Not exact matches
The reality of past events is partially preserved as newly synthesized elements in later events but fully and infallibly in the never - failing memory of God.51 Hartshorne explains further that a denial of the full reality of the past would entail the conclusion that no true statements could be made about the determinate character of past events («Lincoln was assassinated»), whereas acceptance of his doctrine of the nonactuality of the
future entails the falsity of all statements that ascribe completely determinate character to
future events.52 «
Maybe» is the only correct mode of
reference to the
future.
They elicit sub-psychological conservative reactions — revulsion, shame, and
maybe the fear that somewhere a sick - o is watching the same movie and taking notes for
future reference.
I have seen no
references to the situation in the USA (other than California, which has started a «nuclear - free
future» dialog)--
maybe some bloggers here can comment on the chances of major nuclear expansion in the US today.
New York Times reporter Steve Lohr published an article on March 24th entitled «Big Data is Opening Doors, But
Maybe Too Many» which raised issues about Big Data and privacy, invoking the ever - terrifying Big Brother
reference from Orwell's
future - horror novel 1984.
Maybe it is the fresh air or beautiful view around me (the picture was taken just now as I write this article), but the concept of a higher standard came to me as I read some passages from a book that
references Gandhi, and no I will not be changing my clothes to hand spun cloth in the near
future, but I love the idea of living a single standard in life.