Sentences with phrase «game reviewers trying»

Not exact matches

What some reviewers have written about this fact is true but it makes you try harder next time around... with a little more angst in the bat to compensate:) and put more game in you to beat the developers at their game.

While the game's multiplayer has been getting a lot of praise from reviewers on the PC, on PS4 I was only able to find an opponent after an hour of trying.

honestly, every reviewer should try to make their own game or two or five and then realise you can't really be a good video game professional reviewer unless... you have tried to make a game your own.

2) XB fanatics trolling every site and forum trying to prove this game is «not AAA» 3) Even one of the Reviewing sites start to back peddle and try and find excuses for their strange reviews 4) This game is even mentioned by a non game publisher as a «watershed» for the games industry because of the graphics and playability Even a blind man with a stick can feel that something is going wrong here with the «reviewers».

To try and explain what I mean: Sega - 16 has various reviewers and their goal is to review all 16 - bit (and now 8 - bit) Sega games.

Some reviewers (such as the one linked at the end of this article) have criticised it as too simple a game to enjoy singleplayer, but lauded it as a wonderful multiplayer experience while you try to race each other and knock each other off the track.

But trying to belittle a game just because you don't like it (or maybe it's the console) is stupid, when obviously it has something going for it when many people and reviewers view it so highly.

Then the reviewer gives the game a bad score and all of a sudden people agree with it without even trying the game.

In terms of critical reception, IGN reviewer Lucas M. Thomas gave the Virtual Console version a score of 8.5 / 10, encouraging players to give it a try and forget about the common belief that it is a «bad game»; [20] he praised the sound, the gameplay, the length and the presentation, but admitted that the graphics «did not age very well».

I would think that a pretty fundamental qualification for a game reviewer would be to very quickly grasp the systems at play in a game and understand what it's trying to go for and how well it achieves that.

S / he is upset to hear that the game isn't perfect, so s / he tries to «punish» the reviewer by cancelling the pre-order, an act which actually punishes the publisher.

8.5 / 10 for me, giving it a 10 because reviewers these days can only give good marks to the same simple mechanic games and not the ones that try new things.

Does the game merit the universal acclaim it's getting, or is this a case of «Bioshock Infinite Syndrome,» where game reviewers have such a low bar for reviewing games that any game that is pretty and is actually trying to do something vaguely new gets a 10?

Another reviewer wanted to love it, but just couldn't ignore the problems: «I tried so hard to love this game but its blurry picture even with x34, low fps even with gtx 980ti and the hitches and glitches I just don't.»