Sentences with phrase «games cost more»

In reality free to play games cost you more than paid games because these types of games designed with micro-transactions in mind and to complete missions they are going to ask you for money.

yes AAA games cost more than ever to make but that doesn't they should be made as a gamer I would expect you'd want them, the features and ideas of AAA games always eventually find their way into smaller games and studios and thats where they flourish and evolve.

Okay, these so called professionals all base the game on the plot, uhh, just playing the demo or watching the trailer will immeadiatly tell you this game isnt about plot, the reason i like this game iscause it is a casual game where you can feel like you can finish it, you know carrying on through the adventure mode little by little, its not meant for the hardcore, while more gameplay mechanics would of been nice (just using the stick and a button is definatly over used) but the real reason this game is fun, the price, its just # 3 ($ 5) and considering a hell of alot of worse games cost more than double this on live arcade you could do alot worse, the only thing blocking this from an 8 is the online community is dead, unfortunatly!

Also, while I realize the price of indie games has gone up dramatically over the past few years, I can acknowledge the wide variance in development costs and myriad other factors going into why some games cost more money, and I fully support the notion that you should pay full price to support developers you want to see succeed and continue making great games.

Nintendo Switch games cost more than PS4 and Xbox One titles.

AAA likes to argue that games cost more to create now, so they have to charge more somehow, but I don't buy this at all - not as the only option.

DLC cost money for games cost more to make today and todays game prices is almost the same as the 80s which with inflation would be 80 $ -100 $ today and PS1 disc games would be around 75 $ -80 $ Today, so todays game is cheaper than ever so complaining about DLC prices mean that you may want smaller games with less stuff or that developer should work cheaper without insurance or coffee.

A study of used Pokemon game prices shows that almost every single used Pokemon game costs more now than what it did before Pokemon GO came out.

good giftbut sunset overdrive was not a stand alone game has shown but a coded down load which we couldnt find in box we did get refund but game cost more than refund

Not exact matches

And that's a problem when Nintendo's competition, Microsoft's Xbox One and Sony's PlayStation 4, have enormous game libraries, cost less, and are more powerful.

«Third - party bundles (games developed by another developer) are more expensive, but in many cases [are] associated with one console over the other... Even third party bundles cost only around $ 40, and the perceived benefit is $ 50 or more... Thus, bundles always make more sense.»

Yet, the Book 2 for $ 2,000 (there's a more basic version that costs $ 1,500) uses the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 for graphics processing, and it worked exceptionally well for Wolfenstein 2, several other visually intense games, and for an Acer AH101 - D8EY Windows Mixed Reality headset and an Oculus Rift for virtual reality.

Profits at ESPN will be squeezed even further because the network's costs have increased so much, he says — it will pay more than $ 6 billion this year for the rights to future sporting events, and the cost of locking up NBA games alone have tripled.

The facts are not right here, energy is cheap that means the cost of manufacturing and transporting of goods is low, food and consumers staples already more affordable, so what if a few American oil companies going out of business.the cost of producing oil in middle east is less than $ 10 / bl and we were paying more than $ 140 / bl for it, with that huge profit margin the big oil companies and oil producing nations became richer and the rest of us left behind, with the oil price this low the oil giants don't want to reduce the price at pump even a penny, because they are so greedy.worst case scenario is some CEOs bonuses might drop from $ 20 million to $ 15 millions I am sure they will survive.in terms of the stock market it always bounces back, after all it's just a casino like game.

The Gospel is not a game show, and pragmatism at all costs costs us much indeed --- more than just a few hundred thousand dollars in prizes.

As Jenell Williams Paris of Messiah College writes in her book The End of Sexual Identity, «Grounding sexual ethics in our humanity more than in contemporary sexual identity categories... comes at a cost to heterosexuals,» because «it puts them in the game as players instead of umpires.»

Enjoy a delicious Gameday Menu, as well as draft brews, signature cocktails and Ponte wine on tap / Sunday, Monday and Thursdays during NFL games broadcast during business hours / Cost: Menu Items $ 13 & Up / For more information please visit www.pontevineyardinn.com

Wenger has changed too much from being under budget for more than a decade, unfortunately it has cost him his ability to adapt to the modern game and it's blatantly obvious, he should simply retire at the end of this season and and give his job to someone who knows how to challenge for the top spot in this modern era.

goodness i can't believe it people will still defend him.You know something when Giroud misses many chances like at Monaco i did not criticize him even based on that you know why?its because he has always not been clinical.The only way a team can improve is by indentifying its problems and solving them.Arsenal has Giroud as the main cf and Welbeck as backup to him.Giroud has done well scoring some goals some too important but collectively he does more harm than good.Do not use moments to judge a player judge him based on content.Giroud does not excel in many games than he excels in games.As a main cf you need to be consistent.I see people here saying Giroud can not dribble he cant do this he cant do that but its a bit crazy to criticize him for that because every player has his own style.Giroud limitations as a player costs arsenal and will cost us a lot.Most importantly his poor finishing which has cost us several times.Not good enough.His style of play is ok for us but a striker who can take on players and run behind defences very well would make us very strong and also should be clinical.For Welbeck he needs to works on his finishing and composure by doing the basic things right.He rushes infront of goal too much.For now he is just above average.However he can excel if he works on improving.Giroud and Welbeck will always be a pain in arsenal's neck for most part.Some will call me stupid but hey at least i want to analyze the problem.People may support Giroud or Welbeck to lead the line next season but as the saying goes if you fool me once shame on you but if you fool me twice shame on me.Will you let Giroud and Welbeck fool you again?

i think carzola's injury seemed to cost us more, we havevnot been on track since... coq's red card at white hart was painful, otherwise we are a few pts behind spurs w a game in hand.

I was more upset about Polak, because it seemed like a few times he made plays that could easily cost games.

- chambers must be banned from playing right back he is going to cost us in a game very soon, he has been taken apart in more than three games, most teams use his side to attack whenever he plays, i think flamini is a better prospect till debuchy and jenkinson come back.

We are more focused on defending than we have been in a few years, especially the midfielders tracking back and the fullbacks sitting deeper, but it has come at the cost of some of the possession game.

If Auba can make the difference between UCL and no Euro football than he can make Arsenal more than what his transfer costs, now I know it is a team game and hard to say 1 player will get us UCL football but sometimes you just need the cherry on the cake (so to speak) and Auba could be that for our attack.

You did see the game, we were outplayed and they had more pace which cost us the game Mertisacker cheating balls down on his 18 yard line was a joke We need now 3 to 4 players this game showed our weakness.

Imo we've been doing a lot better with refs over the past 2 or 3 years (they cost us a lot of matches in the previous 5 or so seasons, far more than our rivals) but seeing that Dean was going to ref this game was a concern still.

WE need a Costa type striker (Nothing wrong with Giroud) who can score by making his own goals apart from taking clear chances, Additional creativity to fight for OZIL (No disrespect but for 42M he has not proved to be a game changer in Big games — Better players even cost less e.g Costa, Hazard - HE MUST DO MORE) and Cazorla position.

NBC, whose Arena Football League openers this year (2.1 rating) outdrew last winter's NHL All - Star Game (1.8), is on the hook only for production costs and the opportunity cost of network time, something that indeed might be spent more profitably.

You don't trade a cost - controlled pro bowl caliber player at one of the most important positions in the game unless you get more than a mid first - rounder back.

The reason athletes are provided more amenities, cost of living stipends, and full scholarships / housing is because their contribution to the university is marketable and profitable — the success of athletic programs in winning college games.

Mustafi / Gabriel neither showed leadership to dominate defensively, both making regular errors, playng offside traps at various times that could have cost us the game, giving up possession too easily in dangerous areas, defensivly the need more work in training

A move to a smaller, more cost - effective stadium — the A's play in cavernous Oakland - Alameda County Coliseum, with its 63,000 permanent seats for Raiders games — is no surprise.

Where were I after the stoke game Who's fault was it for playing 2 LB at CB And the right back at LWB Who's fault was it for not players no Perez more Who dropped Sanchez last year costing us the CL place

When Giroud got injured, fans shouted at the stadium sign a striker, sign a striker and we got weleck.Now we should shout more precisely, sign lacazatte he is the only addation we need.Giroud costed us monacho game, we dropped points with welbeck as a striker

I don't know what games you have watched, but Monreal has done a great job as for Bellirin his last game was his best and full backs have cover from centre backs watch and see Monreal cover for Gibbs going forward and also for Mertisacker Remember Sagna covered for centre backs too and never had a bad game they seem to play better as more room inside to play from Stop picking on Monreal without him we would be in the s,,,,, pick on Wilshire cost us the game against United.

I was more upset perhaps that one game may cost SU the NCAA's.

I just relish the idea he'll be competing with chambo for that side wing back and I'd really like for him to concentrate more on improving this season cause he cost us a few games last season with lack of concentration

he scored more own goals than any other player in the team, He cost us the game against Monaco, for me is time to send him back to Southampton and get Wanyama, at least he will be useful for us, Oxford is useless for us.

Coq i think has tried to be more offensive than defensive this season which has become a problem for the team, he has some what neglected his defensive duties as a DM, i think his unwillingness and naivety in not fouling or stopping Hazard actually cost arsenal the game.

if the Ox was played to either showcase his skills or to increase any potential bids because of his perceived importance to our starting 11, this was an incredibly risky move that could have cost us dearly... imagine if he was injured or played poorly, like he did, and this negatively impacted our ability to get the best available deal... more importantly, why was Wenger willing to play someone who obviously wants out in such an important game under false pretenses... this kind of behaviour might be less offensive in April, when things are done and dusted, but to do this following a loss against a supposed main rival that pipped us for fourth by a point last year, could be considered at best inappropriate and at worst treasonous... we can't afford to let this coach make business decisions on game day, which has gone on for far too long

I'm never in a position to buy them, but playoff tickets, and World Series / Finals tickets in particular, do cost significantly more than a regular season games.

And in - season certain games cost much more based on opponent.

His bad games in which he has cost us points stick around a lot more than the games he's saved us..

Most players in world football are not worth the money paid for them and this article points to that perfectly, however the best players will always cost more and make us fans moan more than usual when they do have a bad game.

Stirling did not cost as much as Cazorla or Ozil, hw is even more younger than them, but the boy will run all game, Henderson is not the best but he puts in the underrated performances.

I'd take Vidal over Pogba any day of the week and he'd cost far less he's more efficient in every aspect of his game.

Off topic anyone notice how ozil was used on the left wing last season and the first part of this season and he was under performing fans and pundits were all saying how wenger should build the team around ozil since that was his best position and he cost us 42m well since his return he has only played either cam or right wing (he said in a interview that those were his fav positions since he played them at real) taking the place of an in form cazorla and it all seems to work I think wenger has done this all on purpose because if u look at ozils overall performance after his injury its much better than before, he tackles, wins the ball back and covers more distance than anyone else wenger does this often using players out of position for a while only to make their overall game better and mostly it works genius

Giroud is better than welbeck anytime anyday, he is more matured, better in assist, better in defending (this is what is costing us problem presently), better in goal scoring, better in nodding, better in hold up, he is stronger, he put all in any game, he allows others to score more.

Time for some brutal honesty... this team, as it stands, is in no better position to compete next season than they were 12 months ago, minus the fact that some fans have been easily snowed by the acquisition of Lacazette, the free transfer LB and the release of Sanogo... if you look at the facts carefully you will see a team that still has far more questions than answers... to better show what I mean by this statement I will briefly discuss the current state of affairs on a position - by - position basis... in goal we have 4 potential candidates, but in reality we have only 1 option with any real future and somehow he's the only one we have actively tried to get rid of for years because he and his father were a little too involved on social media and he got caught smoking (funny how people still defend Wiltshire under the same and far worse circumstances)... you would think we would want to keep any goaltender that Juventus had interest in, as they seem to have a pretty good history when it comes to that position... as far as the defenders on our current roster there are only a few individuals whom have the skill and / or youth worthy of our time and / or investment, as such we should get rid of anyone who doesn't meet those simple requirements, which means we should get rid of DeBouchy, Gibbs, Gabriel, Mertz and loan out Chambers to see if last seasons foray with Middlesborough was an anomaly or a prediction of things to come... some fans have lamented wildly about the return of Mertz to the starting lineup due to his FA Cup performance but these sort of pie in the sky meanderings are indicative of what's wrong with this club and it's wishy - washy fan - base... in addition to these moves the club should aggressively pursue the acquisition of dominant and mobile CB to stabilize an all too fragile defensive group that has self - destructed on numerous occasions over the past 5 seasons... moving forward and building on our need to re-establish our once dominant presence throughout the middle of the park we need to target a CDM then do whatever it takes to get that player into the fold without any of the usual nickel and diming we have become famous for (this kind of ruthless haggling has cost us numerous special players and certainly can't help make the player in question feel good about the way their future potential employer feels about them)... in order for us to become dominant again we need to be strong up the middle again from Goalkeeper to CB to DM to ACM to striker, like we did in our most glorious years before and during Wenger's reign... with this in mind, if we want Ozil to be that dominant attacking midfielder we can't keep leaving him exposed to constant ridicule about his lack of defensive prowess and provide him with the proper players in the final third... he was never a good defensive player in Real or with the German National squad and they certainly didn't suffer as a result of his presence on the pitch... as for the rest of the midfield the blame falls squarely in the hands of Wenger and Gazidis, the fact that Ramsey, Ox, Sanchez and even Ozil were allowed to regularly start when none of the aforementioned had more than a year left under contract is criminal for a club of this size and financial might... the fact that we could find money for Walcott and Xhaka, who weren't even guaranteed starters, means that our whole business model needs a complete overhaul... for me it's time to get rid of some serious deadweight, even if it means selling them below what you believe their market value is just to simply right this ship and change the stagnant culture that currently exists... this means saying goodbye to Wiltshire, Elneny, Carzola, Walcott and Ramsey... everyone, minus Elneny, have spent just as much time on the training table as on the field of play, which would be manageable if they weren't so inconsistent from a performance standpoint (excluding Carzola, who is like the recent version of Rosicky — too bad, both will be deeply missed)... in their places we need to bring in some proven performers with no history of injuries... up front, although I do like the possibilities that a player like Lacazette presents, the fact that we had to wait so many years to acquire some true quality at the striker position falls once again squarely at the feet of Wenger... this issue highlights the ultimate scam being perpetrated by this club since the arrival of Kroenke: pretend your a small market club when it comes to making purchases but milk your fans like a big market club when it comes to ticket prices and merchandising... I believe the reason why Wenger hasn't pursued someone of Henry's quality, minus a fairly inexpensive RVP, was that he knew that they would demand players of a similar ilk to be brought on board and that wasn't possible when the business model was that of a «selling» club... does it really make sense that we could only make a cheeky bid for Suarez, or that we couldn't get Higuain over the line when he was being offered up for half the price he eventually went to Juve for, or that we've only paid any interest to strikers who were clearly not going to press their current teams to let them go to Arsenal like Benzema or Cavani... just part of the facade that finally came crashing down when Sanchez finally called their bluff... the fact remains that no one wants to win more than Sanchez, including Wenger, and although I don't agree with everything that he has done off the field, I would much rather have Alexis front and center than a manager who has clearly bought into the Kroenke model in large part due to the fact that his enormous ego suggests that only he could accomplish great things without breaking the bank... unfortunately that isn't possible anymore as the game has changed quite dramatically in the last 15 years, which has left a largely complacent and complicit Wenger on the outside looking in... so don't blame those players who demanded more and were left wanting... don't blame those fans who have tried desperately to raise awareness for several years when cracks began to appear... place the blame at the feet of those who were well aware all along of the potential pitfalls of just such a plan but continued to follow it even when it was no longer a financial necessity, like it ever really was...

The fact that the club is for sale for an amount a little more than the cost Manchester City paid for frankly average defender Joleon Lescott probably says all that needs to be said about the state the game could find itself in if it continues to use money in an obscene and unsustainable manner