Not exact matches
We allow that short - term interest rates may be pegged well below historical norms for several more years, and we know that for every year that short - term interest rates are held at zero (rather than a historically normal level of 4 %), one can «justify» equity
valuations about 4 % above historical norms — a
premium that removes that same 4 % from prospective
future stock returns.
... formal asset
valuation models (extrapolations of historical return data) provide the most (least) predictive estimates of the
future equity risk
premium.
Both trade at
premium valuations, reflections of their strength today and also their potential in the
future.
I've observed this before, and it's essential to repeat it again: if interest rates are lower because likely
future growth in deliverable cash flows is also lower, then no
valuation premium is justified at all.
When everyone believes in the inevitability of stocks, à la «Dow 36,000» (we'll get there by 2025 or so), equity
valuations are high, past equity performance has probably been great, and the
future equity
premium is small — think 1929, 1972, August 1987 and February 2000.
We allow that short - term interest rates may be pegged well below historical norms for several more years, and we know that for every year that short - term interest rates are held at zero (rather than a historically normal level of 4 %), one can «justify» equity
valuations about 4 % above historical norms — a
premium that removes that same 4 % from prospective
future stock returns.
The obvious problem is they're generally priced accordingly — their additional
valuation premium reflecting the (perceived) consistency & sustainability of
future excess profits.