Not exact matches
As well as explaining that the production of meat — on its journey from farm
to fork —
is responsible for 15 per cent of the planet's
harmful greenhouse
gas emissions, it underlines that raising equivalent amounts of grain or vegetables for
human consumption uses far less land, water and resources.
Although carbon monoxide
is a
gas that can
be fatal when inhaled, the meat industry insists that it
is not
harmful to human health when ingested via atmospheric packaging, which utilizes carbon monoxide
gas to extend the shelf life and resist spoilage.
-- A new post on ClimateEthics.org argues, as others have before, for another uncomfortable reality: Complacency
is not an ethical response
to the persistent uncertainty clouding forecasts of
harmful impacts from the continuing buildup of
human - generated greenhouse
gases in the atmosphere.
A new post on ClimateEthics.org argues, «Complacency
is not an ethical response
to the persistent uncertainty clouding forecasts of
harmful impacts from the continuing buildup of
human - generated greenhouse
gases in the atmosphere.»
The key air pollution - causing contaminant
is sulphur, which creates oxide
gases and particles, both of which
are harmful to human health.
Despite their well - known
harmful impacts
to the world's climate system1, 3, greenhouse
gases (GHG)
are deliberately emitted by countries
to drive economic growth and enhance
human wellbeing4.
I'd like
to know how the hell the Earth
was able
to come out of the ice age without
humans producing
harmful gases that collect in our atmostphere and supposedly trap heat.
It
is unclear
to me whether they ruled this because greenhouse
gases cause global warming, which
is harmful, or if the greenhouse
gases themselves
are harmful for
humans to inhale.