Sentences with phrase «game for what»

I was definitely not expecting it look better as this is a goddamn handheld were talking about, I got past the slight framerate hiccups and am enjoying the game for what it is having not played the game previously, its great experiencing it for the first time on the Vita and I am actually quite blown away that they are managing to fit all of these full console ports of games onto the handheld, something too many people don't seem to appreciate like myself.

Too often I have loved a game for what it was (or what it wasn't) only to be let down by it's sequel.

It's also a freemium game for what it's worth.

The game has been on the table for a while now, but there has been very little on the game for what feels like years.

Nonetheless, I'm clearly not alone in seeing this game for what it is — a desperate attempt at relevance by a company that tried to fix what wasn't broken.

I appreciate this game for what it is: an art form.

That doesn't mean I didn't enjoy the game for what it is, I just mostly skipped its story.

Sonic Unleashed is hated just for the night time levels, and that's not how you have to judge a game, I judge this game for what it is, not for what I want it to be.

It's amazing that modern day reviewers are respecting the game for what it is — tight gameplay — and not ripping too hard on what it is not — tons of content, upgrading, AAA graphics, etc..

People need to see this game for what it is.

Even the most jaded, skeptical gamer can enjoy this game for what it is, because for what it is and for what it tries to do it does so triumphantly and with no equal on any handheld on the market.

Mario Kart Wii was an alright game for what it is.

To the extent that it's possible, one has to put that aside and focus on the game for what it is rather than thinking about the rest of the series.

Therefore, if you enjoy exploring lands, then you'll enjoy the game for what it is.

Thankfully, local and online multiplayer should have you and another player enjoying the game for what it is.

This is advice for his son in desperate need of a worthy role model, a role that the Kratos we know is wholly unsuitable for, but also guidance for the player; if you loved the way that God of War played in the PS2 and PS3 incarnations of the franchise then this is going to take some getting used to, but you should take the game for what it is rather than how it's different to what came before.

I have enjoyed every Star Fox game for what they were, but if Nintendo feels like they can't evolve the series in a fantastic way then I would rather see it fade away only to be resurrected in 20 years as Fox makes his triumphant return in Super Smash Bros 7 then see it dragged through the mud.

The way I am able to milk the game for what it is worth, and the way I can head into a horde of enemies alone and just tackle them one by one, and the more I played it like this the more I realized that it is really the true way to head into this game, at least it is the most rewarding way.

I'll still try to see this game for what it is, much like I tried to do with Gears of War.

Destiny might not be quite the game that many people expected when Halo developer Bungie announced that they would be creating a loot - focused first - person shooter, but it has still managed to cultivate a dedicated fanbase who enjoy the game for what it is, rather than dismissing it for what it's not.

Counter-Strike has been a popular mass online shooter game for what seems like decades now.

I've been testing this game for what seems like weeks now.

Don't get me wrong though, I absolutely loved the game for what it was and even played through it all again a few years later, but at the time my expectations were sorely unmet, partly because it promised a revolutionary multiplayer experience that cost way too much to enjoy: an experience that I never got a chance to try out since I didn't have three other friends with Game Boy Advances and GBA Links to the GameCube.

While SF x MM isn't the best Mega Man game I've played (obviously) nor is it the worst, but I respect the game for what it is.

This game for what it seems doesn't have gimmick courses, only a stadium where you can change the type of ground, what is a shame but oh well.

Awesome review, you analyzed the game for what it is on the platform it is rather than taking the easy road and saying it's not as good as the home console version.

MGS is a ok game for what it is so i'm sure anyone who hasn't already played it will enjoy it.

I «am no fan of the series nor do I really care about the games, but I do care when a reviewer (especially from a site with influence) out - rightly pushes an agenda rather than seeing the game for what it is.

Actually, I have already seen one or two comments under the polygon and quarter to three reviews that believe that they are the only ones seeing the game for what it actually is.

Too me it appears clear that the reviewer saw the game for what it is and apparently thought it was «awful» hence the 3/10.

*** «What does make it a failure is if they were unable to capitalise on the changes to the point where simply meeting the status - quo would have been a better game... and quite frankly from the review it doesn't sound like that» *** *** «I «am no fan of the series nor do I really care about the games, but I do care when a reviewer (especially from a site with influence) out - rightly pushes an agenda rather than seeing the game for what it is.»

In all honesty, I'm enjoying the game for what it is and it was what I expected it to be.

Judging the game for what it is and not what «it could be» has allowed me to enjoy the game a lot.

I'm a fan of, and have written about, the Souls games before, so I'd like to take a moment this week to remember the game for what it was, and what

On paper, the option of shifting between Super Saiyan God Goku to Majin Buu and then to Bulma (pfft, Bulma...) seems fun, but considering it's been some years since Bandai Namco really nailed a Dragon Ball game for what it should be, I'm just not yet convinced.

I hated this game when it first came out, and I still do recognize that there are people that enjoy the game for what it is.

Accept the game for what it is — a grind to level up and improve your character and base — and there is fun to be had here.

When playing Conduit 2, it's difficult not to judge the game for what it is in the face of what it would have been with just a bit more bug testing.

While I applaud the game for what's its able to do from a design standpoint with the simple systems it has in place, I can't help but wonder how a more robust upgrade system would have affected the game.

Exactly, it's because too many people judge a game for what it is or having for, that is why majority of people don't even know what a definition is anymore.

On one hand, I thoroughly enjoyed the game for what it was, being a fan of similar combat systems fou...

While I'll admit that Fable always had its flaws, I always enjoyed each game for what they were and I do hope Microsoft intends to revive the series.

Its rough edges initially made me wary, but a number of engaging gameplay mechanics, very well implemented visual design and stories full of mystery and intrigue helped me get past any negative associations and see this game for what it truly is.

On one hand, I thoroughly enjoyed the game for what it was, being a fan of similar combat systems found in Kingdom Hearts, Star Ocean, and Dynasty Warriors.

While I would enjoy fighting players online, the lack of incentive for online play really hinders the player from enjoying the game for what it is — an online fighting game.

It's not quite that good, when I try to step away from those boyhood fantasies and analyse the game for what it is.

You had multiple people on staff working on this game for what feels like a long time.

Please enjoy this game for what it is and look forward to what we have coming next.»

Instead of accepting the game for what it is, your only defense is the sales?

People like jim sterling who actually reviewed the game for what it was were attacked via DDOS sony takes the most chances on IP's nintendo and xbox wouldn't even touch.