Given our current and
future need for fossil fuels, there's plenty of money for suppliers.
Not exact matches
RD&D on carbon capture and storage (CCS) technology is
needed, especially given our conclusion that the current atmospheric CO2 level is already in the dangerous zone, but continuing issues with CCS technology [7], [244] make it inappropriate to construct
fossil fuel power plants with a promise of
future retrofit
for carbon capture.
It is vital in sustainability education to give space
for learners to develop their own visions
for a sustainable
future whilst reminding participants about the issues underpinning the
need for change — climate change, peak oil, global inequity and the financial cost of
fossil fuels.
The solution to a sustainable
future will always be walking a tightrope between a
need for population control & free markets until geothermal strategies
for base load power transplants
fossil fuels and indeed until better water availability and a host of other finite resources become magically available.
The oil and gas industry is going all out to paint gas as green and keep us hooked on
fossil fuels, but the truth is there is absolutely no room
for gas in the transition we
need to a clean energy
future.
We're endorsing candidates up and down the ballot who are willing to fight
for the
fossil free
future we
need by supporting a rapid, just transition to 100 % renewable energy and opposing any new climate - wrecking
fossil fuel projects — and who also share a broad, progressive vision
for a just world where all of our communities can thrive.
All three spell doom
for the
future of humanity on this planet, but there is good news, we don't
need any
fossil fuels.
This has always been the only serious risk and what must be avoided if the US and the developed world is to have a prosperous
future that will allow humans to have access to the
fossil fuel - generated energy
needed for continued economic progress and improved human welfare and if plants are to not to lose partial access to one of their basic nutrients (assumming CO2 emissions reductions have any real effects on atmospheric CO2 levels).
According to IRENA's analysis, the risk of stranded assets is highest
for the building sector: in its assessment of stranded assets, IRENA includes the construction value that would be lost due to the
needed future renovation of building stock to avoid it relying on
fossil fuels.
Regardless of our
future national energy strategy (
fossil fuels (oil, coal) versus renewable energy (solar, wind, biofuels, tidal, etc.)-RRB-, there will still exist the
need to feed the ever - growing population (N2O released thru fertilizer use), refrigerate food
for storage (leakage and release of the refrigerant, HFCs), and distribute electrical power (dielectric gases used like SF6).
RD&D on carbon capture and storage (CCS) technology is
needed, especially given our conclusion that the current atmospheric CO2 level is already in the dangerous zone, but continuing issues with CCS technology [7], [244] make it inappropriate to construct
fossil fuel power plants with a promise of
future retrofit
for carbon capture.
Yet
fossil fuels, especially coal, will remain a significant source of energy to meet human
needs for the foreseeable
future.
Exploring the Transition to a Sustainable
Future on a Finite Planet To prosper
for very much longer on the changing Earth humankind will
need to move beyond its current
fossil -
fueled civilization toward one that is sustained on recycled materials and renewable energy.
Such information is
needed to assess the implications
for future fossil fuel use.
These articles paint oil and gas as the only reliable energy source
for the
future, describe the
need to expand
fossil fuel reserves, and ignore the possibility of a carbon - restricted
future.
Instead, Europe
needs to leave
fossil fuels in the ground, and promote greater energy efficiency and community - owned renewables — to deliver a more secure
future for us all.»
Lest you have doubts that renewable energy won't be able to take over from
fossil fuels: A new report from NRDC looks at
future energy usage in Michigan and comes to the conclusion that through a combination of renewable energy and energy efficiency improvements, the state can easily meet
future power
needs: Energy Efficiency Could Save State $ 3 Billion by 2030 The report, A Green Energy Alternative
for Michigan, was written by Synapse Energy Economic
for NRDC and shows that simply making energy efficiency improvements to offset
fossil fuel usage the state could save $ 3 billion over the next 20 years.
She's a champion
for climate change solutions that create good, family - supporting jobs, and she supports bold action to stop dangerous and dirty
fossil fuel pipelines and move us toward the 100 % renewable energy - powered
future that Iowa and the planet
need.
And yet, despite a long history of scientific warnings (please see Footnote 30
for a detailed description30), the many current ecological and economic impacts and crises, the
future risks and dangers, the large number of international meetings and conferences on the urgent
need for climate policies and measures, and the adoption of some national and regional climate policies, growth in global CO2 emissions from
fossil fuels and cement has not only remained strong but is actually accelerating.
In order to appropriately plan
for our
future energy
needs, a new detailed model of
fossil fuel supply is required.
Investment
needs to start matching the lower levels of demand
for fossil fuels that are required to align with a low carbon
future,» said Mark Campanale, founder and executive director at the Carbon Tracker Initiative.