Specifically, between 10 - 15 law schools are responsible socializing a significant percentage of
the future legal academics.
Not exact matches
The Young
Legal Aid Lawyers response to the Bar Standards Board Consultation on the
Future of Training for the Bar:
Academic, Vocational and Professional Stages of Training is available to download below.
Consumers of
legal information undoubtedly have many other topics regarding both past practices and
future expectations to suggest to
academics.
Andreozzi somewhat provocatively suggested that the
future of
legal technology may lie somewhere in the middle between his self - described non-visionary focus on law practice and Wilens» more
academic focus on technology.
As technology is increasingly used within law practices to streamline
legal processes and more efficiently deliver services to clients, an important question has arisen within
legal professional and
academic circles: Do lawyers and law students have the technical skills to meet the needs of
future legal jobs?
Hosted by the Stanford Center for
Legal Informatics, CodeX FutureLaw brings together academics, entrepreneurs, legal hackers, policy makers, and others to discuss the future of
Legal Informatics, CodeX FutureLaw brings together
academics, entrepreneurs,
legal hackers, policy makers, and others to discuss the future of
legal hackers, policy makers, and others to discuss the
future of law.
If Elsevier's and ACS» suits had little to do with the recovery lost revenue, it might seem as if their
legal strategy is about reminding the
academic community that such publishers own the better part of this body of knowledge and, as such, have a
legal right to determine the financing of access to it now and into that uncertain
future.
SMU will be SAL's
academic partner for issues relating to
legal innovation and the
future business of law.
At a moment at which there are many serious criticisms of liberalism and / or questions about its
future, combined with substantial unanimity among
legal academics about various progressive values (as seen, to be clear, through an establishment lens) and the routine invocation in current scholarly and public writing of things like «rule of law,» faith in judicial review, and so on, there is a lot of room for interesting and valuable work questioning those assumptions and premises.
FLIP, which was first announced last July by Chief Justice Sundaresh Menon, aims to bring together lawyers, technopreneurs, investors,
academics and regulators, in an initiative that will support the development of the delivery of
legal services in the
future economy.
But I would urge you to give it deep and serious consideration — if you happen to be a
legal academic or someone with access to a
legal journal, you might want to take it on as a foundational question for the
future development of
legal services.
I have been frustrated for years by the dis - connected and siloed character of
future - oriented conversations among both
academic lawyers and
legal professionals.
These, of course, include chairs, vice-chairs and members of judicial tribunals (or, to use the more common terminology, adjudicative tribunals); chairs and members of regulatory agencies; members of the bureaucracy; politicians; lawyers, paralegals, and community
legal workers with experience in acting for users of the system;
academics in the fields of both law and political science; students in either of those fields; and, of course, individuals and business that have experienced the system as «parties» before particular tribunals, or who can anticipate that role in the
future.
This experience allows me to approach this discussion not only from the perspective of a lawyer and consultant who has an interest in the
future of the
legal profession, but also from the point of view of an
academic.
What is the
future of
legal academic publishing in Canada?
On Sept. 27, some 40
legal academics and law - book publishers gathered in Seattle for a workshop on the
future of the
legal course book.