But it is fundamental to understanding how a «greenhouse»
gas absorbs radiation, and fundamental to understanding why some of us think the whole global warming scare is a total scam.
The trace
gases absorb the radiation of the surface and radiate at the temperature of the air which is, at some height, most of the time slightly lower that of the surface.
Anthropogenic greenhouse
gases absorb the radiation from Earth's surface back into space and send part of it back to Earth.
Not exact matches
This involves determining the composition of a planetary atmosphere by measuring its spectra, the distinctive
radiation that
gases absorb at their own particular wavelengths.
Ultraviolet light from early, blueish stars (illustrated) interacted with hydrogen
gas, causing it to
absorb background
radiation, and creating a signature scientists have now detected.
Solar
radiation management attempts to offset effects of greenhouse
gases by causing Earth to
absorb less solar
radiation.
Geoengineering schemes use two ways to offset this process: They either remove the
gases from the atmosphere, allowing more
radiation to exit, or deflect a portion of the sun's light — about 1.8 percent should do the trick — reducing the amount of
radiation absorbed by the earth.
For most people, the risk of
absorbing excess ionizing
radiation comes mainly through breathing radon, a
gas released by uranium and thorium in soils.
At some of these overlaps, the atmosphere already
absorbs 100 % of
radiation, meaning that adding more greenhouse
gases can not increase absorption at these specific frequencies.
A: Global warming occurs when carbon dioxide (CO2) and other air pollutants and greenhouse
gases collect in the atmosphere and
absorb sunlight and solar
radiation that have bounced off the earth's surface.
Another possible explanation for the strong radio signal Bowman and the EDGES team discovered is that there's more radio background
radiation being
absorbed, rather than the hydrogen
gas being colder than previously thought.
It's not totally about how much infrared from the surface that is blocked (currently about 90 % of surface emissions is
absorbed by greenhouse
gases), its also about the height within the atmosphere from which
radiation escapes.
Carbon dioxide, as well as CH4 and other
gases,
absorb and re-emit longwave
radiation back to the earth's surface that would otherwise radiate rapidly into outer space, thus warming the Earth.
I suspect the problem here is that you are thinking of greenhouse
gases as blocking thermal
radiation such that once the
radiation is
absorbed there isn't any reemission.
That the nebula is so much brighter than the star shows that the star emits primarily highly energetic
radiation of the non-visible part of the electro - magnetic spectrum, which is
absorbed by exciting the nebula's
gas, and re-emitted by the nebula, at last to a good part in the visible light.
Whether being lesser than CO2 in number of molecules in the atmosphere, methane is a potent greenhouse
gas absorbing more infra - red
radiation per molecule than CO2.
If the temperature decreased with altitude, infrared
radiation would at some point pass through a region of cooler water -
gas, which would
absorb the part of the spectrum responsible for the glowing effect, he explained.
In doing so, as the CMB photons traveled through this hydrogen
gas, it
absorbed a particular frequency — so rather than look for a specific emission, astronomers have been looking for a specific type of absorption, or a certain frequency of CMB
radiation that was missing.
However, when a coma develops, dust reflects still more sunlight, and
gas in the coma
absorbs ultraviolet
radiation and begins to fluoresce.
Any short wavelength
radiation that might have been emitted was quickly
absorbed by the atomic
gas, and a long interval known as the Dark Ages began.
Gases which
absorb radiation will radiate in all directions.
In 1861, John Tyndal published laboratory results identifying carbon dioxide as a greenhouse
gas that
absorbed heat rays (longwave
radiation).
Much of this
radiation is returned to the space and the other part is
absorbed by the layer of
gas surrounding atmosphere causing the greenhouse effect.
The greenhouse
gases absorb some infrared
radiation emitted by the surface of the Earth and in turn radiate the
absorbed energy back to the surface.
ABM: The whole point about the greenhouse
gases in a planetary atmosphere is that they
absorb the infrared
radiation emitted by the surface, and so Kirchhoff's law does not apply.
If the temperature below is warmer than the local temperature, IR
radiation that is re-radiated is less than is
absorbed, the net effect of the greenhouse
gases is to warm that layer.
So I agree with William, the cooling effect at the top of the atmosphere requires that the atmosphere be
absorbing some incoming
radiation (and that this absorption be (mostly) by non-greenhouse
gasses).
Question 3: Third sentence: «Greenhouse
gases re-radiate the
absorbed energy in all directions, and thus part of this
radiation goes back to the surface leads to warming.»
Greenhouse
gases (like CO2, CH4 or water)
absorb and re-radiate infra - red (IR)
radiation that is emitted from the planet's surface at rates that depend on the temperature (the Stefan - Boltzmann law).
If we are talking about clear atmosphere, then no, because the
radiation will be ONLY at exactly those frequencies where the greenhouse
gases above and below
absorb / emit.
Barton, For the atmosphere to be in thermodynamic equilibrium, the greenhouse
gases must be emitting as much
radiation as they
absorb.
This knowledge is not new; the same year as Charles Darwin published «The Origin of Species», John Tyndall, an Irish scientist, published a paper in 1859 describing how he measured the absorption of infrared
radiation in his laboratory, finding that CO2 and water vapour
absorbed the
radiation, whereas nitrogen and oxygen, the main
gases in the atmosphere, do not.
The point is that although selection rules will determine whether a molecular vibration can
absorb IR
radiation, and is obviously necessary for a complete discussion of the issue, the issue can be simply addressed by consideration of the frequencies of absorption by the
gas and emission by the planet.
Words only have meaning in context and while it may be true that water vapor is a greenhouse
gas in the sense that more of it in the atmosphere will
absorb more infrared
radiation and warm the climate, it is not a greenhouse
gas in the sense that it is a
gas we need to seriously worry about adding directly to the atmosphere.
The elevation of the atmospheric temperature is due to a shift in the radiative equilibrium, i.e. more back
radiation absorbed by added
gases, selective to IR
radiation.
CO2 (and some other
gases) in the atmosphere are however more opaque to LWIR; they
absorb that a chunk of that outgoing
radiation and re-radiate it in all directions — so that a fraction less than half is re-radiated downwards; which has the effect of slowing the transfer of heat (by
radiation) out of the atmosphere.
ie does a slightly lower density of air mean a slightly lower ground level temperature (temperature normally decreases with height at the lower air density), so that in reality adding CO2 and subtracting more O2 actually causes miniscule or trivial global COOLING, and the (unused) ability of the changed atmosphere to
absorb radiation energy and transmit it to the rest of the air is overruled or limited by the ideal
gas law?
Diatomic molecules like O2 and N2 are transparent to that
radiation and will never fit the definition of a greenhouse
gas, no matter that they
absorb heat via other means.
1) Greenhouse
gasses absorb infrared
radiation in the atmosphere and re-emit much of it back toward the surface, thus warming the planet (less heat escapes; Fourier, 1824).
In reply to # 1, greenhouse
gases absorb selective bands of
radiation in the atmosphere and re-radiate them in all directions as longer wave infrared.
Greenhouse
gases absorb thermal
radiation from the surface and slow radiative loss to space.
I explained to you on your own website that, whether you call them greenhouse
gases or not, CO2, CH4, N20 behave differently from N2 and O2: GHGs
absorb outgoing long wave
radiation and N2 and O2 don't.
In the case of an increase in greenhouse
gases (which cause a warming), that implies that the planet will be
absorbing more solar
radiation than it emits as longwave
radiation.
As far as climatic impact is concerned, however, the fraction of the total mass of the atmosphere is irrelevant since the atmosphere consists of 99.9 % nitrogen, oxygen and argon, i.e.
gases which can not
absorb infrared
radiation.
Only molecules made of at least three atoms
absorb heat
radiation and thus only such trace
gases makes the greenhouse effect, and among these CO2 is the second most important after water vapor.
The reason is that the Earth has an atmosphere that contains
gases that
absorb thermal
radiation.
We also know quite accurately the spectral absorption characteristics for the
absorbing gases, and how cloud and aerosol particles interact with thermal
radiation.
CO2 is largely transparent to visual
radiation but
absorbs greatly in the infrared, i.e., it is a greenhouse
gas.
1) Scientists have long known that greenhouse
gases in the atmosphere — such as carbon dioxide, methane, or water vapor —
absorb certain frequencies of infrared
radiation and scatter them back toward the Earth.
Maybe we can do an informal poll here - Do you agree that CO2 is a greenhouse
gas (i.e.,
absorbs and re-emits long wave
radiation)?»