Sentences with phrase «games we lose because»

@Analyzer you didn't really mean that when you asked can anybody pin point any games we lost because we did not have a DM?

O'Mert, O'Dead Wood If we count how many games we lost because of him in 5 years, it is not les than 20.

When you look back at the games we lost because of injuries, even with his bench it was a ploy to make the opposition think he had numbers but half the bench was not fit.

The DM position everyone in football said the same thing but AW never changed and the amount of games we lose because of it is mind blowing.for FQ to move on to the next level we need a world class DM end of.

When the good game loses because the majority would vote for a [DELETED] AAA wannabe over any amazing indie, it'd get put up with a discount at least and some of these will be on release day so it's still a good deal.

Not exact matches

It lost some allure for me, mostly because I didn't see that the games had improved that much.

There's not a lot of social tools or games, which is good because you won't get lost in all the features as you may on other sites.

If you're fighting a boss in the new «Zelda» game, for instance, and the controller disconnects midfight, you could conceivably lose the fight because of that disconnection.

Many of the international players in this game don't just stand to lose because they will find it harder to export their steel to the U.S.; they will also now have to deal with the issue of the biggest exporters — China in particular — now seeking other places to dump their wares.

It is disadvantageous for you is the weak players flee the market (selling their stocks and buying index funds), or if the least capable professional investors lose assets to passive funds, because it means that only the smartest investors remain in the active game.

As David Dayen wrote for The New Republic during the first round of the Amazon HQ2 sweepstakes, «[T] hey're worse than a zero - sum game between metropolitan areas; they're net - negative, because the corporation extracts the subsidy while cities lose revenue that would otherwise go to education or infrastructure investment to benefit the common good.»

Investors fall for these games because they're lost in market illusions, Bogle says.

These won't likely be from established developers because they don't want to lose out on the profits they make from selling in - game DLC...

So there's not a lot of room for redemption in the current discourse, because our emphasis is entirely on telling people that they can never screw up, not even once, and when they do the whole game is lost.

Seminary rector Monsignor James Checchio explains that the squad took that name back in the 1980s because «we lost every game.

It escapes the ruthless cycle of winning and losing because it refuses to play the game.

I think we lost so many games last season because of poor tactics and planning....

but u are continuinh talking about «our philosophy»...» our philosophy» like u said has been pass the ball without any idea and without winning any mayor throphy for the last 12 years... so let alexis do what he do... he can lose balls, but he scores, he creates, he fights, give us beautifull moments of football, and better than all, win us games... a team with 11 ozil does nt win games... with 11 alexis yes... so stop demanding more ozils and to criticate alexis... it is not a coincidence that ozil always looks for alexis, its because he knows alexis is the man who can transform him from the most creative player to the assist king, and again, better, eho can help him to win games (i love ozil and he is a winner, do nt missundertand me)..

It is strange really, because when the Gunners were enjoying our most successful period, which culminated in the amazing and perhaps never to be matched achievement of winning the Premier League without losing a single game, it was with the combative midfield warrior Patrick Vieira at the heart of the side.

Don't presume that, just because I can keep a little perspective from game to game and week to week, doesn't mean that I don't want and expect a winner, or that I'm happy with losing or with all of Hakstol's decision - making.

Losing faith with Arsene Wenger and the Arsenal players because we lost an away game at the strongest team in the Premier League?

There are three things telling me that Arsenal will lose this game and it's mainly because I don't think we will score a goal.

We lost the game because I feel we started well and after that maybe we lost a bit of urgency because we were a bit too comfortable and then Everton made it very physical.....»

He also needs to stop being this predictable and one dimensional, he always gets the ball and you know he will lose it or give a poor pass, he always cuts inside and it's not working because defenders have worked him out, vary your game and start going on the outside.

When you lose your first home game, you can not afford to drop points in the second home game because it creates a little bit of anxiety at home and that's not what we really want.

The reason why everyone is so pissed off is not because we lost a game, it is because we lost many many games through out the years for reasons everyone could see and a man who makes 8 million pounds a year, does not find the players and the tactics, the motivating factors, basically the solutions to build a winning team and a fighting mentality.

We must step it up in the big games, because we should have definitely lost to PSG twice, United, and arguably could have lost to Spurs as well.

Its a shame that we are happy when we lost a game match because others drew!

Le Prof said on the Arsenal Official website: «The regret is that we lost this game because it was a self - inflicted defeat.

«It was a shame to lose him but he should get a great reception because he was a great player for Arsenal and loved playing for Arsenal, you could tell that and every game when he came on he gave everything, it's just a shame that we lost him to Liverpool.»

But I think we may lose one of our best midfielders at the end of this season due to someone being unhappy with a lack of game time because there's so much competition.

Instead he plays Ramsay on the right and kept playing little passes all game long (75 % possession) i mean that is laughable because he came to this game not to lose, he did not come to win this game in the fear that he might lose it.

I have given up on Arsene since 2008 I love him but I think he has lost the plot, the most annoying thing about him is his thinking of our player is better than our opponent no matter who we are playing which is a rung mentality because it obvious sometime we are not still not change his tactics for us to get something out of the game.

If I were to go out and get beat and then realize after the game that I got beat because of something I did the day before... to me, that'd be the worst way to lose.

He has lost the plot years ago but not to frustrate us simply because he is old and did not develop with the game.

The substitute was nothing because we lost the game before it evenue started with that line up.

I didn't even watch the game today simply because I am starting to lose interest in this club UNDER WENGER.

Every year for the last four or five years, ever since I started to win, I could always think back to five or six ball games that I didn't win because I got mad out there and lost control of myself.

I also don't get why Pundits even bother analysing games when Arsenal lose like this, because they keep saying the same thing, weak in defence, no leadership and no communication.

But that doesn't sit well with me as an explanation simply because the reason why we pushed last season so hard to finish in the top 3 was to avoid having to play AGAIN CL qualifiers and be fresh come 1st game now we go the other way to explain WHY we lost.

I think the main reason why we lose games when Wilshere is playing is because he runs the game single handly.

Walcott is Lost up Front I really have a problem when someone ignores the different possible tactics of the game because they do no believe the one picked was the right one.

We lost the game against Chelsea in China because Chelsea started with a full strength side and we fielded some youngsters who were out of their depth and got swamped.

He is very crucial for us and also we didn't have much defenders for back - up if some one goes out for long period of time... It should not happen, but if Debuchy is out for more weeks we should change our formation too 3 defenders i.e like of Netherland, because losing one more defender with already defender one out will bring us with atmost 1 defender as back - up... So, lets hope Debuchy is fit for next BPL game...

Most of the time when we lose games it's because of gaps in the squad.

Losing 2 games to tournament teams and a 3rd in the Big Ten tournament leaves us at 19 - 13 (9 - 9), there's no way that we fall 16 + spots in the NIT pecking order because of that.

«Tactical reasons» is what the Sky Sports report on the game said and if that is true then we really are in trouble because our manager must have lost the plot.

«It was a difficult game because they looked very good going forward and came out very quickly every time we lost the ball.»

Let's be honest, if that sending off had turned the game and we lost, there is no way the FA would have dismissed the ban because the implications would have been enormous.

He tends to lose focus a bit and mess up simple plays because he's trying to do too much, and playing Emelin isn't helping his offensive game nor his defensive game.