Sentences with phrase «game things changed»

Minigames could have this too with rules altered and in - game things changed.

Minigames could have this too with rules altered and in - game things changed.

Not exact matches

One thing the previous games did demonstrate, though, was «collaboration absolutely changes the dynamic,» Cann says.

One of the most challenging things to deal with in business is handling difficult customers who are never satisfied and who continue to change the game as the relationship progresses.

The biggest thing is we're in here everyday making this game, making a little change here, a tweak there.

Even if scientists aren't able to reverse aging in that narrow five year window, one thing is certain: CRISPR has completely changed the genetic engineering game.

Essential tried to defy the smartphone industry's rules of the game and do things its own way — in the end, it didn't deliver enough of a change to convince consumers to follow it.

Those game - changing things aren't limited to science experiments and orbiting tourism hubs.

«The game has been played — legally — in New York for years and years, but after the Attorney General realized he could now get himself some press coverage, he decided a game that has been around for a long, long time is suddenly now not legal... The only thing that changed today is the Attorney General's mind.»

«If we could solve the problem of getting to space more effectively than we do now, I think we would find ourselves doing more interesting, potentially game - changing things in low Earth orbit.»

There are certain people, such as Elon Musk and Steve Jobs, that seem to have been brought to this world for one thing: to build game - changing enterprises by challenging the status quo.

Active management is not dead by any stretch of the imagination but many in the active management game may have to change the things they actively manage to stay relevant in the new world of lower fees.

Ok, Im game, what things have you changed with prayer alone?

Fact is, ANYTHING could change the way people are playing, from personal things in life or things like coaches giving bounties, and I highly doubt a 3rd tier QB made the defense play better, or special teams play better or made those 50 yard game winners go through the up rights... you have no idea what you are talking about and it is quite evident.

Man - thing doesn't drink coffee, for the record, so this was an uber win for team awesome, because I'm going to take this as permission to add coffee to pretty much anything from now on.I'm pretty much wired by now to expect coffee straight after a meal, so adding coffee to the meal itself is really game - changing stuff for me.

But one thing is consistent... game - changing innovation takes hard work.

Melissa Clark knows a thing or two about dinner, which is probably why she devoted her new cookbook, Dinner: Changing the Game, to the meal.

From a team standpoint, it's hard for one superstar to completely change things because your best players, unless they are a goalie, only play a third of the game.

There are dozens of these things, and most of the people who actually get tickets to the Super Bowl are dispassionate people in expensive clothes who contribute to the collective murmur - hum that rarely changes, regardless of how exciting the game is.

I also think that Wenger's decision to change things against the Germans at halftime was in answer to having to chase the game and also to get Kolasinac on and keep Bellerin on at the same time.

Of course, this is Arsenal, and they have been distinctly second - best for much of this game today, but things can change quickly in football and Lacazette's goal gave them a fighting chance.

I saw the Chelsea vs Swansea game, and we can see that when things are not working that well, Mourinho would immediately make changes fast, from the start of the 2nd half.

obviously it was really stupid and frustrating what coquelin did which changed the game drastically, I didn't really ever believe they were gonna score Mert and Gabriel were very good but i don't want coquelin to change a thing about his game.

I have given up on Arsene since 2008 I love him but I think he has lost the plot, the most annoying thing about him is his thinking of our player is better than our opponent no matter who we are playing which is a rung mentality because it obvious sometime we are not still not change his tactics for us to get something out of the game.

but they show HARD WORK is one thing that matter, that could change the game atleast than just waiting the ball, then punch the ground when failed to score, or stroking her hair posing like a victorian secret models.

that is the only way wenger will progress in the c / l and league title if not we do need a manager who can do all of those things and a manager that will keep the team motivated from the sidelines, not that i am saying that he should definitely come in but just watch how jurgen klopp interacts with his players all the time and how animated he is from the sideline he motivates his players, (this is what we need sometimes being excellent technically is enough alone) and he is changing games plans form the dugout if something ai nt working unfortunately football is a young managers game now.

4 or 5 good games wont convince me that things are changing for good.

«There's quite a lot of things to change after you lose 3 - 1 at home, but we've done that in recent games.

«The thing that changed it for me was the NFC championship game last year.

Unless we lose our next 3 games, I don't see anything changing on the tactical side of things for Arsenal.

Does not matter how big this game is things need to change, fans being charged too much as clibs make huge amounts each year esp at Arsenal.

For years talented people have been modding the PC version of the NBA 2K games in order to change jerseys, add players, and even re-work the entire thing and put Space Jam in the game — so the possibility is there to mock up something and make people believe they're real.

«There are so many things about her that can simply change a game,» Stone said.

, basing on today's game performance and result it only showed me one thing; Wenger will never learn (he is old enough to adjust to the new changes of the game), wether we buy new players, he will play them out of position still, he will still wait untill the 75 minute to make a sub!

Of course it would be silly to suggest that winning any game, cup or otherwise, isn't good for the club, but let's remember just how problematic FA Cup success has been for this club... I'm certainly not going to suggest I didn't enjoy seeing Arsenal win, I'm a fan of this club first and foremost, but how bad are things when you find yourself secretly wishing that your own team lost so that just maybe real change would finally come... I resent this team for even making me feel such thoughts and it's going to take a lot of effort on their part to earn my trust again... this club has treated the fans so poorly that it has created an incredibly fragile and toxic environment, so much so that a «what have you done for me lately» mentality has emerged... fans rise and fall depending on the results of each game because we don't have faith in those in charge to make the necessary changes to personnel and tactics... each time we win many fans attack any dissenting voices and make unrealistic claims about the players, the manager and the potential for unprecedented success... every time we lose the boo - birds run rampant, calling for heads to roll and predicting the worst... regardless of what side you fall on, it's not your fault, both sides are simply overcompensating for the horrible state of affairs that have been percolating for several years... it's hard to take the long view when those in charge have lied incessantly and refuse to take any responsibilities for their own actions... in the end, we are trapped by the same catch - 22 that ManU faced upon Fergie's exit... less fearful of maintaining the status quo than facing the unknown, which was validated, wrongly or rightly, by witnessing the difficulties they have faced during this transitory period... to be honest, the thing that scares me most is that this team has never prepared whatsoever for this eventuality, which considering our frugal nature and the way we have shunned many of our most revered former players is more than a little disconcerting

With the game in hand and Team USA scrambling frantically to try and pull out a miracle, Luis Scola delivered the exclamation point with a dunk that crowned one country forever and forced real change in another country's way of doing things.

Not communicating with your team in an attempt to proactively change things at effect the course of the game.

with the change of the habitat, the increasing power of players, the stupid things like «the decision», growth in the financials of the game it nearly is impossible to sustain «team first mentality» for star players.

Not coincidentally, Eifert had three key drops in last week's game and I'm guessing Dalton's line would've looked a lot better if the normally sure - handed tight end would've come down with those passes, and the Bengals might've even won (you never know how it changed things).

UEFA changed things to a strict guideline a few years back to say that every Champions League and Europa League game must be played in a «Category 4» stadium.

Luckily, one game could never be the measure of our season's expectation, rather its a warning things need to change and quick.

I don't think he appreciates leaders on the pitch to dictate things to the rest of the squad and to make changes during a game when things are not working.

Have you guys ever considered that Reid was under pressure to change things up because he couldn't win a playoff game.

There are a lot of distractions with the coaching change and hand wringing about the rest of the season, but there is really only one thing to focus on — just win the next game.

The Rangers are only four games back of the second wild card spot as things stand right now, with only a 5.9 % change of making the playoffs, but if they have any hopes of making it that far Beltre playing is obviously more ideal that him not playing.

Funny how this has all turned around in his favour after one game... no wonder the club will never get change or go forward, doing the same thing over & over again expecting different results is madness... Fact!

I wouldn't change a thing for the City game.

As reported by Sky Sports the manager has defended his decision to stick with the same starting XI for all three group games so it looks like he will do so again and if he does need to change things it is likely to be in midfield or attack.

I'd start him for a while to let him get some games in then when he starts to lose his way a little put him on the bench to try and change things later on.

Nowt wrong with a wake up call at the first game, gives us chance to change things about and get some of that grit and winning mentality back.