Soon and his colleagues said the report's authors used flawed methods to project
future polar bear populations.
The researchers also examined 92 recent scientific papers that addressed the evidence for sea ice loss and its impact on
future polar bear populations.
Not exact matches
The team hopes
future research will clarify the impacts of grizzly
bear aggression on the
polar bear population.
I do not want to draw any conclusions as to the threat to the
polar bear populations posed by the ongoing environmental changes /
future warming of the Arctic.
Tagged Amstrup, average global temperature, Bayesian models, BBC, climate change, Derocher, extinct,
future climate,
future population decline, global warming,
polar bear, sea ice declines, sea ice models
Tagged Beaufort Sea, climate change, Derocher, Eastern Beaufort, extinction, feeding,
future, global warming, IUCN
Polar Bear Specialist Group, models, Pilfold, polar bear, population, predation, predictions, Red list, ringed seals, Southern Beaufort, Stirling, thick spring ice, threat
Bear Specialist Group, models, Pilfold,
polar bear, population, predation, predictions, Red list, ringed seals, Southern Beaufort, Stirling, thick spring ice, threat
bear,
population, predation, predictions, Red list, ringed seals, Southern Beaufort, Stirling, thick spring ice, threatened
«There's no point bleating about the
future of pandas,
polar bears and tigers when we're not addressing the one single factor that's putting more pressure on the ecosystem than any other — namely the ever - increasing size of the world's
population.
The fact that «There are thousands of healthy
polar bears prowling the Arctic at this moment» does not diminish the threat to the
polar bear population due to global warming now, or in the
future.
That paper, which was not peer - reviewed, argued that because
polar bear numbers have remained relatively stable despite faster - than - expected sea ice loss over the past decade, scientists» predictions of
future population declines are flawed.
Secretary Salazar has so far defended the Bush - era «threatened» designation, claiming that threats to the species are only of concern in the
future — notwithstanding the fact that
polar bears are already drowning and starving as a result of sea - ice loss, with many
populations declining.