Sentences with phrase «game reviewers did»

Well, for some reason, many game reviewers didn't enjoy Mario Sports Superstars and it went by mostly unnoticed when it first released.

Not exact matches

By giving Gears of War 3 such a high average score, reviewers are setting the bar low for what a great game should be and are doing a disservice to an industry that is struggling to be taken seriously by the mainstream.

what most reviewer don't tell is that chasing aurora is a really really fun local multiplayer game.

Most of the reviewers didn't play this game for long.

The negative reviewer clearly doesn't have the smarts to customize the game - which is why I give this a 10.

This reviewer couldn't help thinking of the realization brought back by recent family games of Monopoly: the oversold «fun» sure does tend to drag.

Reviewers as a group find the HD graphics equal to those of the PS3 and Xbox 360, but don't expect visuals superior to those competitors; as Ars Technica writes, «If the Wii U is capable of generating graphics more detailed than those of other current systems, the launch games I've seen so far don't do a great job showing that off.»

Don't belelive in hype and don't belelive in what all of those so called game reviewers say.

Just ignore reviewers, who does not buy the game and judge after few minutes playing at friends.

Then all of a sudden, kids don't want to say they don't like it, because their friends will tell them «git gud», and game reviewers who typically play all games at easy don't want to say those games suck to not lose their «reputation» as gamers (that is, unless they are bribed).

Don't listen to the reviewers, this is a great game.

While I didn't hate this game as much as some of the reviewers did (I think IGN's 1.5 may be a little harsh), it is definitely far from a good game.

DO NOT listen to what the reviewers have to say about this game.

This is an interesting game for the fact that Bethesda did not send out any pre-release copies to reviewers, instead mailing them to coincide with the retail sales date.

Basically, without going into too much detail, many reviewers criticised this turn - based strategy game for not being able to tell what the enemy will do considering they move at the exact same time as you.

Reviewer Jay even said that the game's massive Foundation Update didn't fix things.

If you don't remember, ONM recently put out the first Mario Party 9 Review, and reviewer Chris Scullion had some time to share his experience with game.

Definitely seems like one of those games where most reviewers didn't put the effort in to actually learn the intricacies of its gameplay so they complain about difficulty spikes, etc..

I'm not a huge frame rate sort of reviewer, as I honestly don't give two - shits about if a game is 30 / 60 fps (as long as it isn't 15 - 25 fps, we're golden), but seeing it all in motion certainly makes D2 look and play more fluidly.

A.J. Maciejewski (crazyaejay): I understand what you mean and I'm sorry if this sounds arrogant but completing this enormous game then reviewing it is a lot more than many other reviewers can say they did.

I'm sure lots of other game reviewers aren't top level players at whatever games they're reviewing, they just don't always mention this fact in their reviews.

I also don't understand what the reviewer means by «uninspired Lvl - Design», as this game offers quite entertaining, varied, recognizeable and polished stage - designs.

The reviewer states that the dull level designs don't offer any challenge, but then he states that there IS a challenge in some of the «cheaper» tricks in the game and the interesting boss battles.

Another reviewer noted that the graphics are well done, and the game has just enough complexities to justify the higher price of $ 4.99.

Illegal Contact The Barons, Book # 1 By Santino Hassell Author's Website: http://www.santinohassell.com/ Brought to you by OBS reviewer Omar Summary The rules of the game don't apply off the field in this first Barons novel.

According to our reviewer and long - time gamer Jen Edwards, it does a great -LSB-...] Read full article

To be a hundred percent honest, you are playing a numbers game with Amazon reviews, and you don't care what's IN those reviews (unless they're ALL terrible, which probably means something's wrong with your book, not the reviewers).

My point is that at the moment reviewers DO seem to be more tolerant of flaws on 360 games.

If you don't want reviewers to bash your game for not giving the online mode a chance, then make the single player just as engaging or a good companion to the online mode.

No matter what you do you're never exactly sure why your latest game succeeded or failed, what made it work or not work in the eyes of the reviewers.

I'm a fair gamer and I like to hope I'm a fair reviewer but I genuinely didn't want to go any further.

The reviewer is asserting a position of authority over the merits of the game, and many people do take those things as important.

Some reviewers loved the game, others did not and that is completely understandable.

Now if you based all your purchasing on reviewers than what you need to do is find those you trust, not a site but a reviewer and when it's not the guy you trust you need to read the pros & cons of the game and decide from that whether the game is for you or not.

Clearly the reviewer doesn't have much experience with other fps games or they'd know it's been about for over three years now.

Imagine if a reviewer ignored a major problem in the game, because «It'll get fixed» and then that problem never does get fixed?

I got the feeling that most reviewers did only play like 10 to 20 hours into this game (the best part).

As for Yooka Laylee, if it didn't deliver good results for reviewers, it most likely won't sell well because at the end of the day, money's the thing and if the devs don't make profit out of the game, then the game bombed hard.

just because a reviewer put down killzone 2 in a review 2 weeks ago doesn't give you spoiled brats a reason to come in here and bash a totally different game like alan wake.

A 7.5 is STILL a good game - just not groundbreaking, blockbuster, perfect or great, in the opinion of the reviewer - that does nt mean its bad.

This «reviewer» can hate the game if he wants to but don't talk shit.

If you don't think your game is [not] completely finished, then you can upload it to the «Beta» or «Work in Progress» sections where the reviewers and the community are more understanding of you as a developer.

Reviewers or other people's opinions mean squat and I don't let them ruin my enjoyment from any game.

I seriously can't believe none of the reviewers that slapped 10s on this game seemed to miss them, because I sure did, very deeply.

I don't remember seeing any other game reviewer that would concentrate the temporary downfalls of a game as if it's a Core Problem to the game fundamentally, that shows zero foresight into the content that the game does provide.

I think a reviewer's opinion is obviously a part of whether they like a game or not, but they have to be able to objectively qualify why they think the way they do and then weigh that against some sort of criteria that should be set down by the editors (where applicable) to come to a final conclusion on the game's score.

It's a really good game, but not as good as the reviewers are making it out to be» How do you know that exactly, seeing as you havent played it?

I constantly ask game reviewers to post their TROPHY showing they completed the game and they never do.

I'm sorry — but all those reviewers giving this game a 9 or 10/10 are doing gaming a disservice and encouraging more of this sort of flawed story telling.

The only real complaint reviewers had with the game was that the dialogue didn't quite pop, which made me jubilant as I was applying for a writer position and dialogue is my strong point.