That's the conclusion of a Carnegie Institution for Science study... that shows two things: Emissions from burning a lump of coal or a gallon of
gas has an effect on the climate 100,000 times greater than the heat given off by burning the fossil fuel itself.
Not exact matches
If current estimates are correct that the leakage rate is around 3 percent, then we calculated that switching all coal plants to average - efficiency natural
gas plants
would have little
effect on the power sector's contribution to
climate change.
But the impact these
gases have on the
climate has until now not been as widely studied as the
effects of carbon dioxide emissions.
But the reactive
gases emitted by trees can also increase the amounts of ozone and methane, both greenhouse
gases which
have warming
effects on the
climate.
However, natural
gas has the huge disadvantage that it generates CO2 during combustion, which
has a detrimental
effect on the
climate.
«It is widely understood that aerosols
have a net cooling
effect on climate, counteracting the warming caused by greenhouse
gases.
The study applied «medium to high» future emissions estimates of heat - trapping
gases, as assumed by the California state government, to models designed to assess what
effect climate change
would have on national parks like Yosemite, Death Valley, Redwood, Joshua Tree and Sequoia.
7It is particularly ironic that Lomborg
would offer such a ridiculously precise estimate of the cost of the impacts of
climate change from carbon dioxide emissions, inasmuch as the entire thrust of his books chapter
on «global warming» is that practically nothing about the
effects of greenhouse
gases is known with certainty.
In the time since the 2007 version of this report, the human
effect on the
climate has grown more than 40 percent stronger, thanks to continued emissions of greenhouse
gases and more precision in measurements, with carbon dioxide leading the charge.
Though burning natural
gas produces much less greenhouse
gas emissions than burning coal, a new study indicates switching over coal - fired power plants to natural
gas would have a negligible
effect on the changing
climate.
«Now we
have greater confidence that volcanism and its
effect on the greenhouse
gas content of the atmosphere drove
climate change in deep time,» says Kump.
Now if this was the 1980s they might
have had a point, but the fact that aerosols are an important
climate forcing,
have a net cooling
effect on climate and, in part, arise from the same industrial activities that produce greenhouse
gases,
has been part of mainstream science for 30 years.
These four worksheets help students to understand
climate change, greenhouse
gases and the
effect they
have on our mountains and planet as well as discuss the possible solutions to the continuing problem.
Michael Lemonick of
Climate Central, who's been writing wisely on the greenhouse effect and climate change since 1987, has a sobering piece at Climate Central on the gulf between climate discourse around Hurricane Sandy and a meaningful response on greenhouse - gas emi
Climate Central, who's been writing wisely
on the greenhouse
effect and
climate change since 1987, has a sobering piece at Climate Central on the gulf between climate discourse around Hurricane Sandy and a meaningful response on greenhouse - gas emi
climate change since 1987,
has a sobering piece at
Climate Central on the gulf between climate discourse around Hurricane Sandy and a meaningful response on greenhouse - gas emi
Climate Central
on the gulf between
climate discourse around Hurricane Sandy and a meaningful response on greenhouse - gas emi
climate discourse around Hurricane Sandy and a meaningful response
on greenhouse -
gas emissions.
pg xiii This Policymakers Summary aims to bring out those elements of the main report which
have the greatest relevance to policy formulation, in answering the following questions • What factors determine global climate 7 • What are the greenhouse gases, and how and why are they increasing 9 • Which gases are the most important 9 • How much do we expect the climate to change 9 • How much confidence do we have in our predictions 9 • Will the climate of the future be very different 9 • Have human activities already begun to change global climate 9 How much will sea level rise 9 • What will be the effects on ecosystems 9 • What should be done to reduce uncertainties, and how long will this take 9 This report is intended to respond to the practical needs of the policyma
have the greatest relevance to policy formulation, in answering the following questions • What factors determine global
climate 7 • What are the greenhouse
gases, and how and why are they increasing 9 • Which
gases are the most important 9 • How much do we expect the
climate to change 9 • How much confidence do we
have in our predictions 9 • Will the climate of the future be very different 9 • Have human activities already begun to change global climate 9 How much will sea level rise 9 • What will be the effects on ecosystems 9 • What should be done to reduce uncertainties, and how long will this take 9 This report is intended to respond to the practical needs of the policyma
have in our predictions 9 • Will the
climate of the future be very different 9 •
Have human activities already begun to change global climate 9 How much will sea level rise 9 • What will be the effects on ecosystems 9 • What should be done to reduce uncertainties, and how long will this take 9 This report is intended to respond to the practical needs of the policyma
Have human activities already begun to change global
climate 9 How much will sea level rise 9 • What will be the
effects on ecosystems 9 • What should be done to reduce uncertainties, and how long will this take 9 This report is intended to respond to the practical needs of the policymaker.
I am part of that community; we agree that human greenhouse
gas emissions are
having a huge, negative
effect on global
climate.
The take - away is that if the Sun were now to stop all activity, as during the 16th - century Maunder Minimum, it
would produce an
effect on climate no greater than the next twenty years» worth of greenhouse
gas emissions — some say, ten years.
[UPDATE 5:30 p.m. Voices added below] Most concerns about growing emissions of carbon dioxide
have focused
on the
gas's heat - trapping
effect on climate.
However, he fails to discuss how, even though the detailed results may vary, all of these
climate models indicate our emissions of greenhouse
gases will
have a substantial
effect on the
climate system in the coming decades.
They say their findings, which focused
on the
effect titling
had on forest clearing and disturbance in the Peruvian Amazon between 2002 and 2005, suggest that the increasing trend towards decentralized forest governance via granting indigenous groups and other local communities formal legal title to their lands could play a key role in global efforts to slow both tropical forest destruction, which the researchers note is responsible for about the same amount of greenhouse
gas emissions as the transportation sector, and
climate change.»
Even if CO2 Scorecard is correct that the
effect of natural
gas on emissions
has been less than previously believed, delivering one quarter of U.S. carbon cuts is still «pretty significant,» said Michael Tubman, a senior fellow at the Center for
Climate and Energy Solutions (C2ES), a nonprofit policy organization.
ANY conclusions vis a vis a change in a trace atmospheric
gas, that itself
has both positive and negative
effects on Earth's
climate are hard to analyze yet — another 100 years of satellite data will help correct that!
These feedbacks and their complex relations make me sceptical about our ability to predict what
effects our greenhouse
gas emissions
have on the
climate.
You'll note an acceleration of those temperatures in the late 1970s as greenhouse
gas emissions from energy production increased worldwide and clean air laws reduced emissions of pollutants that
had a cooling
effect on the
climate, and thus were masking some of the global warming signal.
As the new Ceres report notes: «ExxonMobil does not analyze or quantify the
effect on the company and
on shareholder value of any plausible greenhouse
gas regulatory scenarios; in fact, the company states that «it is impossible today to assess the potential implications for shareholder value from initiatives to address
climate change,» in part because no governments
have established definitive regulations for the 2008 - 2012 Kyoto period or for post-2012.
Higher density sources of fuel such as coal and natural
gas utilized in centrally - produced power stations actually improve the environmental footprint of the poorest nations while at the same time lifting people from the scourge of poverty... Developing countries in Asia already burn more than twice the coal that North America does, and that discrepancy will continue to expand... So, downward adjustments to North American coal use will
have virtually no
effect on global CO2 emissions (or the
climate), no matter how sensitive one thinks the
climate system might be to the extra CO2 we are putting back into the atmosphere.
Atmospheric concentrations of OH affect the atmospheric lifetimes of greenhouse
gases, their abundance, and, ultimately, the
effect they
have on climate.
John Carter August 8, 2014 at 12:58 am chooses to state his position
on the greenhouse
effect in the following 134 word sentence: «But given the [1] basics of the greenhouse
effect, the fact that with just a very small percentage of greenhouse
gas molecules in the air this
effect keeps the earth about 55 - 60 degrees warmer than it
would otherwise be, and the fact that through easily recognizable if [2] inadvertent growing patterns we
have at this point probably at least [3] doubled the total collective amount in heat absorption and re-radiation capacity of long lived atmospheric greenhouse
gases (nearly doubling total that of the [4] leading one, carbon dioxide, in the modern era), to [5] levels not collectively seen
on earth in several million years — levels that well predated the present ice age and extensive earth surface ice conditions — it goes [6] against basic physics and basic geologic science to not be «predisposed» to the idea that this
would ultimately impact
climate.»
While the greenhouse
gas footprint of the production of other foods, compared to sources such as livestock, is highly dependent
on a number of factors, production of livestock currently accounts for about 30 % of the U.S. total emissions of methane.316, 320,325,326 This amount of methane can be reduced somewhat by recovery methods such as the use of biogas digesters, but future changes in dietary practices, including those motivated by considerations other than
climate change mitigation, could also
have an
effect on the amount of methane emitted to the atmosphere.327
So while the consensus that CO2 is a «greenhouse»
gas, meaning that like water vapor and methane it absorbs and radiates solar energy in known quanta, there is no consensus
on the
effect or «sensitivity» Earth's
climate has to increases or decreases in it.
The world's efforts to reduce
climate change are not
having the desired
effect on the levels of greenhouse
gases that are found in the atmosphere.
8 Energy of incoming sunlight drives Earth's weather and helps determine
climate Presence of certain
gases in the atmosphere also
has an
effect on its temperature.
«The human impact
on global
climate is small, and any warming that may occur as a result of human carbon dioxide (CO2) and other greenhouse
gas emissions is likely to
have little
effect on global temperatures, the cryosphere (ice - covered areas), hydrosphere (oceans, lakes, and rivers), or weather.
The last 500 million years with no sustained average global temperature change demonstrates CO2, in spite of being a greenhouse
gas,
has no
effect on climate.
Climate sensitivity describes the
effect that increases in CO2 (and other greenhouse
gases)
have on the global near - surface air temperature.
«Notwithstanding any provision of title III or
V, no stationary source shall be required to apply for, or operate pursuant to, a permit under title
V, solely because the source emits any greenhouse
gases that are regulated solely because of their
effect on global
climate change.».
«created and lavishly financed institutes to produce anti-global-warming studies, paid for rallies and Web sites to question the science, and generated scores of economic analyses that purport to show that policies to reduce emissions of
climate - altering
gases will
have a devastating
effect on jobs and the overall economy.»
Raising the alarm about
climate change
has been tried before, many times in fact, but it
has not
had an appreciable
effect on greenhouse
gas emissions.
The established science shows carbon dioxide is a greenhouse
gas, that humans produce greenhouse
gas emissions, and that humans
have had some
effect on Earth's
climate.
Alas, I believe the preponderance of evidence strongly supports the claim that anthropogenic emissions are
having an
effect on the global
climate, and that
effect will increase as greenhouse
gases accumulate in the atmosphere.
On the other hand, reductions in greenhouse gas emissions, while essential in the long term, would have no immediate effect on the Arctic climate because of their long lifetime.&raqu
On the other hand, reductions in greenhouse
gas emissions, while essential in the long term,
would have no immediate
effect on the Arctic climate because of their long lifetime.&raqu
on the Arctic
climate because of their long lifetime.»
We instead conclude that solar forcing probably
had a minor
effect on Northern Hemisphere
climate over the past 1,000 years, while, volcanic eruptions and changes in greenhouse
gas concentrations seem to be the most important influence over this period.
One reason is that the same fires and factories that produce black carbon also produce other particulates and
gases that actually
have a cooling
effect on the
climate.
Because this issue pertains to the
effects of greenhouse
gases on the
climate, it seems that a scholars definition
would be better that a religious one.
Washington, D.C. - During a hearing today in the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee, EPA Administrator Jackson confirmed an EPA analysis showing that unilateral U.S. action to reduce greenhouse
gas emissions
would have no
effect on climate.
Greenhouse
gases have a cooling
effect on the stratosphere, and
climate change is likely to also alter atmospheric transport and circulation patterns.
Which points out the anemic
effect that U.S. greenhouse
gas reductions will
have on the
climate of the U.S. and just how easily the whims of foreign nations, not to mention Mother Nature, can completely offset any
climate changes induced by our greenhouse
gas emissions reductions.»
Over the past decade, ExxonMobil shareholders
have offered resolution after resolution calling for the oil and
gas company to take positive steps toward reducing carbon dioxide emissions and to be more open and transparent regarding the
effect its products
have on our global
climate system.
Most attention in the debate over
climate change
has been based
on the assumption of a gradual increase in mean global temperatures, equilibrating to a new higher level some decades after concentrations of greenhouse
gases have stabilized, with
effects that will then play out for centuries.
Both of these
effects, along with changes in natural variables must be examined explicitly by efforts to understand
climate change and devise policy that complies with the objective of Article 2 of the 1992 United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change to stabilize «greenhouse gas concentrations in the atmosphere at a level that would prevent dangerous anthropogenic interference in the climate system.
climate change and devise policy that complies with the objective of Article 2 of the 1992 United Nations Framework Convention
on Climate Change to stabilize «greenhouse gas concentrations in the atmosphere at a level that would prevent dangerous anthropogenic interference in the climate system.
Climate Change to stabilize «greenhouse
gas concentrations in the atmosphere at a level that
would prevent dangerous anthropogenic interference in the
climate system.
climate system.»