It campaigned, and won, on
future immigration controls.
Not exact matches
It was a desire for the UK Parliament to have the final say over Britain's fiscal and economic
future, Britain's policies on
immigration, and
control over business practices in this country.
A
future that sees us take back
control of the things that matter to us — things like our national borders and
immigration policy, and the way we decide and interpret our own laws - so that we are able to shape a better, more prosperous
future for the working men and women of Britain.
[100] Miliband subsequently unveiled five pledges at a rally in Birmingham which would form the focus of a
future Labour government, specifically identifying policies on deficit reduction, living standards, the NHS,
immigration controls and tuition fees.
He predicted border
controls and
immigration will become central to the
future EU debate in the UK, and claimed a «political earthquake» was coming.
I want instead to pose a question: namely, which discussion's more important to the
future of conservative measures - the repatriation of powers, tax cuts,
immigration control, welfare reform, free schools, that sort of thing?
Ultimately, in an impasse, each side fears losing something: In disputes over Gun
Control, it is losing more innocent lives vs. losing personal safety and protection; in disputes over Immigration Reform, it is losing talented people and necessary social contributions of immigrants vs. losing potential American jobs; in disputes over the Debt Ceiling / Fiscal Cliff, it is losing on - going social programs vs. losing tax money to excessive interest payments; and, in disputes over Certification for Mediators, it is losing quality control for consumers vs. losing personal / professional autonomy to future regu
Control, it is losing more innocent lives vs. losing personal safety and protection; in disputes over
Immigration Reform, it is losing talented people and necessary social contributions of immigrants vs. losing potential American jobs; in disputes over the Debt Ceiling / Fiscal Cliff, it is losing on - going social programs vs. losing tax money to excessive interest payments; and, in disputes over Certification for Mediators, it is losing quality
control for consumers vs. losing personal / professional autonomy to future regu
control for consumers vs. losing personal / professional autonomy to
future regulators.