Sentences with phrase «game breaking issues»

They can cause game breaking issues and depending on the game and if you planned to upgrade to a newer version it can be torture to get a game running correctly on the new version without a lot of work.
@ radler, Tell me how was ign's little big planet review fair?Assassins Creed Unity had a shit tin of game breaking issues and it got a 7, Halo MCC still has so many bugs / issues and it got a 9 then why did they give LBP a low score because of the bugs?Does that sound fair to you?
I did not encounter any game breaking issues and as the game currently stands, it feels solid.
They're feeling that the effort should rather be put into fixing the current content before trying to sell them new content, or at least offer the new content as free to make up for all the game breaking issues that still exist today.
It doesn't have the game breaking issues that BF4 has.
I really tried to like it, I really did, but there is so many game breaking issues in it (from cheap bosses, confusing levels and 3D perspective gone wrong) that as soon as I tried warming up to it, i'd have to put it aside in frustration.

Not exact matches

There's likely to be lots of talk about virtual reality, augmented reality, video games, and, of course, data security — an issue that Facebook has been tangled up in since news broke of the Cambridge Analytica scandal.
Guns should not be a scapegoat, but maybe if we keep guns around, we can shoot the scapegoat and deal with the real issues that cause violence, issues such as broken families, class warfare, racism, drug and alcohol addictions, violence in movies and video games, and moral issues such as envy, jealousy, greed, and rage.
To rectify this issue we analyzed our pick performance over the past six months to determine the break - even points for bettors — i.e. how much money should be bet on each game to justify a subscription?
That's usually not an issue for bowl games, since most take place during winter break, but since the championship game is so late, it could become a problem in the future.
Time for some brutal honesty... this team, as it stands, is in no better position to compete next season than they were 12 months ago, minus the fact that some fans have been easily snowed by the acquisition of Lacazette, the free transfer LB and the release of Sanogo... if you look at the facts carefully you will see a team that still has far more questions than answers... to better show what I mean by this statement I will briefly discuss the current state of affairs on a position - by - position basis... in goal we have 4 potential candidates, but in reality we have only 1 option with any real future and somehow he's the only one we have actively tried to get rid of for years because he and his father were a little too involved on social media and he got caught smoking (funny how people still defend Wiltshire under the same and far worse circumstances)... you would think we would want to keep any goaltender that Juventus had interest in, as they seem to have a pretty good history when it comes to that position... as far as the defenders on our current roster there are only a few individuals whom have the skill and / or youth worthy of our time and / or investment, as such we should get rid of anyone who doesn't meet those simple requirements, which means we should get rid of DeBouchy, Gibbs, Gabriel, Mertz and loan out Chambers to see if last seasons foray with Middlesborough was an anomaly or a prediction of things to come... some fans have lamented wildly about the return of Mertz to the starting lineup due to his FA Cup performance but these sort of pie in the sky meanderings are indicative of what's wrong with this club and it's wishy - washy fan - base... in addition to these moves the club should aggressively pursue the acquisition of dominant and mobile CB to stabilize an all too fragile defensive group that has self - destructed on numerous occasions over the past 5 seasons... moving forward and building on our need to re-establish our once dominant presence throughout the middle of the park we need to target a CDM then do whatever it takes to get that player into the fold without any of the usual nickel and diming we have become famous for (this kind of ruthless haggling has cost us numerous special players and certainly can't help make the player in question feel good about the way their future potential employer feels about them)... in order for us to become dominant again we need to be strong up the middle again from Goalkeeper to CB to DM to ACM to striker, like we did in our most glorious years before and during Wenger's reign... with this in mind, if we want Ozil to be that dominant attacking midfielder we can't keep leaving him exposed to constant ridicule about his lack of defensive prowess and provide him with the proper players in the final third... he was never a good defensive player in Real or with the German National squad and they certainly didn't suffer as a result of his presence on the pitch... as for the rest of the midfield the blame falls squarely in the hands of Wenger and Gazidis, the fact that Ramsey, Ox, Sanchez and even Ozil were allowed to regularly start when none of the aforementioned had more than a year left under contract is criminal for a club of this size and financial might... the fact that we could find money for Walcott and Xhaka, who weren't even guaranteed starters, means that our whole business model needs a complete overhaul... for me it's time to get rid of some serious deadweight, even if it means selling them below what you believe their market value is just to simply right this ship and change the stagnant culture that currently exists... this means saying goodbye to Wiltshire, Elneny, Carzola, Walcott and Ramsey... everyone, minus Elneny, have spent just as much time on the training table as on the field of play, which would be manageable if they weren't so inconsistent from a performance standpoint (excluding Carzola, who is like the recent version of Rosicky — too bad, both will be deeply missed)... in their places we need to bring in some proven performers with no history of injuries... up front, although I do like the possibilities that a player like Lacazette presents, the fact that we had to wait so many years to acquire some true quality at the striker position falls once again squarely at the feet of Wenger... this issue highlights the ultimate scam being perpetrated by this club since the arrival of Kroenke: pretend your a small market club when it comes to making purchases but milk your fans like a big market club when it comes to ticket prices and merchandising... I believe the reason why Wenger hasn't pursued someone of Henry's quality, minus a fairly inexpensive RVP, was that he knew that they would demand players of a similar ilk to be brought on board and that wasn't possible when the business model was that of a «selling» club... does it really make sense that we could only make a cheeky bid for Suarez, or that we couldn't get Higuain over the line when he was being offered up for half the price he eventually went to Juve for, or that we've only paid any interest to strikers who were clearly not going to press their current teams to let them go to Arsenal like Benzema or Cavani... just part of the facade that finally came crashing down when Sanchez finally called their bluff... the fact remains that no one wants to win more than Sanchez, including Wenger, and although I don't agree with everything that he has done off the field, I would much rather have Alexis front and center than a manager who has clearly bought into the Kroenke model in large part due to the fact that his enormous ego suggests that only he could accomplish great things without breaking the bank... unfortunately that isn't possible anymore as the game has changed quite dramatically in the last 15 years, which has left a largely complacent and complicit Wenger on the outside looking in... so don't blame those players who demanded more and were left wanting... don't blame those fans who have tried desperately to raise awareness for several years when cracks began to appear... place the blame at the feet of those who were well aware all along of the potential pitfalls of just such a plan but continued to follow it even when it was no longer a financial necessity, like it ever really was...
My issue is that we are offering a nice juicy contract to a player who, since his break out season in 2010/11 when he played 35 PL games, has only managed 20 PL games for Arsenal in two of the last 7 seasons (He is on 17 apps this season with 8 games to play, but knee injury).
Above all, Madrid «broke» football because they solved an issue that is at the very heart of the game.
Fauci and CDC's Principal Deputy Director Anne Schuchat tried to allay concerns about other issues, including travel to affected regions during spring break, the 2016 Olympics games in Brazil, the discovery of Zika virus in saliva and urine, and the prospect of quarantining infected people.
Quantum Break is a great game on Xbone, but shoddy PC optimisation and the issues associated with the Win 10 store fundamentally break the Break is a great game on Xbone, but shoddy PC optimisation and the issues associated with the Win 10 store fundamentally break the break the game.
This game is seriously flawed on the PS3, sound clipping, frame rate issues and a bunch of game breaking bugs.
TTG released a totally broken product (Disc on 4 GB slim doesn't work * at all *, signifigant, game - breaking issues on every other version.
Graphics are top notch, some framerate issues but nothing game breaking.
If you're dead against modding the game, be prepared for some serious issues; no 1 being sensors and distance tools being effectively broken!
With that said, finding players is not an issue and the game supports traditional multiplayer modes which does give you a break from the main story.
Bethesda has not treated this game well considering it is there trademark series, they tried to update the game to fix the texture issues among other bugs instead however they did NOT fix the issues and broke resistances to everything which is a key mechanic, also they have not given any word as to when they will fix the texture issues which means it most likely will not get fixed in a long time by which I most likely will have put it on the shelf forgetting about it.
The game has some technical issues, but far less and far less game - breaking than something like Skyrim.
It's not a bad game by any means, and it's certainly still beatable with perseverance and quick reflexes, so it's not a game - breaking issue.
He took a break recently for health - related issues, but was currently working on the upcoming PlayStation 4 game Deep Down.
To them, HZD was superior in every possible way to, let's pick the most obvious example possible, Zelda BoTW, yet, HZD is still struggling to fix game breaking / progression break issues with each of their patch and even adding features which were already present in Zelda on launch (picture modes).
Much has been written about Andromeda's sorry technical state, and it's no exaggeration to say that this is one of the buggiest and broken high - profile games released in the past several years, with an impressive laundry list of issues, from broken quests to disembodied heads appearing in scenes, from characters randomly spawning into other characters to dialogue that has no relation to the situation.
I didn't encounter frame rate issues myself but the save game mechanic, as well as Old Homeless Homer's broken promises were getting on my nerves.
In the months following launch, a worrying number of issues were flagged by users, some of which broke the game completely and even corrupted save data.
On the one hand, it's a transparently broken game riddled with bugs, glitches, frame - rate issues, and optimisation problems.
In the end, these issues are disappointing but not game - breaking.
Other than to fix quite a number of bugs and other performance issues found within the game, this update is primarily here to add the necessary data to pave the way for tomorrow's release of «Operation Broken Eagle» DLC episode.
Despite therefore the game being 99.9 per cent complete, the remaining 0.1 per cent attending to small issues and bugs has been tricky to anticipate.We're absolutely dedicated to delivering a ground - breaking experience and by targeting mid-May fans can be assured that's what they'll receive.Again, we want to thank our fans for their support and patience on this matter.
The noteworthy flaw is the obtrusive balance issues are prevalent; my experiences in this regard have not been «game - breaking».
Criterion is not settling for a broken game, no matter what bugs are screwing it up, which is why the Burnout - developer is already issuing a second patch (here's the first one) for Need for Speed: Hot Pursuit on PC to further clear the game from graphical inaccuracies and crashes.
A game being delayed to be improved upon is always a better alternative to releasing a broken game with performance issues and such.
One thing to point out, I have read a few reviews and some people on the Xbox version have mentioned a save bug and control issues — I never had any of these on the PS4, I was on the Pro, as my saves worked fine — it never crashed and the control mechanism for the robot and aiming is a bit fiddly (no free aim, locked to eight directional aiming) and it does glitch out if you aim too close to an object but it never broke the game or caused an un-fair death.
In a year when high - profile titles such as Assassin's Creed Unity, Halo: The Master Chief Collection and Driveclub came stumbling out of the gate with game - breaking issues, Nintendo churned out hits like Mario Kart 8, Super Smash Bros. and Captain Toad: Treasure Tracker, all of which exuded the level of painstaking polish that the brand is known for.
Regarding definitions, I'd call a game an alpha when there's a fully playable vertical slice of the core gameplay but it still has missing features and content, there may be game - breaking issues, and the core gameplay may even change based on feedback.
The only real issue with the game is that it suffers from a number of bugs that really break the experience.
It is not breaking news anymore to say that the Xbox port is in an embarrassing state, nearly unplayable at certain points with heavy lag issues, constant crashes, and the game struggling to keep up at 30 fps.
Are any of these issues game breaking?
If the game you bought is completely broken, EA's multiplayer servers melt down or you fall victim to any other technical issue within EA's domain, the publisher will extend the request window to 72 hours after you first launched the game.
These issues aren't prevalent enough to be game breaking most of the time, but it would certainly be nice to see them fixed in next year's version.
Additionally, I did run into a few minor technical issues, but nothing particularly game breaking.
This becomes pretty off - putting at first, though this issue is not game breaking.
The worst issues were the game - breaking bugs that crashed my game and forced me to restart my entire adventure.
While the story doesn't break any new ground, and there are some issues with the initial experience distribution being uneven, Grand Kingdom is a worthy strategy title aimed at anyone who has played strategy games such as Fire Emblem.
Being in pre-alpha you can expect a fair amount of bugs and issues with the game, but having played the game for 30 hours I can say that the common bugs in game are far from game breaking.
My issue with this game is that all the promises made, were broken.
After an initial attempted launch of Marvel Heroes patch 1.11 on Friday that saw the game break and forced the team at Gazillion to issue another patch that reverted the game to a pre - 1.11 state, the 1.11 patch is now live and has some goodies for fans of the Marvel Universe and action - MMO - RPG's.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z