«We expect a widespread increase in heavy precipitation due to greenhouse
gas warming leading to a moister atmosphere,» explains climatologist Gabriele Hegerl of the University of Edinburgh in Scotland.
Not exact matches
Stephen Harper's opposition to remedial climate measures
led to Canada withdrawing from the Kyoto Protocol, an international agreement to reduce greenhouse
gases, the immediate cause of the
warming trend.
A team of researchers
lead by Florida State University have found new evidence that permafrost thawing is releasing large quantities of greenhouse
gases into the atmosphere via plants, which could accelerate
warming trends.
A University of Alaska Fairbanks -
led research project has provided the first modern evidence of a landscape - level permafrost carbon feedback, in which thawing permafrost releases ancient carbon as climate -
warming greenhouse
gases.
Seepage of carbon dioxide from long - term carbon capture and storage projects may
lead to delayed global
warming unless the
gas can be tightly controlled, according to a new study.
Already, atmospheric levels of carbon dioxide, the
leading greenhouse
gas, are approaching 400 ppm, and at least the amount of
warming caused by that level is likely by century's end.
«As the climate gets
warmer, the thawing permafrost not only enables the release of more greenhouse
gases to the atmosphere, but our study shows that it also allows much more mineral - laden and nutrient - rich water to be transported to rivers, groundwater and eventually the Arctic Ocean,» explained Ryan Toohey, a researcher at the Interior Department's Alaska Climate Science Center in Anchorage and the
lead author of the study.
This is unacceptable at a time when
leading scientists from all over the world are warning that greenhouse
gases must be cut by at least 60 percent over the next half a century to avert the worst consequences of global
warming.
The conclusion of the authors: The
warming climate triggers not only the natural production of biogenic methane, it can also
lead to stronger emissions of fossil
gas.
The research suggests that — contrary to some prior findings — CO2
led the prior round of global
warming rather than vice versa, just as it continues to do today thanks to rising emissions of CO2 and other greenhouse
gases.
A surprising recent rise in atmospheric methane likely stems from wetland emissions, suggesting that much more of the potent greenhouse
gas will be pumped into the atmosphere as northern wetlands continue to thaw and tropical ones to
warm, according to a new international study
led by a University of Guelph researcher.
The erupted
gases led to worldwide acid rain and atmospheric
warming of as much as 20 degrees centigrade.
A team
led by Fabian Walter of the Max Planck Institute for Radio Astronomy in Heidelberg, Germany, used 27 large radio telescopes in New Mexico to spot
warm carbon monoxide
gas circling the most distant quasar yet found.
Researchers used data from the two countries because they «are the world's two largest emitters of greenhouse
gases and responsible for about one - third of global
warming to date,» said Longjian Liu, M.D., Ph.D.,
lead study author and an associate professor of epidemiology and biostatistics at Drexel University in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Alterations in the quantity of atmospheric greenhouse
gases determines the amount of solar energy retained by the planet,
leading to global
warming or global cooling.
«These temperatures are likely because the universe then was
warmer than today and the
gas was unable to cool effectively,» explains
lead author and PhD student Shmuel Bialy of Tel Aviv University.
Boulder, Colo., USA: Cretaceous climate
warming led to a significant methane release from the seafloor, indicating potential for similar destabilization of
gas hydrates under modern global
warming.
Stable atmospheric concentrations of greenhouse
gases would
lead to continued
warming, but if carbon dioxide emissions could be eliminated entirely, temperatures would quickly stabilize or even decrease over time.
The letter notes that «Stable atmospheric concentrations of greenhouse
gases would
lead to continued
warming, but if carbon dioxide emissions could be eliminated entirely, temperatures would quickly stabilize or even decrease over time.
Soon is a
leading skeptic of the widely accepted science surrounding climate change, In the International Journal of Public Opinion Research, a study titled «The Structure of Scientific Opinion on Climate Change» found that 97 percent of scientists surveyed believed global
warming already is ongoing, with 84 percent of scientists surveyed believing human - produced greenhouse
gases were the driving force behind the change.
This week 2,500 of the world's
leading environmental scientists warned politicians of the drastic global
warming which will result if governments fail to reduce greenhouse
gases.
Others argue that global
warming brought on by the increased production of greenhouse
gasses will
lead to larger hurricane zones and more powerful storms.
However, the surface
warming caused by human - produced increases in carbon dioxide, methane, and other greenhouse
gases leads to a large increase in water vapor, since a
warmer atmosphere holds more moisture.
They concluded that greenhouse
gases were «the
leading contributor to» regional
warming since 1900.
Wicker also cited a publication by the Global
Warming Petition Project, a document signed by nearly 32,000 American scientists that disputes the international scientific consensus that man - made greenhouse
gas emissions are causing the Earth's atmosphere to
warm,
leading to potentially catastrophic changes in the climate.
The paper's
lead author describes his findings thus — «Recent observations suggest the expected rate of
warming in response to rising greenhouse
gas levels, or «Transient Climate Response,» is likely to lie within the range of current climate models, but not at the high end of this range.
The ocean becomes less effective at absorbing carbon dioxide with a weakened AMOC and this can
lead to higher quantities of the greenhouse
gas in the atmosphere worsening global
warming.
By producing more food on less land, it may be possible to reduce these emissions, but this so - called intensification often involves increasing fertilizer use, which can
lead to large emissions of nitrogen - containing
gases that also contribute to global
warming.
On the other hand,
lead - laden clouds send more heat from the earth back into space, cooling the world slightly and possibly lessening global
warming by greenhouse
gases.
Global
warming in the modern era is being driven by increasing concentrations of greenhouse
gases in the atmosphere, which
leads to an enhanced greenhouse effect.
The results
lead the authors to conclude that «this experimental data should effectively end the argument by skeptics that no experimental evidence exists for the connection between greenhouse
gas increases in the atmosphere and global
warming.»
A Japanese study showed that producing a kilogram of beef
leads to the emission of greenhouse
gases with a global
warming potential equivalent to 36.4 kilograms of carbon dioxide (CO2).
Each cottage has a rustic cosy character with leadlight windows and baltic pine floors with French doors that
lead to its own high walled private courtyard with
gas barbeque and outdoor eating area for enjoying barbeques in summer or catching the
warm sun in winter.
Question 3: Third sentence: «Greenhouse
gases re-radiate the absorbed energy in all directions, and thus part of this radiation goes back to the surface
leads to
warming.»
Only if this is wrong, and the true value is lower, can we escape the fact that unabated emissions of greenhouse
gases will
lead to the
warming projected by the IPCC.
Between the poles of real - time catastrophe and nonevent lies the prevailing scientific view: Without big changes in emissions rates, global
warming from the buildup of greenhouse
gases is likely to
lead to substantial, and largely irreversible, transformations of climate, ecosystems and coastlines later this century.
Carbon dioxide (CO2) is the main greenhouse
gas, and is the
leading cause of global
warming.
The findings came from the Climate Accountability Institute, an entity
led by Richard Heede, whose company, Climate Mitigation Services, advises companies, municipalities and others on how to cut greenhouse
gases, and Naomi Oreskes, the Harvard historian and co-author of «Merchants of Doubt: How a Handful of Scientists Obscured the Truth on Issues from Tobacco Smoke to Global
Warming.»
4) Increased greenhouse
gas concentrations
lead to more heat being trapped,
warming the planet further (Arrhenius, 1896).
(I think that an anomalously
warm ocean surface heated from below would
lead to more evaporation, and the additional water vapor would give a positive greenhouse effect that would partially offset the effect of a drop in greenhouse
gas concentrations.)
They concluded that greenhouse
gases were «the
leading contributor to» regional
warming since 1900.
A positive cloud feedback loop posits a scenario whereby an initial
warming of the planet, caused, for example, by increases in greenhouse
gases, causes clouds to trap more energy and
lead to further
warming.
The fear is that this could
lead to a vicious spiral - fewer trees to soak up CO2 means more global
warming gases in the air, which means higher temperatures and therefore fewer trees.
Whether he agrees or not, the best expert judgement is collected in the IPCC reports, and it says that increasing greenhouse
gas concentrations will
lead to a
warming world (WG1), discusses possible effect and finds them on balance negative (WG2) and finally, discusses mitigations and costs (WGIII).
«Since increased concentrations of CO2 can
lead to global
warming, some people have proposed increasing the emission of SO2 to stabilize the temperature because of the cooling effect of this
gas.
Even though it was widely recognized by the end of the 1980s that the existing stock of atmospheric greenhouse
gases was likely to
lead to some inevitable
warming, the policy community suppressed discussion of adaptation out of fear that it would blunt the arguments for greenhouse -
gas mitigation.
Changes to the temperature and pressure of permafrost soils (and ocean waters) could
lead to methane, a
gas with a much stronger greenhouse
warming potential than carbon dioxide, being released.
[1] Critics argued the Initiative, despite its title, actually weakened existing laws, such as the Clean Air Act and EPA proposed regulations on air pollutants, and did not address carbon dioxide, the most abundant heat trapping greenhouse
gas leading to global
warming.
2) CO2 is a greenhouse
gas without which life on earth is not possible, but adding it to the atmosphere should
lead to some
warming.
He quotes
leading author David Douglass saying; «The inescapable conclusion is that the human contribution is not significant and that observed increases in carbon dioxide and other greenhouse
gases make only a negligible contribution to climate
warming.»