Sentences with phrase «gameplay than strategy»

Not exact matches

I love resident evil series, i du n no why the 0 game is not very loved like others but this game has innovated with the elimination of item boxes, this means that is more difficult do speedruns and will need a little more strategy to beat the game without backtracking a lot, is also the only game of the ancient gameplay where «hard» is really f*ck * ng hard, i love this game more than 3 entry.

Haunted Temple Studios, as Skulls developer 17 - Bit was calling itself at the time, had brought with it to Boston in 2011 a strategy game with gameplay that was accessible and enjoyable enough to potentially appeal to a larger audience than most of its genre brethren.

The awesome thing about Sneaky Sneaky is that it is perfectly tuned to have you using a mixture of all those forms of gameplay, and it feels faster and more tense than your average strategy game.

BAFTA defines the strategy category as honouring games «centred around the use of strategic gameplay,» rather than simply those that fall into the strategy genre.

This added layer of strategy makes gameplay much more interesting than your average twin stick shooter and I hope to see more games with this cool mechanic down the road.

What it's lacking in story and character development, it more than makes up for in strategy based gameplay.

Rather than having to adjust on the fly to nail tactical gameplay on a new stage every time, players are able to learn the maps and develop strategy in familiar environments.

A fishing game isn't the immediate thing you'd think of when considering potential gameplay directions for titles spun off from the mainline Final Fantasy series; after thirty years we've seen more than our fair share of deviations from the established JRPG formula the franchise helped popularise, including forays into real time strategy and even Chocobo racing games, but FFXV: Monster of the Deep truly stands out as an oddity amongst even those initially curious choices.

Gameplay shifts as each side completes an objective, and teamwork and strategy are rewarded more than number of kills.

As such, there's a little more strategy involved in the gameplay than previous installments.

Where the gameplay can get even better is in the ability to switch out characters when dishing out combos or even when about to take damage, which adds a lot more strategy to each fight involving more than one character on each side.

However, I was pleasantly surprised at how well Dissidia: Final Fantasy incorporates character, gameplay, and even strategy to create more lasting power than just a fight between Cloud and Sephiroth.

Whether or not this all makes sense to you is of little consequence because this is a real - time strategy game, and thus is far more dependent on good gameplay action than it is on storyline.

This may just be a guess, but around the point Pokemon became this huge hit in the late 90's and pretty much owned the turn based strategy genre, spawning dozens of hashed out clones, that could be contributed to why turn - based RPG's started to lose their muster a bit in the last generation and why Square Enix has been so fixated on trying to develop new and interesting combat systems with their latest installments, rather than focusing on what they used to do so well, which was create unique, yet cohesive, quest based stories with endearing characters and gameplay that favors using your mind over your thumbs.

It has some issues sure but what seems like simple gameplay on the surface i.e. land, loot and kill has more depth and subtle strategy than people give it credit for.

While i understand that, i personally prefer games that have enough breadth of gameplay that allow the player to focus on actual strategy more than execution.

A fishing game isn't the immediate thing you'd think of when considering potential gameplay directions for titles spun off from the mainline Final Fantasy series; after thirty years we've seen more than our fair share of deviations from the established JRPG formula the franchise helped popularise, including forays into real time strategy and even Chocobo racing games, but FFXV: Monster of the Deep truly stands out as an oddity amongst even those initially curious choices.

The very simplest of strategies is more than enough to improve your overall gameplay experience.

From both a story and gameplay perspective, God of War has grown up, turning the mindless hack and slash series into something with more thought and strategy than any game in the series that's come before.

But culturalization refers to more aspects of the game than language, including such things as graphics, UI / UX, other gameplay aspects, and the marketing strategy for the game.

But few titles have had gameplay mechanics that convey heroism better than X-Com: UFO Defense (aka UFO: Enemy Unknown), the 1994 strategy game from Microprose where you led a multinational force — soldiers, scientists, pilots and purchasing officers — against an alien invasion.

For starters it was an MMO, so we were talking about thousands of hours of gameplay and a much slower pace, more grand strategy than RTS.

Halo 4 (Visual Engineering and Connectivity) and XCOM: Enemy Unknown (Gameplay Engineering and Strategy / Simulation) were the only other games to win in more than one category.

Well earlier on in development and in some early demos, there was a focus on strategy more than action but over time and with the help of players feedback, we've really shifted the focus on being more action gameplay.

This is another strategy RPG with a superb story and gameplay more than capable of backing it up.

It may take practice, and will result in more than a few failures among even hardened strategy gamers, but the expertly designed gameplay in Mario + Rabbids nonetheless presents something very fresh and exciting for both the Mario franchise and Raving Rabbids franchise alike.

With the push toward more realistic graphics and action - based gameplay, it usually takes an independent team that ends up pushing a strategy game with more statistical tweaks possible than you could ever imagine.

Tiny Tower's strategy offering is a little more special than SuperRope's action gameplay, but both make for ideal distractions during those moments when the kettle boils and you're looking to avoid real work.

Iron Harvest is boasting an advanced cover system and mechanics for destroying the environment around you to turn the tables, which seems to play into it's desire to have the gameplay be more about strategy and precise tactics than clicks per minute.

Everything from its setting (the decidedly non-Tolkienesque fantasy world of Glorantha) and visual style (which consists mostly of static, hand - painted pictures) to gameplay (largely text - based and menu driven, combining the elements of turn - based strategy and choose your own adventure) is very much unlike anything else on the market — now even moreso than at the time of the game's release.