they are obliged
to report that and investigate what is going on [4]; in some cases, it is even necessary
to become a whistleblower in order
to prevent
future patients from being
harmed or killed (see: «Whistleblowers in Science are Necessary
to Keep Research and Science - based Industries Honest!»).
RE # 37, GW actions have many many
other immediate &
future benefits: they prevent / reduce many
other environmental
harms (local air pollution, acid rain, ground & water pollution, etc.), they are good for the health (e.g., cycling & walking), they reduce crime (cycling, walking), they reduce our implication in foreign conflicts & tax money
to protect oil supplies, they save money without lowering productivity (even increasing it), they save businesses from folding & households from going into hock.
The idea that my GHG emissions of today might be
harming people &
other life forms even far into the
future is as disturbing
to me as
harming people living today.
This is so because in addition
to the theological reasons given by Pope Francis recently: (a) it is a problem mostly caused by some nations and people emitting high - levels of greenhouse gases (ghg) in one part of the world who are
harming or threatening tens of millions of living people and countless numbers of
future generations throughout the world who include some of the world's poorest people who have done little
to cause the problem, (b) the
harms to many of the world's most vulnerable victims of climate change are potentially catastrophic, (c) many people most at risk from climate change often can't protect themselves by petitioning their governments; their best hope is that those causing the problem will see that justice requires them
to greatly lower their ghg emissions, (d)
to protect the world's most vulnerable people nations must limit their ghg emissions
to levels that constitute their fair share of safe global emissions, and, (e) climate change is preventing some people from enjoying the most basic human rights including rights
to life and security among
others.
This is so because: (a) it is a problem mostly caused by some nations and people emitting high - levels of greenhouse gases (ghg) in one part of the world who are
harming or threatening tens of millions of living people and countless numbers of
future generations throughout the world who include some of the world's poorest people who have done little
to cause the problem, (b) the
harms to many of the world's most vulnerable victims of climate change are potentially catastrophic, (c) many people most at risk from climate change often can't protect themselves by petitioning their governments; their best hope is that those causing the problem will see that justice requires them
to greatly lower their ghg emissions, (d)
to protect the world's most vulnerable people nations must limit their ghg emissions
to levels that constitute their fair share of safe global emissions, and, (e) climate change is preventing some people from enjoying the most basic human rights including rights
to life and security among
others.
I definitely feel a caveat regarding «innovation in
future virtual delivery models» is warranted and that is, it should not
harm the client's rights
to be fairly and justly heard in any jurisdiction recognizing web - based or
other hybrid legal services.
Helping you
to deter the person or company that
harmed you or a loved one from doing the same
to others in the
future;
Those who file lawsuits are taking action
to hold negligent people liable for the
harm they cause, which is not only a form of seeking justice, but could also help
to mitigate injuries
to others in the
future.
If your child suffered birth trauma during delivery, or if they were
harmed by negligence in prenatal care, you may be able
to obtain financial compensation for medical expenses, current and
future therapeutic care, pain and suffering, and
other damages and losses associated with the inadequate standard of care provided
to your loved ones with the help of a Bardstown birth injury attorney.
These crime victims can sue for damages that can cover not only items related
to their physical injuries (medical expenses, long term care in the
future, etc.) but also for their financial damages (lost wages, lost
future earning capacity, etc.) as well as
other harm they have suffered (e.g., pain and suffering).
They also argue that forcing the women into arbitration would likewise force all
others who might have similar claims in the
future to go through arbitration, greatly
harming their ability
to protect their rights.
Nova Scotia now has two specialty courts — mental health and domestic violence — and a court - monitored drug treatment program, which all provide access
to supports and services
to make offenders less likely
to harm others and themselves in
future.
The Law Society has issued guidance
to assist solicitors with the conflict that can occur between a client's right
to consult a solicitor in confidence and the public interest in preventing
future acts that could result in serious
harm to others.
There are also worthwhile ideas about
future and contingent
harms in
other consumer protection areas as well as medical malpractice and pollution cases, just
to name a few.
The court is guided by the best interests of the child, and considers: the relationship of the child with each parent and the ability and disposition of each parent
to provide the child with love, affection and guidance, the ability and disposition of each parent
to assure that the child receives adequate food, clothing, medical care,
other material needs and a safe environment, the ability and disposition of each parent
to meet the child's present and
future developmental needs, the quality of the child's adjustment
to the child's present housing, school and community and the potential effect of any change, the ability and disposition of each parent
to foster a positive relationship and frequent and continuing contact with the
other parent, including physical contact, except where contact will result in
harm to the child or
to a parent, the quality of the child's relationship with the primary care provider, if appropriate given the child's age and development, the relationship of the child with any
other person who may significantly affect the child, the ability and disposition of the parents
to communicate, cooperate with each
other and make joint decisions concerning the children where parental rights and responsibilities are
to be shared or divided, and any evidence of abuse.
We're not exactly sure why (we didn't have strong predictions about gender), but it could be because women are traditionally more sensitive
to moral violations that could involve causing
harm to others (women typically score higher on empathy), 5 and that women are more sensitive
to disgusting things, 6 which would include sexual norm violations.7 We suggest that
future research further investigate gender differences in moral reasoning.
Excessive drinking in adolescence can cause substantial
harm to individuals and is associated with
future alcohol - related problems.1 — 3 Drinking in adolescence is particularly risky because it is much more likely
to be heavy and episodic (binge).4, 5 Excessive drinking during adolescence, while the brain is still developing, can be a major cause of trauma, physical injuries, hospitalisation, prolonged disability and premature death.1 — 3, 6 Alcohol contributes substantially
to motor vehicle collisions, homicides, suicide, assault, sexual risk - taking and many
other problems in Canada and the USA.7 — 16
Regulation 4 amends paragraph 1 of the Schedule
to the 2005 Regulations (matters in respect of the child) by requiring the report
to deal with any
harm which the child has suffered and any risk of
future harm to the child posed by their parents, relatives or any
other person considered relevant, for example a partner of the parent.
We believe investigating the effects of internet - delivered treatments are particularly relevant for rural populations, 27 as these communities typically struggle
to access counselling opportunities, 28 and the rates of problematic gambling are sometimes higher for rural persons than the Albertan average.2 Furthermore, given that most telemedicine applications in Alberta are focused on delivering training or non-clinical services, 28 and that the government of Alberta may legalise on - line gambling in the near
future, gambling
harm and treatment need are likely
to increase for rural and remote Albertans.29 Also, as gambling and the internet are ubiquitous phenomena in western countries, this study may be relevant
to other rural and remote jurisdictions.