Sentences with phrase «game people pointed»

That game was the game people pointed to if anyone wanted to prove video games were an art form.

Not exact matches

Up to this point in the short history of VR, however, the most premium games have been limited to people with a lot of extra cash to burn.

She also points out that there are more than 1 billion people playing online games around the world.

He became so addicted to it that by high school he had assembled a team of about 40 people that quickly earned enough points to be the game's highest - ranking team in the world.

«We'd like to get back into game of printing guides at some point, I think people really like that and we'd love to start that again,» Stang told CNBC on Tuesday.

The gaming developer last revealed user numbers more than two years ago, at which point 67 million people were playing the game on a monthly basis.

Some people on the «Pokémon GO» subreddit pointed out these issues with Niantic awhile ago, highlighting similar communication issues around the company's previous game, called «Ingress.»

If you're one of the millions of people who left your childhood home, then returned at some point to find it feeling alien, «Night in the Woods» is a game you can relate to.

At this point, the Wii U's best hope for a solid 2015 are its older games: people are still playing Super Smash Bros. and Mario Kart 8, and these games are still helping Nintendo move consoles over a year after their respective releases.

Final point: Compare the net worth of Jack Bogle vs. any of the top 10 hedge fund managers in the world as we are comparing people at the top of the game.

B.C. has commenced a cat - and - mouse game with people with extremely deep pockets and access to very smart accountants and lawyers, a valid point the provincial NDP raised.

Once again people are pointing to video games after a school shooting, and even the White House is getting involved.

But if you are the kind of person who dreams of business and first class travel, or someone who occasionally has to book an expensive flight with little advanced notice, then it might be worth it for you to play the travel rewards game with frequent flyer miles and hotel points.

But, for a few people who are in the miles and points game, these once - in - a-lifetime experiences cost less than $ 1,500.

«When a single person breaks the rules of the game,» Havel writes, «thus exposing it as a game, everything suddenly appears in another light and the whole crust seems then to be made of a tissue on the point of tearing and disintegrating uncontrollably.»

Here is a link to a video that is a powerful speech its from an older movie called the dictator, very good movie by the way, Anyway Charlie chaplin plays the part of hitler and uses a very powerful and memorable speach about equality and the way life is moving,» https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WibmcsEGLKo» you have shown nothing but malice in these comments and you wonder why gay's are protrayed as the «bad guys» in video games and movies and if you don't believe that then watch this» https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XdmJXHJLZ6M» the point is I will respect the person who is silent, holding a flag that has ever color before i Can or Will ever respect someone like yourself.

It doesn't give points for characteristic absurdities like income inequality is okay if it yields the optimal number of trapeze artists or poor people will show up to work on time if their iPhones tell them that work is like a video game.

David Grossman, retired professor of psychology at West Point, says that these games provide a script for rehearsing the act of killing: «It is their job to condition and enable people to kill... [These games] teach a person how to look another person in the eye and snuff their life out.»

Have read many stories about children killing their parents sisters brother in the same way as in the game specially that ice hooky thing... killing people with to score points and sure drugs with such games are behind most crimes...

He will need to build up stamina — but he is a 20/10 center at 25 minutes a game — people seem to forget the win streak started with him playing and the Sixers building 30 point leads and allowing the bench to play most of the 4th quarters.

Texas is currently 66th nationally in scoring defense after allowing 31, 36, and 48 points in its last three games, which is a stat that might be important to some people, I guess, maybe.

«I can understand that [people think the negativity will return] but overall I believe there were a lot of positives in the game as well because we created many chances, we had great domination and unfortunately we dropped three points.»

Here is the point Gooners, if we can turn in such a one sided game as that with Giroud being below par and with Alexis Sanchez on a beach somewhere, people will have taken notice.

I am off bashing and criticizing Ozil in recent weeks as I don't see the point, I have been highlighting the massive flaws in his game that are making him look out of place in the EPL but people will keep sweeping them under the carpet but will highlight Girouds, Arteta's, Wilshere's, Cazorla's, Ramsey's, Sanogo's, Walcott, Mert... and the list goes on..

The German spoke about proving people wrong and seizing the opportunity that is left for Arsenal this season, by taking the full 15 points still available from the final five games.

We only took two Premier League points and people were saying that our title challenge was faltering but then we stormed back with three wins in a row and five of the next six, including the big game against title rivals Man City.

I'm getting annoyed that people fail to notice the positive he did recently (he started spending money, keep the team in tact, getting a new physio in, try to win game ugly when result is getting bad) while it is very fair points that he made very wrong judgement in not getting enough defensive cover, and his players are naive at time in term of tactics.

Sorry but people keep on saying new players yet I have seen many games this season, including yesterday, where the AFC team was superior yet did not take 3 points.

One of the last plays of the Game Team Schwartz connected near the goal - line for a reception, that was called a TD but from most people's point - of - view, it did not seem that way..

After the Palace game I said we were lucky but then people on here came out with some funny comments, «It's all about the 3 points.

Well last 2 games we got the results and not the football, the 2 before that it was the opposite, people were complaining about dropping points to Hull.

Funny thing how people after three rather lucky wins in a row completely bash people (like me for instance) who see through the shallow results and actually point out the huge problems with the club, that hasnt gone away just because the team somehow won three games in a row.

Ppl on this site like complain, if we eventually win dis game, what will be their point, coach knows the best, is with the players in training, we r fans not coach, best of luck Arsenal!

I figure the game is to genuinely take it all in, at some point arrive at a more informed view, stay away from hating people that didn't land on your end or do it your way, and keep an interest in where other people are coming from if you're still bothering to communicate with them.

Kane appears to be a strong - minded person who won't be easily shaken, but a blip of ten plus games without a goal will come at some point.

It's easy to paint a road map to the league's demise — let's say, a critical mass of players leaves the sport because of health concerns, fans likewise lose interest in a sport they know is ruining men, and the game itself becomes a terrible slog to watch — but the end point may be several decades from now, well after the people who could have acted have sold out or died.

For years people were crying out for midfielders with «steel» like Vieira and old school types and then our new signing cops a few reds in games we scraped through and haven't dropped points and you're calling for drastic measures?

Also you are saying that a defense that didn't seem to give up any points the second half of multiple games and were nowhere near as bad as a lot of people on here like to make out is zero help?

People may point to berbatov or tevez but at that time both were top of their game.

Even when Sanogo doesn't score he is better, we start defending from up top when he is on and attack is more fluid; I know ppl will point to d palace game but they sat very deep not affording him any space and Giroud wasn't exactly better when he came on.

«When people look at our scores, they might think we are some kind of run - and - gun type of offense,» Richards said of Antelope's average of 65.4 points per game before the section final.

For example 4 -3-3 concentrate less on playing in the centre and attempting to dominate it as it's contest Arsenal will win and take advantage of the fact that the full backs haven't got pace, which normally means the defensive midfielders or center backs often end up doubling up on the wingers... thus clearing a space in the middle and allowing people like Ozil and Giroud to play to the strong points of their game.

Their confidence could be low but this is a game for them when people aren't expecting three points, I wouldn't say it's a bonus match for them, but their fans might be happy once the performance doesn't stink.

We have a tougher game than people think today, so let's start the new year of well and get all three points whilst playing good football and then focus on the next game.

After the Gunners could only salvage a point with a late Kieran Gibbs goal some people will point to the good chances missed by Olivier Giroud or the fact that Alexis Sanchez was jaded and unable to influence the game, or the ease with which our makeshift and not fully match fit defence allowed the visitors to score the opening goal.

You people have protected and show loyality to Ramsey for many years besides him costing us many times valuable points and now bec of one game you go crazy about Seza.

In jacks case it was close to a season, and in truth i felt he jeopardize arsenal points standing in the games he was involve in where people who were fitter and game ready were left on the bench to accommodate his chance to make the Euro squad.

People come destroying me for saying the manager should go after we win a game, or if I try to point out a mistake we make.

But when you claim Mitchell is «beasting» and people point out that the game he just had wouldn't fall into that category and provides evidence to back it up, you respond by saying people are in denial, they don't give him credit, and they should «foh».

IMMANUEL KEYS TO VICTORY: Junior Nate Kendricks (20.8 points per game) and senior Darrin Person, Jr. (20 ppg) have scored 57.7 percent of Immanuel's total points on the season and there's no reason to expect that to change when the stakes are the highest.